Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:20:55.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reaction between dilute acids and the phosphorus compounds of the soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Edward John Russell  and
James Arthur Prescott
Edward John Russell
Affiliation:
(Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.)
James Arthur Prescott
Affiliation:
(Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few reactions are more important to the soil chemist than that involved in the action of dilute acids on the phosphorus compounds of the soil, but, owing to its complex nature, little has been definitely ascertained about it. The importance of the reaction lies in the fact that it affords a distinction between those phosphorus compounds which are fairly easily soluble, and may therefore be expected to enter the plant root without much difficulty, and the less soluble compounds which are of less value in the nutrition of plants.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , September 1916 , pp. 65 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 65 note 1 Daubeny, C. G. B., “On the rotation of crops and on the quantity of Inorganic Matters abstracted from the soil by various plants under different circumstances.” Phil. Trans. 1845, 179–253.Google Scholar

Page 65 note 2 Dyer, B., “On the analytical determination of probable available mineral plant food in soils.” Trans. Chem. Soc. 1894, 65, 115–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Phil. Trans. 1901, 194B, 235–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 66 note 1 Trans. Chem. Soc. 1902, 81, 117–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 66 note 2 Grape, A. and Tollens, B., Ber. d. deutsch. Chem. Gesell. 1880, 13, 1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar; v Ollech, and Tollens, , Journ. f. Landw. 1882, 30, 519.Google Scholar

Page 66 note 3 Chem. Ind. 1884, 7, 37.Google Scholar

Page 66 note 4 Wood, T. B., Trans. Chem. Soc. 1896, 69, 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar, also Wood, and Berry, , This Journal, 1905, 1, 114–21.Google Scholar

Page 66 note 5 Trans. Chem. Soc. 1902, 81, 117–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 66 note 6 Landw. Jahrb. 1907, 36, 309–369.Google Scholar

Page 67 note 1 Trans. Chem. Soc. 1906, 89, 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 67 note 2 J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1907, 29, 929–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 68 note 1 Prescott, J. A., Proc. Chem. Soc. 1914, 30, 137–8Google Scholar

Page 68 note 2 Compt. Rend. 128, 1004.Google Scholar

Page 68 note 3 J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1907, 29, 929–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 69 note 1 This Journal, 1914, 6, 456–475Google ScholarPubMed; also Annual Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station, 1914, p. 6.

Page 75 note 1 Vienna, , 1909, quoted in Jour. Phys. Chem. 1914, p. 387.Google Scholar

Page 87 note 1 Prescott, , This Journal, 1914, 6, 110Google Scholar. Extended experience with this method has demonstrated its great accuracy for small amounts of P2O5 such as occur in soil extracts.

Page 92 note 1 Landw., Versuchs-Stat. 1913, 83, 357.Google Scholar