Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:52:35.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Worldly Affiliations: Artistic Practice, National Identity, and Modernism in India, 1930–1990. By Sonal Khullar. Oakland: University of California Press, 2015. xiii, 352 pp.

Review products

Worldly Affiliations: Artistic Practice, National Identity, and Modernism in India, 1930–1990. By Sonal Khullar. Oakland: University of California Press, 2015. xiii, 352 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2019

Preminda Jacob
Preminda Jacob*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
*
premindajacob@umbc.edu
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews—South Asia
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 472 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Worldly Affiliations extends and refocuses scholarly attention on the subject of modern and contemporary visual art in South Asia by setting up a conversation with previous book-length, critical analyses of the subject, most notably by: Kapur, Geeta, Contemporary Indian Artists (New Delhi: Vikas, 1978)Google Scholar and When Was Modernism: Essays on Contemporary Cultural Practice in India (New Delhi: Tulika, 2000); Mitter, Partha, The Triumph of Modernism: India's Artists and the Avant-Garde, 1922–1947 (London: Reaktion, 2007)Google Scholar; Brown, Rebecca M., Art for a Modern India, 1947–1980 (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dadi, Iftikhar, Modernism and the Art of Muslim South Asia (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Mathur, Saloni, “A Retake of Sher-Gil's Self-Portrait as Tahitian,” Critical Inquiry 37, no. 3 (2011): 515–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Citron, Beth, “Bhupen Khakhar's ‘Pop’ in India, 1970–72,” Art Journal 71, no. 2 (2012): 44–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Together, these texts unfold the complexity, depth, and diversity of the subject of South Asian modern and contemporary art while also indexing gaps in the subject matter that hold the potential for additional scholarly research on visual artists, art practices, regional trends, and artistic movements of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries in South Asia.

2 See Geeta Kapur, “Mid-Century Ironies: K.G. Subramanyan,” in When Was Modernism, op. cit. note 1, 87–144.