Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:33:03.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Politics, and Health in Early American Thought: The Case of David Ramsay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Lawrence J. Friedman  and
Arthur H. Shaffer
Lawrence J. Friedman
Affiliation:
Professor of History and American Studies at Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Arthur H. Shaffer
Affiliation:
Professor of History at the University of Missouri, St. Louis, Missouri 63121.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1785 physician-politician David Ramsay of Charleston published The History of the Revolution of South Carolina. Contemporaries praised it highly. Four years later Ramsay produced a more ambitious work, The History of the American Revolution. It established his reputation both in America and abroad as the new nation's leading historian. Thus in a few short years Ramsay went from a locally prominent physician and State legislator to an important national cultural and literary figure. The American reading public found his approach to history to its tastes. He expressed a set of ideas about American history in general and the Revolution in particular that were common currency in the United States. But he expressed them for the first time in well-reasoned and documented historical narrative: in volumes that were suitably pro-American, yet judicious in their treatment of Britain, that made a strong case for American uniqueness while maintaining the ideal of the United States as a model for the world.

Ramsay's histories alone would attract our interest as the first and most influential historical analysis of the American Revolution and the ratification of the Federal Constitution. But Ramsay's writings and his career as physician and politician are also significant because they launch us upon a journey into the mind of one of the new nation's most articulate spokesmen on historical, political, and medical issues. There is, to be sure, little in the general pattern of his life to distinguish him from a number of his contemporaries among the professions and political figures of second rank. Ramsay seldom formulated original ideas. His importance was not simply, or even primarily, that of a political or historical philosopher or medical innovator.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 1979 , pp. 37 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ramsay, David, History of South Carolina, from Its First Settlement in 1670 to the Year 1808 (Charleston, 1809), 2, 240Google Scholar.

2 Brunhouse, Robert L., ed., “David Ramsay, 1749–1815: Selections from His Writings,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Ser., 55, Pt. 4 (1965), 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ramsay, David, The History of the American Revolution (Philadelphia, 1789), 1, 27–34Google Scholar.

3 Rogers, George C., Charleston in the Age of the Pinckneys (Norman, Oklahoma, 1969), pp. 94–95Google Scholar.

4 Brunhouse, p. 15.

5 Ibid., p. 122.

6 Friedman, Lawrence J., Inventors of the Promised Land (New York, 1975), p. 28Google Scholar, analyzes this aspect of Ramsay.

7 Rogers, George C., Evolution of a Federalist: William Loughton Smith of Charleston (1758–1812) (Columbia, S.C., 1962), pp. 154–55Google Scholar.

8 Proud, Robert, The History of Pennsylvania in North America (Philadelphia, 1797–1798), 1, 5Google Scholar.

9 Wood, Gordon S., The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787 (Chapel Hill, 1969), p. 58Google Scholar; Shaffer, Arthur H., The Politics of History: Writing the History of the American Revolution 1783–1815 (Chicago, 1975), p. 74Google Scholar.

10 Ramsay, , History of the American Revolution, 2, 323Google Scholar.

11 Brunhouse, p. 75.

12 Ramsay, , History of the American Revolution, 1, 34, 32, 29Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., 2, 341.

14 Brunhouse, p. 115.

15 Ibid., p. 183.

16 Ibid., p. 110.

17 Wood, , Creation of the American Republic, p. 475Google Scholar.

18 Ramsay, , History of South Carolina, 2, 243, 238, 239Google Scholar.

19 Brunhouse, p. 174.

20 Ramsay, , History of South Carolina, 2, 243Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., 2, 241.

22 Ramsay, , History of the American Revolution, 1, 197Google Scholar.

23 Ramsay, , History of South Carolina, 2, 213–14Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., 2, 214.

25 Ibid., 2, 215.

26 Brunhouse, p. 192.

27 Kerber, Linda K., Federalists in Dissent: Imagery and Ideology in Jeffersonian America (Ithaca, 1970), p. 178Google Scholar.

28 See Henretta, James A., The Evolution of American Society, 1700–1815: An Interdisciplinary Analysis (Lexington, Mass., 1973), pp. 101–02Google Scholar.

29 Brunhouse, pp. 209–17.

30 Ramsay, David, A Sketch of the Soil, Climate, Weather, and Diseases of South Carolina, Read before the Medical Society of that State (Charleston, 1796), p. 21Google Scholar.

31 Ibid., p. 25.

32 Rosen, George, “ Political Order and Human Health in Jeffersonian Thought,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 26 (1952), 33–34, 37Google ScholarPubMed.

33 Brunhouse, p. 213.

34 Quoted in Waring, Joseph, A History of Medicine in South Carolina 1670–1825 (Columbia, S.C., 1964), p. 290Google Scholar. See also ibid., pp. 289–90; Ramsay, , History of South Carolina, 2, 36, 48, 49Google Scholar; Medical Repository, 4 (1801), 100, 218Google Scholar; 2d hexade, 2 (1805), 365–66; Ramsay, , The Charleston Medical Register for the Year 1802 (Charleston, 1803), p. 5Google Scholar.

35 Holmes, Chris, “ Benjamin Rush and the Yellow Fever,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 40 (1966), 246–50Google Scholar.

36 Waring, , Medicine in South Carolina, p. 289Google Scholar. See also ibid., pp. 286, 289; Medical Repository, 2d hexade, 2 (1805), 366; 2d hexade, 5 (1808), 234.

37 Holmes, “ Rush,” p. 255.

38 Medical Repository, 4 (1801), 101, 103Google Scholar; Ramsay, , A Sketch of the Soil, Climate, Weather, and Diseases, p. 26Google Scholar; Ramsay, , History of South Carolina, 2, 42, 48–49Google Scholar; Ramsay, , A Dissertation on the Means of Preserving Health in Charleston, and the Adjacent Low Country (Charleston, 1790), pp. 15–16Google Scholar; Brunhouse, p. 29.

39 Ramsay, , A Dissertation on Preserving Health, pp. 7–8, 10, 12–13Google Scholar; Medical Repository, 4 No. 3 (1801), 219Google Scholar; 2d hexade, 2 (1805), 366.