Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
1 Jacques, Derrida, “Signature Event Context,” Glyph, 1 (1977), 80Google Scholar; William, Carlos Williams, Selected Essays (New York: New Directions, 1969), 256.Google Scholar
2 Enrico, Prampolini, “The Aesthetic of the Machine and Mechanical Introspection in Art,” Little Review (05 1927), 10.Google Scholar
3 Ezra, Pound, “Tentative Propositions or Outline for Discussion” (1927), first published in Harriet, Zinnes, ed., Ezra Pound and the Visual Arts (New York: New Directions, 1980), 302, 303Google Scholar; the book was never completed, but see “Machines” (an introductory note to 15 photographs), New Review, 1 (Winter 1931/1932), 291–92.Google Scholar
4 Gilles, Deleuze and Félix, Guattari, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Robert, Hurley, Mark, Seem and Lane, Helen R. (London: Athlone Press, 1984), 36.Google Scholar
5 Compare the discussion of Bauhaus functionalism in Jean, Baudrillard, For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, trans. Charles, Levin (St Louis: Telos Press, 1981), 196–98Google Scholar. The extreme view is summarized in Hannes, Meyer's contention that “there was no aesthetic factor involved in design,” quoted in Stephen, Bann, ed., The Tradition of Constructivism (London: Thames and Hudson, 1974), xxxviii.Google Scholar
6 David, Antin, “Some Questions about Modernism,” Occident, 8 (Spring, 1974), 19Google Scholar. This piece develops ideas proposed in Antin's, “Modernism and Postmodernism: Approaching the Present in American Poetry,” boundary 2, 1 (Fall 1972), 98–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar