Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:42:03.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uncertainty Discounting for Land-Based Carbon Sequestration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Man-Keun Kim  and
Bruce A. McCarl
Man-Keun Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Resource Economics, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV
Bruce A. McCarl
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of stochastic factors on soil carbon makes the quantity of carbon generated under a sequestration project uncertain. Hence, the quantity of sequestered carbon may need to be discounted to avoid liability from shortfalls. We present a potentially applicable uncertainty discount and discuss difficulties that might arise in empirical use. We insist that the variance in historical crop yields across geographical areas is used to derive a proxy variance for forming an uncertainty discount for carbon projects. Application of our approach suggests that project level uncertainty discounts would be 15-20% for the East Texas region.

Keywords

carbon seqestrationdiscountuncertaintyH43Q54
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Adams, D., Callaway, J., Chang, C., and McCarl, B.A. “Sequestering Carbon on Agricultural Land: Social Cost and Impacts on Timber Markets.” Contemporary Policy Issues 11(1993):76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, J.M., Capalbo, S.M., Paustian, K.H., and Ali, K. “Estimating the Economic Potential for Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Central United States using an Aggregate Econometrie-Process Simulation Model.” Climatic Change 80,1-2(2007):145–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsey, R.A., and Heath, L.S. “Carbon Changes in US Forests.” Productivity of America's Forests and Climate Change. Joyce, L.A., ed. General Technical Report RM-271, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, 1995.Google Scholar
Butt, T.A., and McCarl, B.A. “On-Farm Carbon Sequestration: Can Farmers Make Money?” Choices 19,3(2004):27–31.Google Scholar
Canada. “Methodological Issues, Inventories and Uncertainties.” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice. Additional submissions by parties to the Ninth Session at Buenos Aires, 2-13 November 1998, Item 4 of the provisional agenda. Other Matters, Approaches to resolving methodological issues related to national communications from Annex I Parties, 1998. Internet site: http://www.unfccc.de/resource/docs/1998/sbsta/misc06a01.pdf.Google Scholar
Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). “Soil Carbon Management Offsets.” 2007. Internet site: http://www.chicagoclimatex.com/docs/offsets/CCX_Soil_Carbon_Offsets.pdf.Google Scholar
Heath, L.S., and Smith, J.E. “An Assessment of Uncertainty in Forest Carbon Budget Projections.” Environmental Science & Policy 3(2000):73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry, Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC, 2007a.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, 2007b.Google Scholar
Izaurralde, R.C., Williams, J.R., McGill, W.B., Rosenberg, N.J., and Quiroga, M.C. Jakas. “Simulating Soil Carbon Dynamics with EPIC: Model Description and Testing Against Long Term Data.” Ecological Modelling 192(2006):362–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. A Guide to Econometrics. 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-K., and McCarl, B.A. “Carbon Sequestration and Its Trading in U.S.” Invited paper prepared for presentation at the Symposium on Measures to Climatic Change in the Agricultural Sector, Rural Development Administration (RDA), (Korea) National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (NIAST), Seoul, Korea, September 7-11, 2008.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-K., McCarl, B.A., and Murray, B.C. “Permanence Discounting for Land-Based Carbon Sequestration.” Ecological Economics 64,4(2008):763–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimble, J.M. “Private Communication on Carbon Sequestration and Crop Yield.” At the Energy Agriculture Forum in CASMGS, College Station, TX, January 2004.Google Scholar
Kurkalova, L.A. “Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Discounting for Uncertainty.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53,4(2005):375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandrowksi, J.M., Jones, P.C., House, R., Sperow, M., Eve, M., and Paustian, K.. Economics of Sequestering Carbon in the U.S. Agricultural Sector. Technical Bulleting 1909. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2004.Google Scholar
Lieberman and Warner Bill. S.2191: Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007, 2007. Internet site: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:s2191.Google Scholar
Lubowski, R.N., Plantinga, A.J., and Stavins, R.N. “Land-Use Change and Carbon Sinks: Econometric Estimation of the Carbon Sequestration Supply Function.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51,2(2006):135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarl, B.A., and Schneider, U.A. “The Cost of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry.” Science 294(2001):2481–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, S., Antle, J., Capalbo, S., and Paustian, K. “Influence of Project Scale and Carbon Variability on the Costs of Measuring Soil Carbon Credits.” Environmental Management 33(2004): S252–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D.S., and McCabe, G.P.. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1993.Google Scholar
Parks, P.J., and Hardie, I.W. “Least-Cost Forest Carbon Reserves: Cost-Effective Subsidies to Convert Marginal Agricultural Land to Forests.” Land Economics 71(1995):122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W.J., Schimel, D.S., Ojima, D.S., and Cole, C.V. “A General Model for Soil Organic Matter Dynamics Sensitivity to Litter Chemistry, Texture and Management.” Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Process. Bryant, R.B. and Arnold, R.W., eds. SSSA Special Publication 39, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 1994.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A.J., Mauldin, T., and Miller, D.J. “An Econometric Analysis of the Cost of Sequestering Carbon in Forest.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):812–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seton's EH&S Compliance Resource Centers. Chapter I, Part 77,40-CFR Protection of Environment, 2003. Internet site: http://www.setonresourcecenter.com/40CFR/Docs/wcd0007c/wcd07c1a.asp.Google Scholar
Smith, J.E., and Heath, L.S. “Identifying Influences on Model Uncertainty: An Application Using a Forest Carbon Budget Model.” Environmental Management 27(2001):253–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stavins, R.N. “The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed-Preference Approach.” The American Economic Review 89(1999):994–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A.M., Rosenberg, N.J., Izurralde, R.C., and Brown, R.A. “Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment; Part 2: Models and Validation.” Climatic Change 69,1(2005):27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Kyoto Protocol, 1994, Internet site: htç.y/mifcœ.int/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/items/1678.php.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Farms and Land in Farms, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2004. Internet site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/zfl-bb/fmno0204.txt.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Office of Atmospheric Programs, Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture, EPA 430-R-05-006, Washington, DC, November 2005, Internet site: http://www.epa.gov/sequestration/pdf/green-housegas2005.pdf.Google Scholar
West, T.O., and Post, W.M. “Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis.” Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(2002):1930–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, T.O., Marland, G., King, A.W., Post, W.M., Jain, A.K., and Andrasko, K. “Carbon Management Response Curves: Estimates of Temporal Soil Carbon Dynamics.” Environmental Management 33(2004):507–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed