Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:30:31.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in milk secretion: I. The effect of nutrition on yield and composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Hammond  and
J. C. Hawk
J. Hammond
Affiliation:
(School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)
J. C. Hawk
Affiliation:
(School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I. As a result of withholding food for a few days, together with an injection of phloridzin, thereby reducing the nutrition, the daily yield of milk in goats was diminished and in one case the flow was actually stopped. On giving food again the yield returned almost to normal within a few days.

II. As the daily yield of milk diminished under these conditions so the percentage of fat in the milk rose. Limitation of the available nutriment in the body (change from a high to low state of nutrition) did not reduce the percentage of lactose or protein in the milk (Paton and Cathcart) but reduced the quantity of milk (together with the amounts of protein, sugar and salts) produced. The secretion of fat was not at first affected by the change in metabolism and as a consequence milk rich in fat was produced.

III. The amount of fat secreted per day under these conditions of diminishing yield was however not constant but became reduced, possibly as a secondary effect of the decreased secretion taking place in the gland cells.

IV. On again giving food to animals in such a reduced state of nutrition, the percentage of fat in the milk decreased as the yield increased, in some cases to such an extent that it was below that of the normal milk before the experiment began.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , March 1917 , pp. 139 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 139 note 1 Bul. Yorks. Coll., Leeds, No. 25, 1901.

Page 139 note 2 Univ. of Leeds, Bui. No. 44, 1903.

Page 139 note 3 Ztschr. f. Biol. Bd. XLII, 1901.Google Scholar

Page 140 note 1 Arch. Internat. de Physiol. T. VIII, 1909.Google Scholar

Page 140 note 2 Jour. of Physiol. Vol. XLII, 1911.Google Scholar

Page 140 note 3 New York State, Sta. Tech. Bul., No. 20, 1912.

Page 143 note 1 Univ. of Missouri, Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul., 100.

Page 143 note 2 Rpt. Midland Agric. and Dairy Coll., 1905–3.

Page 144 note 1 Ann. d. l. Sci. Agron. 4eSérie,, T. I, p. 321, 1912.Google Scholar

Page 145 note 1 Trans. High. and Agric. Soc. of Scotland, Vol. XXIII, 1911.Google Scholar

Page 145 note 2 Durham C.C., Offerton Bul., No. 2, 1907.

Page 146 note 1 Jour. of Physiol. Vol. XLII, 1911.Google Scholar