Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:52:53.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, “Legalism,” et cetera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Kidder Smith
Get access

Extract

Here's a short version: The “-ism” we invoke when we posit things like “Daoism” was glimpsed for the first time by Sima Tan . (d. 110 b.c.e.), lord grand astrologer (taishigong) to the Han court. His essay “Yaozhi” (Essential points), included in the final chapter of his son Sima Qian's Taishigong, analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of six approaches to governance:

Yinyang ,

Ru (known to us as Confucians),

Mo (the Mohists),

Fajia (called Legalists),

Mingjia (called Sophists), and

Daojia (or Daode , the supposed Daoists).

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 2003 , pp. 129 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Boltz, W. G. 1994. The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Connery, C. 1998. The Empire of the Text: Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Creel, H. 1970. “The Fa-chia: ‘Legalists’ or ‘Administrators’?” In What is Taoism? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1994. “Emulating the Yellow Emperor: The Theory and Practice of Huang Lao.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1997. “Yue Chengong and the Invention of Traditions in Han China.” Paper presented at the workshop “Intellectual Lineages in Pre-Imperial China,” University of Pennsylvania. September.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Nylan, M.. 2003. “Constructing Lineages and Inventing Traditions in the Shiji.” Forthcoming, T'oung Pao.Google Scholar
De Bary, W. T., and Bloom, I., eds. 1999. Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Defoort, C. 1997. The Pheasant Hat Master. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Denma Translation Group, trans. 2001. The Art of War: A New Translation. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
Durrant, S. 1995. The Cloudy Mirror: Tension and Conflict in the Writings of Sima Qian. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Duyvendak, J. J. L. 1928. The Book of Lord Shang. London: Arthur Probsthain.Google Scholar
Fukui, S.. 1970. “ZenKan ni okeru Bokka no zaishö” (The revival of Mohism in former Han). Tōhōgaku 39:1–18.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 1978. Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. Hong Kong: The Chinese Uni versity Press.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C., trans. 1981. Chuang-Tzu, The Inner Chapters. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Grant, F. C. 1953. Hellenistic Religions—The Age of Syncretism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zhongmin, Han. 1988. “Cong Lüshi chunqiu dao Huainanzi” (From the Lüshi chunqiu to the Huainanzi). In Zhongguo shuji biancuan shigao . Beijing: Zhongguo shuji.Google Scholar
Hanfeizi jijie (Collected explications of the Hanfeizi). 1998. Edited by Wang Xianzhen . Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, C. 1998. Language and Logic. Vol. 7, pt. 1 of Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. 1993. “Form and Narrative in Ssu-ma Ch'ien's Shih chi.” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews 14:1–23.Google Scholar
Harper, D. 1996. Early China News: 14–15. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China.Google Scholar
Harvard-Yenching Institute Sing-Logical Index Series. 1966. A Concordance to Yi Ching. Supplement no. 10. Taipei: Chinese Materials Center.Google Scholar
Hucker, C. 1986. A Dictionary of Official Titles in Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Knoblock, J., trans. 1988. Xunzi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblock, J., and Riegel, J., trans. 2000. The Annals of Lü Buwei. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. 1988. “Metaphor and Social Antagonisms.” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C., trans. 1970. Mencius. Hammondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Liu, X. 1994. Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Chinese Studies.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, M. 1993. Early Chinese Texts. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China.Google Scholar
Loewe, M. 1994. “Imperial Sovereignty: Tung Chung-shu's Contribution and his Predecessors.” In Divination, Mythology, and Monarchy in Han China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lunheng jiaoshi (“Discourses weighed in the balance,” edited and explained). 1990. Edited by Huang Hui . Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Lüshi chunqiu jiaoshi (“Master Lü's springs and autumns,” edited and explained). 1984. Edited by Chen Qi . Shanghai: Xuelin.Google Scholar
Makeham, J. 1990–1991. “The Legalist Concept of Hsing-Ming.” Monumenta Serica 39:87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makeham, J. 1994. Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Needham, J., and Yates, R. D. S.. 1995. Military Technology: Missiles and Sieges. Vol. 5, pt. 6 of Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 1993. The Canon of Supreme Mystery by Yang Hsiung. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 1999. “Textualization in Han Times.” Paper presented at the fifty-first annual meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, Boston.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 2001. “Sima Qian: A True Historian?” Early China 23–24:203–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, R. P. 1993. Law and Morality in Ancient China: The Silk Manuscripts of Huang-Lao. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. Ø. 1995. “Which Books Did the First Emperor of Ch'in Burn? On the Meaning of Pai Chia in Early Chinese Sources.” Monumenta Serica 43:1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, W. 1994. “Ssu-ma Ch'ien as Cultural Historian.” In The Power of Culture—Studies in Chinese Cultural History, edited by Peterson, W. J. et al. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Xigui, Qiu. 1993. “Mawangdui boshu Laozi yiben juanqian guyishu bingfei Huangdi sijing” (The recovered text preceding the second Laozi in the Mawangdui silk manuscript is definitely not the Huangdi sijing). In Daojia wenhua yanjiu . Shanghai: Shanghai guji, 249–53. Reprinted in Qiu Xigui xueshu wenhua suibi . Beijing: Zhongguo qingnian, 1999.Google Scholar
Queen, S. Forthcoming. “Inventories of the Past: Rethinking the ‘School’ Affiliations of the Huainanzi.” Asia Major.Google Scholar
Jiyu, Ren. 1981. “XianQin zhexue wu ‘liujia’” (Therewere no “Six Jia” in pre-Qin period philosophy). Reprinted in Zhongguo zhexue shilun . Shanghai: Shanghai renmin.Google Scholar
Roth, H. 1991a. “Psychology and Self-Cultivation in Early Taoistic Thought.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 51:599–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, H. 1991b. “Who Compiled the Chuang Tzu?” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by Rosemont, H.. LaSalle, Ill: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Roth, H. 1999. Original Tao: Inward Training (nei-yeh) and the Foundations of Taoist Mysticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ryden, E. 1996. “Was Confucius a Confucian? Confusion over the Use of the Term ‘School’ in Chinese Philosophy.” Early China News 9:5–9, 28–29.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, A. 1969. La divinisation de Lao Tseu dans le taoisme des Han (The divinization of Laozi in Han Daoism). Paris: École française d'extrême-orient.Google Scholar
Shun, K. 1993. “Jen and Li in the Analects.’ Philosophy East and West 43(3):457–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Sima. 1959. Shiji (Records of the grand historian). Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Sivin, N. 1969. “Cosmos and Computation in Early Chinese Mathematical Astronomy.” T'oung Pao 55:1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivin, N. 1995a. “The Myth of the Naturalists.” In Medicine, Philosophy, and Religion in Ancient China. Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum Books.Google Scholar
Sivin, N. 1995b. “State, Cosmos, and Body in the Last Three Centuries B.C.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 55(1): 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivin, N. 1995c. “Text and Experience in Classical Chinese Medicine.” In Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, edited by Bates, Don. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. 1989. “Zhouyi Divination from Accounts in the Zuozhuan.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 49:421–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, W. 1979. “The ‘Thought of Huang-Lao’: A Reflection on the Lao Tzu and Huang Ti Texts in the Silk Manuscripts of Ma-wang-tui.” Journal of Asian Studies 39(1):95–110.Google Scholar
Twitchett, Denis C., and Loewe, Michael. 1986. The Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 B.C.–A.D. 220. Vol. 1 of The Cambridge History of China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Ess, H. 1993. “The Meaning of Huang-Lao in Shiji and Hanshu.” Études chinoises 12(2):161–77.Google Scholar
Van Zoeren, S. 1991. Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vandermeersch, L. 1965. La formation du légisme: Recherche sur la constitution d'une philosophie politique caractéristique de la Chine ancienne. Paris: École française d'extrême-orient.Google Scholar
Wang, A. 2000. Cosmology and Political Culture in Early China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Wang. 1982. Tongyuan zidian (A dictionary of cognates). Beijing: Shangwu.Google Scholar
Liqi, Wang. 1989. “Jia-ren duiwen jie” (Explanations of the relationship of jia and ren). In Xiaochuan shuzhai wenshi lunji . Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, B. 1958. Ssu-ma Ch'ien, Grand Historian of China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jiulong, Wu, et al. 1990. Sunzi jiaoshi (The Art of War, collated and explained). Beijing: Junshi kexue.Google Scholar
Xing, Wen. 2000. “Scholarship on the Guodian Texts in China.” In The Guodian Laozi, edited by Allen, S. and Williams, C.. Betkeley: Society for the Study of Early China and the Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Xunzi jijie (Collected explications of the Xunzi). 1988. Edited by Wang Xianqian . Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Yates, R. D. S. 1980. “The City Under Siege: Technology and Organization as seen in the Reconstructed Text of the Military Chapters of Mo-tzu.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Yates, R. D. S. 1988. “New Light on Ancient Chinese Military Texts.” T'oung Pao 74:211–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, R. D. S. 1994. “The Yin-Yang Texts From Yinqueshan.” Early China 19:75–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiaxi, Yu. 1985. “An zhulu” (On the records of texts). In Gushu tongli . Shanghai: Shanghai guji.Google Scholar
Yingshi, Yu. 1959. Han Jin zijishi zhi xin zijue yu xin sichao (The new self-awareness and new currents of thought in the self-reflections of Han and Jin times). Kowloon: New Asia Press.Google Scholar
Zhanguoce zhuyi (Notes and translation of “The intrigues of the Warring States”). 1990. He Jianzhang . Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Dake, Zhang. 1985. Shiji yanjiu (Researches on “The historical records”). Lanzhou: Gansu renmin.Google Scholar
Liangshu, Zheng (Tai Lian-soo) , ed. 1982. Shiji jiaozheng (A critical edition of the Shiji). Academia Sinica: Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, vol. 78.Google Scholar
Zhuangzi jishi (Collected explanations of the Zhuangzi). 1961. Edited by Guo Qingfan . Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Zufferey, N. 1998. “Érudits et lettrés au début de la dynastie Han” (Erudites and men of letters at the beginning of the Han). Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 52(3):915–65.Google Scholar