Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:13:03.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rome, China, and the Barbarians: Ethnographic Traditions and the Transformation of Empires. By Randolph B. Ford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xx, 369 pp. ISBN: 9781108473958 (cloth).

Review products

Rome, China, and the Barbarians: Ethnographic Traditions and the Transformation of Empires. By Randolph B. Ford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xx, 369 pp. ISBN: 9781108473958 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2021

Shao-yun Yang
Shao-yun Yang*
Affiliation:
Denison University
*
yangs@denison.edu
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews—Transnational and Comparative
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 824 - 827
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc., 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Note, though, that the barbarians who emerged as the leaders of Western Europe, the Franks, also falsified a narrative of descent from the Trojans, thereby creating a genealogical link to Rome without compromising their Frankish identity. I thank Anthony Kaldellis for this insight.

2 Whether this changed for Sogdians after the An Lushan Rebellion (755–63) is a matter of debate that I shall not dwell on here, but my position is that it did not.

3 Skaff, Jonathan Karam, Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580–800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 52–60.

4 For example, Yang, Shao-yun, “‘What Do Barbarians Know of Gratitude?’—The Stereotype of Barbarian Perfidy and Its Uses in Tang Foreign Policy Rhetoric,” Tang Studies 31 (2013): 28–74Google Scholar.

5 Rogers, Michael C., “The Myth of the Battle of the Fei River (A.D. 383),” T'oung Pao 54, no. 1 (1968): 50–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.