No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 August 2013
In response to the contemporary ecological movement, ecological perspectives have become a significant theme in the theology of creation. This paper asks whether antecedents to this growing significance might predate the concerns of our times and be discernible within the diverse interests of nineteenth-century Anglican thinking. The means used here to examine this possibility is a close reading of B. F. Westcott's ‘Gospel of Creation’. This will be contextualized in two directions: first with reference to the understanding of the natural world in nineteenth-century English popular thought, and secondly with reference to the approach taken to the doctrine of creation by three late twentieth-century Anglican writers, two concerned with the relationship between science and theology in general, and a third concerned more specifically with ecology.
Honorary Research Associate, MCD University of Divinity, Melbourne.
2. Hymns Ancient and Modern, for Use in the Services of the Church (London: William Clowes, 2nd edn, 1875).Google Scholar
3. Although ecological theology is by nature ecumenical, I confine myself to Anglican thinkers in this paper because it originated as a discussion paper for the bilateral Anglican–Orthodox dialogue, as a way of outlining specifically Anglican approaches to ecological theology.Google Scholar
4. Rigby, C., Topographies of the Sacred: The Poetics of Place in European Romanticism (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2004), p. 13.Google Scholar
5. Rigby, Topographies, p. 17.Google Scholar
6. Rigby, Topographies, p. 19.Google Scholar
7. Rigby, Topographies, p. 18.Google Scholar
8. F. Nietzsche, The Gay Science, available at http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/philosophy/friedrich_nietzsche_quotes.html (accessed 12 April 2013).Google Scholar
9. Rigby, Topographies, pp. 64–65. Australian readers should be aware of the extraordinary significance of place in Aboriginal ontology. See Swain, T., A Place for Strangers: Towards a History of Australian Aboriginal Being (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Rigby, Topographies, p. 236.Google Scholar
11. Rigby, Topographies, p. 237.Google Scholar
12. Rigby, Topographies, p. 240.Google Scholar
13. This tradition in English poetry is to be seen as early as Thomas Traherne (1636/7–1674), whose relevance to the ecological crisis has been noted in Allchin, A.M., The World Is a Wedding: Explorations in Christian Spirituality (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1978), p. 83. See also P. Armstrong, The English Parson Naturalist: A Companionship between Science and Religion (Leominster: Gracewing, 2000) on Anglican forerunners of the ecological movement in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.Google Scholar
14. Westcott, B.F., Social Aspects of Christianity (London: Macmillan, 1887), p. 90.Google Scholar
15. Graham Patrick sees Westcott's fascination with bridges as symbolic of his life-long commitment to the reconciling of contradictory positions, politically as well as theologically. Patrick, G.A., The Miners’ Bishop: Brooke Foss Westcott (Peterborough: Epworth, 2002), p. x.Google Scholar
16. Link-Wieczorek, U., ‘Mediating Anglicanism: Maurice, Gore and Temple’, in D. Fergusson (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth-Century Theology (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 282–284.Google Scholar
17. Thompson, D., Cambridge Theology in the Nineteenth Century: Enquiry, Controversy and Truth (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), p. 103.Google Scholar
18. Westcott, B.F., Thoughts on Revelation and Life (ed. S. Phillips; London: Macmillan, 1887), p. 247.Google Scholar
19. Westcott, Thoughts on Revelation and Life, p. 247.Google Scholar
20. Westcott, B.F., The Gospel of the Resurrection: Thoughts on its Relation to Reason and History (London: Macmillan, 1889), pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
21. Westcott, Gospel of the Resurrection, p. 157.Google Scholar
22. Polkinghorne, J., The Faith of a Physicist: Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996), p. 11.Google Scholar
23. Polkinghorne, Faith of a Physicist, p. 33.Google Scholar
24. Polkinghorne, Faith of a Physicist, p. 120.Google Scholar
25. Polkinghorne, Faith of a Physicist, p. 135.Google Scholar
26. Polkinghorne, Faith of a Physicist, pp. 64–65.Google Scholar
27. Polkinghorne, Faith of a Physicist, p. 86. The language of stewardship is, as Norman Habel points out, rather more problematic than Polkinghorne allows; see Habel, N., ‘Geophany: The Earth Story in Genesis 1’, in N. Habel and S. Wurst (eds.), The Earth Story in Genesis (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000), pp. 46–47; and N. Habel, The Birth, the Curse and the Greening of Earth: An Ecological Reading of Genesis 1–11 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2011).Google Scholar
28. Polkinghorne, Faith of a Physicist, p. 87.Google Scholar
29. Peacocke, A., Theology for a Scientific Age (enlarged edn; London: SCM Press, 1990), p. 234.Google Scholar
30. Peacocke, Scientific Age, pp. 214–48.Google Scholar
31. Peacocke, Scientific Age, p. 254.Google Scholar
32. Southgate, C.et al., God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1999), pp. 261–267.Google Scholar
33. Northcott, M., A Moral Climate: The Ethics of Global Warming (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2007), p. 69.Google Scholar
34. Northcott, Moral Climate, pp. 64–65.Google Scholar
35. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 65.Google Scholar
36. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 116.Google Scholar
37. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 117.Google Scholar
38. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 143.Google Scholar
39. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 173.Google Scholar
40. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 177.Google Scholar
41. Northcott, Moral Climate, p. 274.Google Scholar
42. Westcott, B.F., ‘The Gospel of Creation’, in The Epistles of St John: the Greek Text with Notes and Essays (London: Macmillan, 2nd edn, 1886), pp. 285–328.Google Scholar
43. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 287.Google Scholar
44. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 288.Google Scholar
45. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 288.Google Scholar
46. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 289.Google Scholar
47. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 293.Google Scholar
48. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, pp. 308–12.Google Scholar
49. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, pp. 313–15.Google Scholar
50. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 315.Google Scholar
51. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. x.Google Scholar
52. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. xi.Google Scholar
53. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, pp. 317–28.Google Scholar
54. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 319.Google Scholar
55. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 319.Google Scholar
56. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 319, n. 1.Google Scholar
57. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, pp. 319–20.Google Scholar
58. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 320.Google Scholar
59. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 321.Google Scholar
60. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 321.Google Scholar
61. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 322.Google Scholar
62. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 322.Google Scholar
63. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 323.Google Scholar
64. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 323.Google Scholar
65. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 323. Alan Cadwallader (personal communication, 24 April 2013) writes ‘Indeed this is part of the method drilled into BFW (and so many others in the mid 19th century) to build an account of every item of creation (it explains his hunt for samples of every fern, or rock, for his collection – all carefully labelled). Only by knowing the intricacies of the parts can we gain a sense of what the whole might look like (keeping open to the limitations on knowledge of course). This needless to say drove his grammatical analysis of the biblical text. He would find nuances in the aorist for example that escaped most mortals.’Google Scholar
66. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 323.Google Scholar
67. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, pp. 323–24.Google Scholar
68. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 324.Google Scholar
69. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 324.Google Scholar
70. Alan Cadwallader (personal communication, 24 April 2013) notes‘ “the overcoming of Satan” … has important implications for Westcott's thought, firstly in his essentially Origenist understanding of the personification of evil as a temporary aberration; secondly as a necessary call to redress (mainly social) evil as a participation in the restoration and perfecting that characterises God's activity; thirdly as a demonstration that the fundamental goodness of humanity, not the aberrations need to be affirmed through such social(ist) action. It explains why he was such a proponent of nineteenth century “cooperativism” (more on the Owen model than the Marxist, but dialoging with both).’Google Scholar
71. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 324.Google Scholar
72. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 325.Google Scholar
73. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 326.Google Scholar
74. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 327.Google Scholar
75. Westcott, ‘Gospel of Creation’, p. 328.Google Scholar
76. Patrick, English Parson Naturalist, p. 85.Google Scholar
77. L. White, ‘The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis’, at http://www.uvm.edu/~gflomenh/ENV-NGO-PA395/articles/Lynn-White.pdf (accessed 22 April 2013).Google Scholar
78. Patrick, English Parson Naturalist, p. 126. Cf. Westcott, , The Gospel of Life (London: Macmillan, 1892), pp. 96–97: ‘Even the rudest demon-worship contains the germ of this feeling by which the worshipper seeks to be at one with some power which is adverse to him. It is a witness to something in man by which he is naturally constituted to feel after a harmonious fellowship with all that of which he is conscious, with the unseen, with the infinite, no less than with the seen and the material’. I am very grateful to Dr Alan Cadwallader for this and a number of other additions and corrections to this paper.Google Scholar
79. Rowan Williams, ‘The Climate Crisis: A Christian Response’, Annual Lecture to Operation Noah, 13 October 2012, available at http://www.operationnoah.org/node/90 (accessed 19 April 2013).Google Scholar
80. Cited in Patrick, English Parson Naturalist, pp. 43–44.Google Scholar