Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:27:25.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop responses to temperature and precipitation according to long-term multi-location trials at high-latitude conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2010

P. PELTONEN-SAINIO ,
L. JAUHIAINEN  and
K. HAKALA
P. PELTONEN-SAINIO*
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, Crop Science, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
L. JAUHIAINEN
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Services Unit, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
K. HAKALA
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, Crop Science, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: pirjo.peltonen-sainio@mtt.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Global warming has accelerated in recent decades and the years 1995–2006 were the warmest ever recorded. Also, in Finland, the last decade has been exceptionally warm. Hence, this study examines how current field crop cultivars, adapted to northern long-day conditions and short growing seasons, have responded to the elevated temperatures, especially with regard to determination of yield potential and quality. These comparisons were carried out with spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), oats (Avena sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), winter rye (Secale cereale L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and rapeseed (turnip rape, Brassica rapa L. and oilseed rape, B. napus L.). Long-term data sets of MTT Official Variety Trials and the Finnish Meteorological Institute were used to study crop responses to precipitation and elevated temperatures at different growth phases. The MTT data sets were also grouped into experiments that could be considered typical of the temperature conditions in the period 1971–2000 seasons (termed ‘1985’ conditions) or typical of the period 2010–39 (termed ‘2025’). At elevated temperatures, yields generally declined in these relatively cool growing conditions of northern Europe, except for pea. Elevated temperatures tended to have negative effects both in the pre- and post-anthesis phases, but the response depended on species. The response was probably associated with reduced water availability, which limited yield determination, especially in early growth phases. For example, in spring cereals a decrease in early summer precipitation by 10 mm decreased yields by 45–75 kg/ha. As warmer conditions also typically hastened development and growth in such generally cool growing conditions of Finland, it is essential that breeding programmes produce cultivars that are less sensitive to elevated temperatures, which are likely to become more frequent in future.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 149 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 49 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, L. V., Zhang, X., Peterson, T. C., Caesar, J., Gleason, B., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Haylock, M., Collins, D., Trewin, B., Rahimzadeh, F., Tagipour, A., Rupa Kumar, K., Revadekar, J., Griffiths, G., Vincent, L., Stephenson, D. B., Burn, J., Aguilar, E., Brunet, M., Taylor, M., New, M., Zhai, P., Rusticucci, M. & Vazquez-Aguirre, J. L. (2006). Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, D05109.1–D05109.22, doi:10.1029/2005JD006290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, F. G., Slafer, G. A. & Miralles, D. J. (2003). Grain and floret number in response to phoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Research 81, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, F. G., Slafer, G. A. & Miralles, D. J. (2005). Pre-anthesis development and number of fertile florets in wheat as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes Ppd-D1 and Ppd-B1. Euphytica 146, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2000). Emissions Scenarios. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007). Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M. & Miller, H. L.), pp. 1–18. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jylhä, K., Tuomenvirta, H. & Ruosteenoja, K. (2004). Climate change projections for Finland during the 21st century. Boreal Environment Research 9, 127–152.Google Scholar
Kangas, A., Laine, A., Niskanen, M., Salo, Y., Vuorinen, M., Jauhiainen, L. & Nikander, H. (2005). Results of Official Variety Trials 1997–2005. MTT:n selvityksiä 83. Kasvintuotanto, Finaldn: MTT.Google Scholar
Kaukoranta, T. & Hakala, K. (2008). Impact of spring warming on sowing times of cereal, potato and sugar beet in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science 17, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein Tank, A. M. G. & Können, G. P. (2003). Trends in indices of daily temperature and precipitation extremes in Europe, 1946–1999. Journal of Climate 16, 3665–3680.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein Tank, A. M. G., Wijngaard, J. B., Können, G. P., Böhm, R., Demarée, G., Gocheva, A.; Mileta, M., Pashiardis, S., Hejkrlik, L., Kern-Hansen, C., Heino, R., Bessemoulin, P., Müller-Westermeier, G., Tzanakou, M., Szalai, S., Pálsdóttir, T., Fitzgerald, D., Rubin, S.; Capaldo, M., Maugeri, M., Leitass, A., Bukantis, A., Aberfeld, R., Van Engelen, A. F. V., Forland, E., Mietus, M., Coelho, F., Mares, C., Razuvaev, V., Nieplova, E., Cegnar, T., López, J. A., Dahlström, B., Moberg, A., Kirchhofer, W., Ceylan, A., Pachaliuk, O., Alexander, L. V. & Petrovic, P. (2002). Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment. International Journal of Climatology 22, 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancashire, P. D., Bleiholder, H., Van Den Boom, T., Langeluddeke, P., Strauss, R., Weber, E., Witzenberger, A. (1991). A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Annals of Applied Biology 119, 561–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P. & Rajala, A. (2007). Duration of vegetative and generative development phases in oat cultivars released since 1921. Field Crops Research 101, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Rajala, A. & Kontturi, M. (2003). Development and growth of barley stands determining malting quality: copying growing conditions with crop management. In Proceedings of the 29th EBC Congress Dublin 2003. pp. 116–124. CD-ROM. Nürnberg, Germany: Fachverlag Hans Carl.Google Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kontturi, M., Rajala, A. & Tuuri, H. (2005). The role of pre- and post-anthesis water availability in predicting yield and protein content in malting barley. In InterDrought-II: the 2nd International Conference on Integrated Approaches to Sustain and Improve Plant Production Under Drought Stress: Rome, Italy, 24–28 September 2005. Abstracts of Lectures and Posters. p. 2.71. Rome, Italy: InterDrought II.Google Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L. & Hakala, K. (2009 a). Are there indications of climate change induced increases in variability of major field crops in the northernmost European conditions? Agricultural and Food Science 18, 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Rajala, A., Känkänen, H. & Hakala, K. (2009 b). Improving farming systems in northern European conditions. In Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy (Eds Sadras, V. O. & Calderini, D.), pp. 71–97. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L., Venäläinen, A. (2009 c). Comparing regional risks in producing turnip rape and oilseed rape. Today in light of long-term datasets. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, B Soil and Plant Science 59, 118–128.Google Scholar
SAS (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Slafer, G. A., Araus, J. L., Royo, C. & Garcia Del Moral, L. F. (2005). Promising eco-physiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in Mediterranean environments. Annals of Applied Biology 146, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomenvirta, H. (2004). Reliable estimation of climatic variations in Finland. PhD Thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland. Finnish Meteorological Institute Contributions No. 43.Google Scholar
Ugarte, C., Calderini, D. F. & Slafer, G. A. (2007). Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale. Field Crops Research 100, 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar