Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:56:31.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Native American Indian Freemasonry and Its Relation to the Performative Turn within Contemporary American Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

JOY PORTER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is informed by recent work by the author unearthing the histories of Native American Indian Freemasons from the Revolutionary era to the present. Given that performed ritual has always been key to Masonic practice, it was initially supposed that Indian performance within Masonry could be explained using the same performative analytical lens that has recently been applied to various other aspects of the American and American Indian past. However, this research reveals that the performance paradigm has important limitations when applied in colonial or postcolonial contexts and that these have a particular significance when we evaluate the Native American fraternal experience of Freemasonry. This article explores the specifics of recent “performative” analyses and argues that whilst performance offers potentially revealing and enabling new means of comprehending Indian and non-Indian interaction, it also carries with it risks against which we must remain vigilant. It argues that the performance paradigm is useful only to the extent to which it can differentiate between positive cultural interaction and negative cultural appropriation. It concludes by suggesting that it is only when we conceive of culture as being essentially imaginative that performance as an analytical paradigm fully functions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 2: Special Collection: Art Across Frontiers , May 2013 , pp. 439 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mary Ann Clawson has provided good evidence of groups such as the Knights of Pythias towards the end of the nineteenth century that were cross-class and of male fraternity, providing an alternative to class differentiation. Clawson, Mary Ann, Constructing Brotherhood: Class, Gender and Fraternalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989), 104–5Google Scholar. However, the costs of repeated initiation and of membership suggest that Freemasonry was predominantly a middle-class phenomenon.

2 Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge, 1966)Google Scholar.

3 Gist, Noel P., Secret Societies: A Cultural Study of Fraternalism in the United States (Columbia: University of Missouri), University of Missouri Studies, 15, 4, 1 Oct. 1940, 81Google Scholar.

4 Fliegelman, Jay, Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Culture of Performance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959), 3, 48Google Scholar. Habermas, Jürgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (1962) trans. Thomas Burger with Frederick Lawrence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989)Google Scholar. Wills, Garry, Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence (New York: Doubleday, 1978)Google Scholar; Stephen E. Lucas, “Justifying America: The Declaration of Independence as Rhetorical Document,” in Thomas W. Benson, ed., American Rhetoric: Context and Criticism (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989), 67–130.

5 Fliegelman, 32.

6 Ibid., 194–95.

7 Anderson, B., Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (New York: Verso Press, 1983), 133Google Scholar; Adams quoted in Gustafson, Sandra M., Eloquence Is Power: Oratory and Performance in Early America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001), xiiiGoogle Scholar; Conn, Steven, History's Shadow: Native Americans and Historical Consciousness in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Roach, Joseph, Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; idem, “xii. Joseph Roach Talks to Ned Sublette,” available at www.afropop.org/multi/interview/ID/68/Joseph+Roach+talks+to+Ned+Sublette.

9 Roach, Cities of the Dead, 4; Holland, Sharon P., Raising the Dead: Readings of Death and (Black) Subjectivity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000), 9Google Scholar.

10 Brooks, Joanna, American Lazarus: Religion and the Rise of African-American and Native American Literatures (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 48, 46, 12, 147, 150Google Scholar.

11 Frantz Fanon, “On National Culture,” in idem, The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove, 1963), 210, original emphasis; Stuart Hall, “Cultural Identity and Diaspora,” in Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman, eds., Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 393–94.

12 Another relative, the Reverend Vine V. Deloria, was also a Freemason. See Philip J. Deloria, “Vine V. Deloria Sr., Dakota,” in R. David Edmunds, ed., The New Warriors: Native American Leaders since 1900 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2001), 85; and Denslow, Ray V., Masonic Portraits (Jefferson: Board of Publication for the Missouri Board of Research, 1972), 152–57Google Scholar.

13 See Anderson, Owanah, 400 Years: Anglican/Episcopal Missions among American Indians (Cincinnati: Forward Movement, 1997), 106Google Scholar.

14 For more on the Society of American Indians, which listed key Indian figures of the era such as Charles Eastman (Freemason), Carlos Montezuma (Freemason), Thomas Sloan and Arthur Hewitt amongst its membership, see Porter, Joy, To Be Indian: The Life of Iroquois-Seneca Arthur Caswell Parker (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2001)Google Scholar, chapter 5 and the references therein.

15 Vine Deloria Jr., Singing for a Spirit: A Portrait of the Dakota Sioux (Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light, 1991), 69.

16 Susan Gardner, A Vision of Double Woman: Ella Cara Deloria and the Profession of Kinship (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, forthcoming).

17 Deloria in Gardner, 22.

18 Philip Joseph Deloria quoted in Gardner, 56.

19 Bellin, Joshua D., Medicine Bundle: Indian Sacred Performance and American Literature, 1824–1932 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008), 9 (original emphasis), 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Phelan, Peggy, Unmarked: The Politics of Performance (New York: Routledge, 1993), 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Clifford, James, The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 22–23Google Scholar.

22 Bellin, Joshua D., The Demon of the Continent: Indians and the Shaping of American Literature (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001), 11, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar; White, Richard, The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires & Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1813 (Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1991), xvCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Mikhail Bakhtin, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. Vern W. McGee (Austin: University of Texas, 1986, 2); Clifford, 338.

24 Cohen, Kenneth, “A Mutually Comprehensible World? Native Americans, Europeans and Play in Eighteenth Century America,” American Indian Quarterly, 26 (2002), 67–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herman, Daniel J., “Romance on the Middle Ground,” Journal of the Early Republic, 19 (1999), 279–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bank, Rosemarie K., Theatre Culture in America 1825–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 463Google Scholar; Diamond, Stanley, In Search of the Primitive: A Critique of Civilization (New Brunswick: Transaction, 1974), 1Google Scholar.

25 Diamond, 1.

26 Trevor-Roper, Hugh, “The Past and Present: History and Sociology,” Past and Present, 42 (1969), 3–17, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Conquergood, Dwight, “Rethinking Ethnography: Towards a Critical Cultural Politics,” Communication Monographs, 58 (June 1981), 179–94, 188, 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Worthen, W. B., “Drama, Performativity, and Performance,” PMLA, 113, 5 (Oct. 1998), 1093–1107, 1099Google Scholar; Clifford Geertz, “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight,” Daedalus, 101, 1, Myth, Symbol and Culture (Winter 1972), 1–37.

27 The transgressive element in performance has been highlighted by John McKenzie in Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance (London: Routledge, 2004); the legal roots of performance as an idea have been explored by Gerland, Oliver in “From Playhouse to p2p Network: The History and Theory of Performance under Copyright Law in the United States” Theatre Journal, 59, 1 (2007), 75–95, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Bellin, Medicine Bundle, 25.

29 Deloria, Philip J., Playing Indian (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004), 187Google Scholar.

30 Joshua Bellin, Medicine Bundle, 128.

31 Cantwell, Robert, Ethnomimesis: Folklife and the Representation of Culture (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992), 226, 181Google Scholar; Scheiber, Andrew J., “Mirrors and Menageries: Criticism, Ethnography, and Multiculturalism in Contemporary Literary Praxis,” American Literary History, 8, 2 (1996), 364–87, 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosaldo, Renato, Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis (Boston: Beacon, 1989), 198, 199, 71Google Scholar.

32 Root, Deborah, Cannibal Culture: Art, Appropriation and the Commodification of Difference (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996), 18Google Scholar.