Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:38:14.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whither Industrial Democracy? The Federal Government and Organized Labour in the Telegraph Industry during the First World War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2014

STEVEN PARFITT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent historiography of American labour in the First World War pays special attention to the idea of industrial democracy. The federal government, historians argue in various ways, played a major role in defining that term and affecting how trade unionists, employers and all kinds of industrial and political reformers fought over and applied their own definitions of industrial democracy. In this article I look at one case study of wartime federal intervention in labour relations, between the Commercial Telegraphers' Union of America (CTUA) and the Western Union Telegraph Company. During the war both parties were subject to intervention from the National War Labor Board, the main federal arbitration agency, and then, after nationalization of the telegraphs, the federal Telegraph and Telephone Administration. The experience of the CTUA is more or less at odds with recent general accounts of First World War labour. In this article I argue that this experience points towards a change of emphasis regarding federal-style industrial democracy, placing greater stress on its role in leading directly to the non and antiunion industrial policies practised by many employers in the 1920s, in addition to its encouragement of trade union growth in wartime.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 517 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Conner, Valerie Jean, The National War Labor Board: Stability, Social Justice, and the Voluntary State in World War I (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Dubofsky, Melvyn, “Abortive Reform: The Wilson Administration and Organized Labor, 1913–1920,” in Cronin, James and Sirianni, Carmen, eds., Work, Community, and Power: The Experience of Labor in Europe and America, 1900–1925 (Philadelphia: Temple Hill University Press, 1983)Google Scholar, 197–220; McCartin, Joseph, Labor's Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern Labor Relations, 1912–1921 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Haydu, Jeffrey, Making American Industry Safe for Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on the State and Employee Representation in the Era of World War I (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

2 Gitelman, Howard, “Management's Crisis of Confidence and the Origin of the National Industrial Conference Board, 1914–1916,” Business History Review, 58, 2 (1984), 176Google Scholar.

3 Taft, Philip, The A. F. of L in the Time of Gompers (New York: Harper, 1957), 362Google Scholar.

4 Sanders, Elizabeth, Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999), 240Google Scholar; Downey, Gregory J., Telegraph Messenger Boys: Labor, Technology, and Geography, 1850–1950 (New York: Routledge, 2002), 53Google Scholar; Jepsen, Thomas C., My Sisters Telegraphic: Women in the Telegraph Office, 1846–1950 (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000), 148–63Google Scholar; Silva, Anthony J., “Strikes by Telegraph Workers,” in Brenner, Aaron, Day, Benjamin and Ness, Immanuel, eds., The Encyclopedia of Strikes in American History (Armonk, NY: E. M. Sharpe, 2009), 499–501Google Scholar.

5 See especially Norwood, Stephen H., Labor's Flaming Youth: Telephone Operators and Worker Militancy, 1878–1923 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

6 Montgomery, David, “The ‘New Unionism’ and the Transformation of Workers Consciousness in America, 1909–22,” Journal of Social History, 7, 4 (1974), 509–29Google Scholar.

7 “Official NWLB Docket, Commercial Telegraphers vs. Western Union,” from Research Collections in Labor Studies: Papers of the National War Labor Board, 1918–1919 (hereafter PNWLB); Israel, Paul, From Machine Shop to Industrial Laboratory: Telegraphy and the Changing Context of American Invention, 1830–1920 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), 162Google Scholar; Jepsen, 32–35; Downey, 55.

8 Patmore, Greg, “Employee Representation Plans in the United States, Canada, and Australia: An Employer Response to Workplace Democracy,” Labor: Studies in Working Class History of the Americas, 3, 2 (2006)Google Scholar; Montgomery, Fall of the House of Labor, 348–51, 412.

9 Downey, 176–77; Jepsen, 180.

10 McCartin, 39; Montgomery, Fall of the House of Labor, 370; Montgomery, “The “New Unionism,” 513; “Consumer Price Index 1913–2009,” published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, available at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt.

11 Koistinen, Paul A. C., “The ‘Industrial–Military Complex’ in Historical Perspective: World War I”, Business History Review, 41, 4 (1967), 382Google Scholar.

12 Gompers, Samuel, Seventy Years of Life and Labor: An Autobiography, Volue I (New York: A. M. Kelley, 1967), 536–37Google Scholar.

13 “1918 Report of the Department of Labor,” 28, from the United States Congressional Serial Set (hereafter known as CSS).

14 “Official NWLB Docket, Commercial Telegraphers vs. Western Union,” PNWLB; Conner, War Labor Board, 36–37.

15 Downey, 178.

16 “CTUA Local No. 60 to National War Labor Board,” 2 March 1919, PNWLB.

17 Washington Post, 1 April 1918.

18 Steuben, John, Labor in Wartime (New York: International Publishers, 1940), 45Google Scholar.

19 “The National War Labor Board: What it Is; How it Works,” PNWLB.

20 Conner, 37–39.

21 National War Labor Board, “Functions, Power and Duties of the Board,” PNWLB; “The National War Labor Board: What it Is; How it Works.”

22 Haydu, Making American Industry Safe, 49.

23 NWLB, “Functions, Power and Duties of the Board”; “Report of the National Industrial Conference Board to the Council of National Defense,” 6 September 1917, PNWLB; Haydu, 55.

24 “Official NWLB Docket, Commercial Telegraphers vs. Western Union,” PNWLB; Conner, 37–39; Haydu, 66–67; Montgomery, Fall of the House of Labor, 374.

25 Conner, 46.

26 Ibid., 40.

27 “A. P. Harwood to Woodrow Wilson,” July 1918, PNWLB.

28 “Loyall A. Osborne to William H. Taft,” 31 May 1918, PNWLB.

29 Conner, 41.

30 “William H. Taft to Newcomb Carlton,” 27 May 1918, PNWLB.

31 Conner, 41–43; “Official NWLB Docket, Commercial Telegraphers vs. Western Union”; “Industrial Autocracy in the Telegraph Companies,” PNWLB.

32 Conner, 41–46; “Newcomb Carlton to Woodrow Wilson,” 27 June 1918, PNWLB; “The Western Union and the War Labor Board: The Company's Position,” PNWLB.

33 Haydu, 66–67; Conner, 48; McCartin, Labor's Great War, 93.

34 Stromquist, Shelton, Reinventing the People: The Progressive Movement, the Class Problem, and the Origins of Modern Liberalism (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006), 66Google Scholar, 73–74.

35 “1918 Report of the Post Office Department,” CSS.

36 Davis, Colin, Power at Odds: The 1922 National Railroad Shopmen's Strike (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1997), 37–47Google Scholar.

37 Taillon, Paul, Good, Reliable, White Men: Railroad Brotherhoods, 1877–1917 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

38 Downey, Telegraph Messenger Boys, 179–80; Conner, 165; “Meeting of the NWLB Executive Board,” 13 Nov. 1918, PNWLB.

39 “Meeting of the NWLB Executive Board,” 13 Nov. 1918.

40 Norwood, Labor's Flaming Youth, 166.

41 Silva, “Strikes by Telegraph Workers,” 503.

42 Conner, 165; Fleming, Thomas, The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I (New York: Basic Books, 2003), 395Google Scholar.

43 Norwood, 164.

44 “The Western Union and the War Labor Board: The Company's Position.”

45 Silva, 503.

46 “1919 Report of the Postmaster General,” 23, CSS; Kerr, K. Austin, “Decision for Federal Control: Wilson, McAdoo, and the Railroads, 1917,” Journal of American History, 54, 3 (1967), 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Silva, 503.

48 “The Postmaster General's Order No. 2067,” 2 Oct. 1918, PNWLB; “S. J. Konenkamp to W. Jett Lauck,” 18 Jan. 1919, PNWLB.

49 “S. J. Konenkamp to W. Jett Lauck,” 25 Oct. 1918, PNWLB; “Memorandum for Mr. Lauck,” 5 March 1919, PNWLB.

50 McCartin in Labor's Great War, Dubofsky in The State and Labor, and Conner in The National War Labor Board have emphasized the positive aspects for labour of these committees; Jeffrey Haydu in Between Craft and Class and Making American Industry Safe for Democracy, and to some extent David Montgomery in The Fall of the House of Labor, have emphasized the way that these committees usurped the role of unions in industrial relations.

51 Montgomery, Fall of the House of Labor, 412.

52 Downey, Telegraph Messenger Boys, 180.

53 Harris, Howell John, “The Snares of Liberalism,” in Tolliday, Steven and Zeitlin, Jonathan, eds., Shop Floor Bargaining and the State: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 158Google Scholar.

54 “Memorandum of Commercial Telegraphers of America Having Reference to the Failure of the Telegraph and Telephone Companies Now under Government Control,” PNWLB.

55 New York Times, 13 Aug. 1918.

56 S. J. Konenkamp to W. Jett Lauck, 21 Nov. 1918, PNWLB.

57 “Memorandum of Commercial Telegraphers of America Having Reference to the Failure of the Telegraph and Telephone Companies now Under Government Control”; “The Western Union and the War Labor Board: The Company's Position.”

58 Norwood, Labor's Flaming Youth, 164.

59 Conner, 164; “S. J. Konenkamp to W. Jett Lauck,” 25 Oct. 1918.

60 McCartin, Labor's Great War, 179.

61 “Docket 1124, Western Union Employees Association v. Western Union,” PNWLB; Meeting of the NWLB Executive Board,” 19 Feb. 1919, PNWLB; “National War Labor Board Daily Press Clippings,” 31 Jan. 1919, PNWLB; Conner, 165–66.

62 “S. J. Konenkamp to the Wire Board,” 28 October 1918, PNWLB; “S. J. Konenkamp to W. Jett Lauck,” 25 Oct. 1918.

63 “Resolution of the Philadelphia Unit of the Postal Telegraph System Division of the CTUA,” 16 Jan. 1919, PNWLB.

64 Downey, Telegraph Messenger Boys, 27; “Telegraph Messenger's Union to the National War Labor Board,” 14 April 1919, PNWLB.

65 “Resolution of the Philadelphia Unit of the Postal Telegraph System Division of the CTUA,” 16 Jan. 1919; “National War Labor Board Daily Press Clippings,” 3 March 1919, PNWLB.

66 “S. J. Konenkamp to National War Labor Board, 1 June 1919, PNWLB; “S. J. Konenkamp to Albert S. Burleson,” 2 June 1919, PNWLB; Washington Post, 12 June 1919.

67 New York Times, 20 June 1919, 27 June 1919.

68 Dubofsky, The State and Labor, 76.

69 Dubofsky, “Abortive Reform.”

70 Tyler, Robert, “The Government as Union Organizer: The Loyal Legion of Loggers and Lumbermen,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 47, 3 (1960), 441–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Dubofsky, , We Shall Be All: A History of the Industrial Workers of the World (Chicago: Quadrangle Books: 1969), 445–47Google Scholar, 466.

72 McCartin, Labor's Great War, 164; Eggert, Gerald G., Steelmasters and Labor Reform, 1886–1923 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1981), 116–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Harris, Howell John, “Industrial Democracy and Liberal Capitalism,” in Lichtenstein, Nelson and Harris, Howell John, eds., Industrial Democracy: The Ambiguous Promise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 56Google Scholar; Montgomery, Fall of the House of Labor, 412; Patmore, “Employee Representation Plans,” 45–53.

74 McCartin, 226–27.