Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:35:45.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships Between Market Price Signals and Production Management: The Case of Fed Beef

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Joe L. Outlaw ,
David P. Anderson  and
Daniel I. Padberg
Joe L. Outlaw
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
David P. Anderson
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
Daniel I. Padberg
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The beef industry in the United States consists of several distinct production levels ranging from the cow-calf producer at the lowest level to the final consumer. These sectors face varying levels of profitability, degrees of market power, conflicting goals, and price signals. Environmental regulations involve questions of what costs are involved, who is in a position to pay these costs, and whether market prices are capable of signaling different environmental practices. Understanding the relationships within the beef industry may allow researchers to fine-tune analyses of environmental issues in the beef industry.

Keywords

beefBMPcattleenvironmentpricing
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , July 1997 , pp. 37 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D.P., Robb, J.G., and Mintert, J.. “The Cattle Cycle.” In Managing for Today's Cattle Market and Beyond, eds., Bastian, C. and Bailey, D.. Laramie WY: Western Extension Marketing Committee, University of Wyoming, 1996.Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., and Mitchell, R.C.. “The Value of Clean Water: The Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable, and Swimmable Quality of Water.” Discus. Pap. No. Qe85-08 (revised), Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 1986.Google Scholar
Ervin, D.E., and Graffy, E.A.. “Leaner Environmental Policies for Agriculture.” Choices (4th Quarter 1996):27–33.Google Scholar
Manale, A., and Narrod, C.. “Environmental Implication of Industry Structure in Dairy, Swine, and Poultry Industries.” Paper presented at the Great Plains Animal Waste Conference on Confined Animal Production and Water Quality, Denver CO, 19-21 October 1994.Google Scholar
Melton, B.E., Colette, W.A., and Willham, R.L.. “Imputing Input Characteristic Values from Optimal Commercial Breed or Variety Choice Decisions.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 76(August 1994):478-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Outlaw, J.L., Schwart, R.B. Jr., Knutson, R.D., Pagano, A.P., Gray, A., and Miller, J.W.. “Impacts of Dairy Waste Management Regulations.” Working Pap. No. 93-4, Agricultural and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University, May 1993.Google Scholar
Padberg, D.I., Knutson, R.D., and Jafri, S.H.A.. “Retail Food Pricing: Horizontal and Vertical Determinants.” J. Food Distribution Res. 24(1993):48–59.Google Scholar
Portney, P.Public Policies for Environmental Protection. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.Google Scholar
Smith, R. “Research Backs Cattlemen's Position They Are Critical Stewards of the Land.” Feed-stuffs 68,44(21 October 1996):9.Google Scholar
Smolen, M.D., and Caldwell, L.W.. “CAFO Education Program.” Paper presented at the Great Plains Animal Waste Conference on Confined Animal Production and Water Quality, Denver CO, 19-21 October 1994.Google Scholar
Sweeten, J.M. “Cattle Feedlot Waste Management Practices for Water and Air Pollution Control.” Pub. No. B-1671, Texas Agr. Ext. Ser., Texas A&M University System, 1990.Google Scholar
Sweeten, J.M., and Melvin, S.W.. “Controlling Water Pollution from Nonpoint Source Livestock Operations.” Paper presented at a National Conference on Perspectives on Nonpoint Source Pollution, Kansas City MO, 19-22 May 1985.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA/AMS). “Concentration in Agriculture: A Report of the USDA Advisory Committee on Agricultural Concentration.” USDA/AMS, Washington DC, June 1996a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA/AMS). “Concentration in the Red Meat Packing Industry.” USDA/AMS, Washington DC, February 1996b.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA/NRCS). “National Survey of Attitudes Toward Agricultural Resource Conservation.” Unpublished report of public survey findings conducted by The Gallup Organization. USDA/NRCS, Washington DC, February 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Managing Nonpoint Source Pollution.” Final Report to Congress on Section 319 of the Clean Water Act (1989). Pub. No. EPA-506/9-90, EPA, Office of Water, Washington DC, January 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “The Report of the EPA/State Feedlot Work Group.” EPA, Office of Wastewater Enforcement and Compliance, Washington DC, September 1993.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E., and Schroeder, T.C.. “Packer Concentration and Captive Supplies.” In Managing for Today's Cattle Market and Beyond, eds., Bastian, C. and Bailey, D.. Laramie WY: Western Extension Marketing Committee, University of Wyoming, 1996.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E., Schroeder, T.C., Barkley, A., and Koontz, S.R.. “Role of Captive Supplies in Beef Packing.” GIPSA-RR, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar