Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:40:44.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The American Past: Is it Still Usable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

J. R. Pole
J. R. Pole
Affiliation:
Churchill College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The past, in the course of its ever-recurring encounters with the demands inflicted on it by the present, enjoys one inestimable advantage: it cannot answer, it is not even listening. ‘We ask and ask, thou smilest and art still’, we might almost say, giving to Arnold's ponderous lines a touch of unintended meaning. In spite of appearances to the contrary, even the American past is in the same position. Even after the lapse (the ‘revolution’, as Gibbon would have said) of more than three and a half centuries of continuous settlement, the historian who has been educated entirely in the tradition and the environment of the United States needs rather more than his European contemporary's normal degree of subtlety if he is to free himself from the peculiarly American version of the space-time continuum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , April 1967 , pp. 63 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 63 note 1 Butterfield, Herbert, The Whig Interpretation of History (Cambridge, 1931)Google Scholar.

page 64 note 1 Bancroft, George: History of the United States, 6 vols (Boston 1879)Google Scholar; Formation of the Constitution, 2 vols (Boston, 1882)Google Scholar.

page 65 note 1 Robinson, James Harvey, The New History (New York, 1912), pp. 15, 24Google Scholar; Destler, Chester McArthur, ‘Some observations on contemporary historical theory’, A.H.R. 55 (04 1950), 503, n. 3Google Scholar.

page 65 note 2 Beard, Charles A., An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York, 1913)Google Scholar.

page 66 note 1 Destler, ‘Contemporary historical theory’, loc. cit. pp. 503–6; Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History (Oxford, 1946)Google Scholar.

page 66 note 2 Beale, Howard K., The Critical Year: A study of Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction (New York, 1930)Google Scholar. Charles, and Beard, Mary, The Rise of American Civilization, revised edition, (New York, 1949), chap. xviiiGoogle Scholar.

page 66 note 3 Beard, Charles A., The Economic Basis of Politics and Related Writings, compiled Beard, William (New York, 1958)Google Scholar.

page 67 note 1 Read, Conyers, ‘The social responsibilities of the historian’, A.H.R. 55, no. 2 (01 1950)Google Scholar.

page 67 note 2 Boston, 1946. In the same connexion see Goldman, Eric F., Rendezvous with Destiny (New York, 1952)Google Scholar.

page 68 note 1 Parrington, Vernon Louis, Main Currents in American Thought, 3 vols (New York, 1927–1930)Google Scholar; Simpson, Alan, ‘How democratic was Roger Williams?’ W.M.Q. (01 1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 69 note 1 Kennan, George F., American Diplomacy 1900–1950 (Chicago, 1951)Google Scholar; Blum, John M., Woodrow Wilson and the Politics of Morality (Boston, 1956)Google Scholar.

page 69 note 2 May, Ernest R., ‘An American tradition in foreign policy: the role of public opinion’, in Nelson, William H. (ed.), Theory and Practice in American Politics (Chicago, 1964)Google Scholar.

page 70 note 1 Ritcheson, C. R., British Politics and the American Revolution, 1763–1783 (Norman, 1954)Google Scholar; Donoughue, Bernard, British Politics and the American Revolution.…1773–1775 (London, 1964)Google Scholar; Greene, Jack P., The Quest for Power: The Lower Houses of Assembly in the Southern Royal Colonies, 1689–1776 (Chapel Hill, 1963)Google Scholar.

page 70 note 2 Cox, LaWanda, ‘The promise of land for the freedmen’, M.V.H.R. 45 (1958), 413–40Google Scholar.

page 71 note 1 Coben, Stanley, ‘Northeastern business and Radical Reconstruction: a re-examination’, M.V.H.R. 46 (1959)Google Scholar.

page 71 note 2 Unger, Irwin, The Greenback Era: A Social and Political History of American Finance, 1865–1878 (Princeton 1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 71 note 3 Ibid. p. 405.

page 71 note 4 For a specific affirmation of these revisionist views (in this case of the Abolitionists) as serving an instrumentalist purpose, see Zinn, Howard, ‘Abolitionists, Freedom-Riders and the Tactics of Agitation’ in Duberman, Martin (ed.), The Antislavery Vanguard: New Essays on the Abolitionists (Princeton, 1965)Google Scholar.

page 72 note 1 ‘The irony of Southern history’, J.S.H. 19 (1953)Google Scholar, reprinted in The Burden of Southern History (New York, 1960)Google Scholar.

page 73 note 1 McCormick, op. cit. p. 353.

page 74 note 1 Quoted by Rossiter, Clinton, Seedtime of the Republic (New York, 1953), p. 4Google Scholar.

page 74 note 2 Meyers, Marvin, The Jacksonian Persuasion: Politics and Belief (New York, 1957)Google Scholar.

page 74 note 3 Hofstadter, Richard, The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It (New York, 1951)Google Scholar, Introduction.

page 75 note 1 Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York, 1955)Google Scholar.

page 75 note 2 A view developed in Professor Hartz's Commonwealth Fund lectures at University College, London, in 1962 and in The Founding of New Societies, ed. Hartz, (New York, 1964)Google Scholar.

page 76 note 1 Boorstin, Daniel J.: The Genius of American Politics (Chicago, 1953)Google Scholar; The Americans: The Colonial Experience (New York, 1958)Google Scholar; The National Experience (New York, 1965)Google Scholar.