Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:07:16.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutritive value of mustard cake derived from seeds of different genetic make up for growing chicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. K. Cilly
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
G. N. Lodhi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
J. S. Ichhponani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India

Summary

Cakes derived from Taramira (Eruca sativa), Raya (Brassica juncea), Toria (B. campestris var. toria) and yellow and brown sarson (B. campestris var. sarson) were evaluated for their contents of crude protein, true protein, essential amino acids, available carbohydrate and tannins. Feeding trials were also conducted to compare the suitability of these cakes with groundnut cake for broilers and White Leghorn chicks up to 4 weeks of age.

The crude protein content of Taramira cake was 33% whereas all the other cakes contained 37–38%. True protein accounted for 80–83% of crude protein in all the varieties and albumin and globulin constitutes the bulk of protein. The critical amino acid content of all the brassica seed proteins was found to be higher than that of other vegetable proteins although varietal differences were observed with respect to a few essential amino acids. The hulls accounted for 19% of whole Brassica seed and their removal raised the concentration of protein from 39 to 46% and reduced the crude fibre content from 15 to 6% in the defatted meal. Tannin content was higher in Taramira (1·74%) than in all other varieties (1·0–1·4%) and the major quantity of it was localized in the endosperm. The average metabolizable energy content of all the mustard cakes was 9·62 and 8·75 MJ/kg for meat-type and egg-type chicks, respectively. The nutritive value of Taramira cake was poorer than that of other Brassica cakes or groundnut cake for supporting growth rate of chicks of either breed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspinall, G. O. & Cottrell, I. W. (1971). Polysaccharides of soyabeans. VI. Neutral polysaccharides from cotyledon meal. Canadian Journal of Chemistry 49, 10191022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association Of Official Agricultural Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 10th ed.Washington, D.C.: A.O.A.C.Google Scholar
Bell, J. M., Young, C. G. & Downey, R. K. (1971). A nutritional comparison of various rapeseed and mustard seed and solvent-extracted meals of different glucosinolate composition. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 259269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilly, V. K., Lodhi, G. N. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1977). Mustard cake, a substitute for groundnut cake in egg-type and meat-type chick diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 759765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clandinin, D. R. (1967). Nutrient composition of expeller, prepress-solvent and solvent processed rapeseed meals. Poultry Science 46, 15961597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, K. M. (1956). The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 7, 4044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkee, A. B. & Thivierge, P. A. (1975). Bound phenolic acids in Brassica and Sinapis oilseeds. Journal of Food Science 40, 820822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, A. J. (1974). The amino acid composition of rapeseed hulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54, 595596.Google Scholar
Hand, D. W., Sanford, P. A. & Smyth, D. H. (1966). Polyphenolic compounds and intestinal transfer. Nature 209, 618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, F. W. & Anderson, D. L. (1958). Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. Journal of Nutrition 64, 587603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, E. L., Rees, D. A. & Richardson, N. G. (1965). Seed polysaccharides and their role in germination — A survey of the polysaccharide components of mustard seeds with special reference to the embryos. Biochemical Journal 95, 453458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerry, C., Goodin, J. R. & Duncon, C. (1971). Nitrogen metabolism in Atriplex polyrape as affected by substrate nitrogen and sodium chloride salinity. Agronomy Journal 63, 271276.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. J., Summers, J. D. & Jones, J. D. (1973). Nutritive value of air-classified rapeseed fractions. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 153156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodhi, G. N., Clandinin, D. R. & Renner, R. (1970). Factors affecting the metabolizable energy value of rapeseed meal. 1. Goitrogens. Poultry Science 49, 289294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodhi, G. N., Malik, N. S. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1974). Metabolizable energy, nitrogen absorbability and feeding value of expeller processed mustard cake for chicks. British Poultry Science 15, 459465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodhi, G. N., Renner, R. & Clandinin, D. R. (1969). Available carbohydrate in rapeseed meal as determined by chemical and chick bioassay method. Journal of Nutrition 99, 413418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodhi, G. N., Singh, D. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1976). Variation in nutrient content of feedingstuffs rich in protein and reassessment of the chemical method for metabolizable energy estimation for poultry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 293303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C. A. (1948). Aliens Commercial Organic Analysis. London: V. B. Churchill.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. S., Stephenson, E. L., Burgos, A., Floyd, J. & York, J. O. (1975). Effect of tannin content and dry matter digestion on energy utilization and average amino acid availability of hybrid sorghum grains. Poultry Science 54, 16191623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, R., Clandinin, D. R. & Robblee, A. R. (1955). Thyroid status of poultry birds fed rapeseed meal. Poultry Science 34, 1233.Google Scholar
Scott, M. L., Nesheim, M. C. & Young, R. J. (1969). Nutrition of the Chicken. Ithaca, New York: M. L. Scott and Associates.Google Scholar
Seth, P. C. C. & Clandinin, D. R. (1973). Metabolizable energy value and composition of rapeseed meal and of fractions derived therefrom by air-classification. British Poultry Science 14, 499505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, N. K. (1977). Feeding value of cottonseed cake for poultry. M.Sc. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.Google Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. & Slinger, S. J. (1963). A biological assay for metabolizable energy in poultry feed ingredients together with findings which demonstrate some of the problems associated with the evaluation of fats. Poultry Science 42, 313325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1973). Fibre and the other unavailable carbohydrates and their effects on the energy value of the diet. Proceeding Nutrition Society 32, 131136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, T. & Hillis, H. E. (1959). The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 10, 6368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vose, J. R. (1974). Chemical and physical studies of mustard and rapeseed coats. Cereal Chemistry 59, 658665.Google Scholar
Wetter, L. R. (1955). The determination of mustard oils in rapeseed meal. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 33, 980984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetter, L. R. & Craig, B. M. (1959). Varietal and environmental effects on rapeseed isothiocyanates and thiooxazolidone contents. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 39, 395399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yapar, Z. & Clandinin, D. R. (1972). Effect of tannins in rapeseed meal on its nutritional value for chicks. Poultry Science 51, 222228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youngs, C. G. (1967). Amount and composition of hull in rapeseed and mustard. Fats & Oil in Canada 2, 39.Google Scholar