Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:28:39.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peasants versus Capitalists in the Indian Sugar Industry: The Impact of the Irrigation Frontier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Donald W. Attwood
Get access

Abstract

Has the organization of commercial agriculture in the Third World been shaped primarily by external forces from the world economy? This study of sugar production in northern and western India shows that industrialists were generally unable to impose a plantation system on the local peasantry, despite the great technical and economic advantages of doing so. Control of the land, in most cases, did not pass into the hands of industrialists. The organization of crop production remained almost unchanged in the north, while in the west, despite initial progress toward a plantation system, the local cultivators responded by taking control of the industry into their own hands. Thus, contrary to experience in much of the New World, Indian villagers did not become passive victims of the sugar industry; those in the west went even further, in taking over the industry themselves. The contrast between these regions can be explained in part by the temporary existence of an “irrigation frontier” in the west.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , November 1985 , pp. 59 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Amin, Shahid. 1981. “Peasants and Capitalists in Northern India: Kisans in the Cane Commodity Circuit in Gorakhpur in the 1930s,” Journal of Peasant Studies 8:311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, Shahid. 1982. “Small Peasant Commodity Production and Rural Indebtedness: The Culture of Sugarcane in Eastern U.P., c. 1880–1920.” In Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society, ed. Guha, Ranajit, pp. 39–87. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amin, Shahid. 1984. Sugarcane and Sugar in Gorakhpur: An Inquiry into Peasant Production for Capitalist Enterprise in Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1974a. Political Entrepreneurs and Economic Development: Two Villages and a Taluka in Western India. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1974b. “Patrons and Mobilizers: Political Entrepreneurs in an Agrarian State.” Journal of Anthropological Research 30:225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1977. “Factions and Class Conflict in Rural Western India.” In A House Divided? Anthropological Studies of Factionalism, ed. Silverman, M. and Salisbury, R. F., pp. 171–96. St. John's: Memorial University of Newfoundland, Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1979a. “Why Some of the Poor Get Richer: Economic Change and Mobility in Rural Western India. ” Current Anthropology 20:495–508, 657–58 (with CA* comment, pp. 508–16).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1979b. “Conflict Cycles: The Interaction of Local and Regional Politics in India.” Man (n.s.) 14:145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1980. “Irrigation and Imperialism: The Impact of Irrigation on Economic Growth and Social Inequality in Western India.” Paper presented at the Harvard Institute for International Development, 18 April. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. 1984. “Capital and the Transformation of Agrarian Class Systems: Sugar Production in India.” In Agrarian Power and Agricultural Productivity in South Asia, ed. Desai, M., Rudolph, S. H. and Rudra, A., pp. 20–50. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attwood, Donald W. Forthcoming. “Poverty, Inequality and Economic Growth in Rural India.” In Power and Poverty: Development and Development Projects in the Third World, ed. Attwood, D. W., Bruneau, T. C. and Galaty, J. G..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Donald W., and Baviskar, B. S. 1985. “Why Do Some Cooperatives Work But Not Others? A Comparative Analysis of Sugar Cooperatives in India.” Washington: World Bank Staff Working Paper.Google Scholar
Batra, S. M. Forthcoming. “Agrarian Relations and Sugar Cooperatives in North India.” In Cooperatives and Rural Development, ed. Attwood, D. W. and Baviskar, B. S.. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baviskar, B. S. 1980. The Politics of Development: Sugar Co-Operatives in Rural Maharashtra. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baviskar, B. S., and Attwood, D. W. 1984. “Rural Co-operatives in India: A Comparative Analysis of Their Economic Survival and Social Impact.” Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) 18: 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belapur Company Ltd. 1956. “Souvenir Brochure to Mark the Occasion of the Visit to Harigaon of the Delegates to the Ninth Congress of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists.” Bombay: G. Claridge.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1965. Factional Politics in an Indian State: The Congress Party in Uttar Pradesh. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1980. “The Politicization of the Peasantry in a North Indian State.” Journal of Peasant Studies 7:395–426 and 8:3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Anthony T. 1974. Elite Politics in Rural India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deccan Canals Financial Improvement Committee (DCFIC). 1932. Report. Bombay: Government of Bombay.Google Scholar
Deccan Sugar Factories Association. 1967. Silver Jubilee Souvenir. Bombay: G. Claridge.Google Scholar
Dewey, Clive. 1978. “The End of the Imperialism of Free Trade: The Eclipse of the Lancashire Lobby and the Concession of Fiscal Autonomy to India.” In The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India, ed. Dewey, Clive and Hopkins, A. G., pp. 35–67. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Dutt, Romesh C. 1901. The Economic History of India under Early British Rule. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dutt, Romesh C. 1903. The Economic History of India in the Victorian Age. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. Palme. 1940. India Today. London: V. Gollancz.Google Scholar
Franda, Marcus. 1979. “All Is Not Sweet in Indian Sugar Politics.” Hanover, N.H.: American Universities Field Staff. Report No. 21, Asia.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder. 1969. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1963. Agricultural Involution: The Processes of Ecological Change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerra y Sanchez, Ramiro. 1964. Sugar and Society in the Caribbean: An Economic History of Cuban Agriculture. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, James Q. 1981. “The Sugar Economy.” In India: Demand and Supply Prospects for Agriculture. Washington: World Bank Staff Working Paper, no. 500.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Leon V. 1961. Marketing in an Underdeveloped Economy: The North Indian Sugar Industry. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Indian Sugar Committee (ISC). 1921. Report. Simla: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
Indian Sugar Mills Association. 1979–1980. Indian Sugar Year Book. New Delhi: Indian Sugar Mills Association.Google Scholar
Indian Tariff Board (ITB). 1938. Report of the Indian Tariff Board on the Sugar Industry. Delhi: Manager of Publications.Google Scholar
Inglis, C.C., and Gokhale, V. K.. 1928. “Note on the Outturn and Profit from Sugarcane Crops Grown in the Deccan Canal Tracts.” Bombay: Government Central Press. Technical Paper no. 21, Public Works Dept., Government of Bombay.Google Scholar
Inglis, C. C., and Gokhale, V. K.. 1934. “Development of Irrigation in the Deccan Canal Areas.” Bombay: Government Central Press. Technical Paper no. 49, Public Works Dept., Government of Bombay.Google Scholar
Irrigation Inquiry Committee (IIC). 1938. Report of the Irrigation Inquiry Committee Appointed by the Government of Bombay. Bombay: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
Kane, Vasant. 1959. Shetkaryanca Pahila Sakhar Karkhana: The Saswad Mali Sugar Factory Limited. Malinagar, Sholapur: Saswad Mali Sugar Factory.Google Scholar
Keatinge, G. 1921. Agricultural Progress in Western India. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1914. “Sugarcane, Its Cultivation, and Gul Manufacture.” Bombay: Government Central Press. Bull. no. 61, Dept. of Agriculture, Government of Bombay.Google Scholar
Krishna, Gopal. 1966. “The Development of the Indian National Congress as a Mass Organization, 1918–1923,” Journal of Asian Studies 25:413–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, Jayant. 1981. Elite Pluralism and Class Rule: Political Development in Maharashtra, India. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur. 1970. “The Export Stimulus.” In Tropical Development 1880–1913, ed. Arthur Lewis, W., pp. 13–45. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mann, Harold H., and Kanitkar, N. V.. 1921. Land and Labour in a Deccan Village: Study No. 2. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohite, Y. J. 1970. The Cooperative Movement in Maharashtra State: A Reappraisal. Bombay: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Ramkrishna. 1957. The Dynamics of a Rural Society. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Ramkrishna. 1958. The Rise and Fall of the East India Company. Berlin: Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Pandey, Prabha Shankar. N.d. Impact of Industrialization on the Rural Community. Delhi: Research Publications in Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Ramana Rao, T. C., et al. 1979. Indian Atlas of Sugarcane. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Donald B. 1977. The Expansive Elite: District Politics and State Policy-Making in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sahasrabudhe, G. N. 1914. “Note on Indian Sugar Industry and Modern Methods of Sugar Manufacture.” Bombay: Government Central Press. Bull. no. 60, Dept. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Shlomowitz, Ralph. 1984. “Plantations and Smallholdings: Comparative Perspectives from the World Cotton and Sugar Cane Economies, 1865–1939.” Agricultural History 58:1–16.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H., et al. 1956. The People of Puerto Rico. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Ian. 1979. “Canal Irrigation and Agrarian Change: The Experience of the Ganges Canal Tract, Muzaffarnagar District (U.P.), 1840–1900.” In Economy and Society: Essays in Indian Economic and Social History, ed. Chaudhuri, K. N. and Dewey, C. J., pp. 86–112. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Kit Sims. 1978. Sugar and the Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil, 1500–1970. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Verma, H. S. 1983. “Producers’ Cooperatives and Producers’ Interests: The Case of Cooperative Cane Development Unions in Uttar Pradesh.” Lucknow: Giri Institute of Development Studies. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whitcombe, Elizabeth. 1972. Agrarian Conditions in Northern India. Vol. I: The United Provinces Under British Rule, 1860–1900. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar