Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:56:44.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marginal sulphur supplies for grassland herbage in south-east Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. G. McLaren
R. G. McLaren
Affiliation:
East of Scotland College of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sulphur deficiency in agricultural crops has never been regarded as a significant problem in Great Britain. However, the widespread use of sulphurfree fertilizers and the introduction of Clean Air Acts together with increased crop yields necessitate a reappraisal of the situation. S.E. Scotland is an area where atmospheric sulphur dioxide levels are considerably lower than most other regions of Britain (Junge, 1972). The concentration of sulphur in precipitation is also relatively low (Stevenson, 1968) and therefore the area is likely to be affected by restricted sulphur supplies. A survey of the sulphur content of soils and corresponding herbage was carried out in this area during 1972 and 1973.

Type
Short Note
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , December 1975 , pp. 571 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolton, J. (1975). Effects of sulphur fertilizers and of copper on the yield and composition of spring wheat grown in a sandy soil prone to surface compaction. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. (1968). A comparison of five methods for determining the sulphur status of New Zealand soils. Transactions of the Ninth International Congress of Soil Science 11, 263–71.Google Scholar
Ensminger, L. E. (1954). Some factors affecting the adsorption of sulphate by Alabama soils. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 18, 259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. C. (1970). X-ray fluorescence analysis for light elements in plant and faecal materials. The Analyst 95, 919–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, R. L., Olson, R. A. & Rhoades, H. F. (1964). Evaluating the sulphur status of soils by plant and soil tests. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 28, 243–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. P. H., Cowling, D. W. & Lockyer, D. R. (1972). Plant-available and extractable sulphur in some soils of England and Wales. Soil Science 114, 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junge, C. E. (1972). Sulphur supplies of atmospheric origin. Proceedings of International Symposium on Sulphur in Agriculture, Versailles. 1970. I.N.R.A. 235–47.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. M. (1968). An analysis of the chemical composition of rainwater and air over the British Isles and Eire for the years 1959–1964. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 94, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. (1966). Nutrient minerals in grassland herbage. Mimeographed Publication No. 1/1966. Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops, Hurley, Berkshire.Google Scholar