Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:54:19.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adding Value with Benefit-Cost Analysis: Forecasting Net Social Benefit from Impacts of Slot Machine Gambling in Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2015

Scott Farrow
Scott Farrow*
Affiliation:
UMBC, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA, e-mail: farrow@umbc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The estimated impacts, benefits, and costs of legalizing slot machines in Maryland are analyzed building on and contrasting with results from an impact analysis. The analysis provides estimates of the components and the total net benefits to the state and its citizens; the role of uncertainty, distributional impacts, and a basic tax alternative. The results forecast mostly positive net benefits for Maryland both in comparison to doing nothing and in comparison to raising an equivalent amount in taxes. However, if slot revenue raised from the lower income population is given more weight, then doing nothing or raising taxes appears to be preferred.

Keywords

D6H3A1benefit-costgamblingregionalriskslots
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 281 - 304
Copyright
© Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Matthew (2008). Risk Equity: A New Proposal. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 32(1), 1–47.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Society(2010). DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)-V Development, available at http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=210#.Google Scholar
Anielski, Mark & Braaten, Aaron(2008). The Socio-economic Impact of Gambling (SEIG) Framework. Anielski Management, Inc. Available at http://www.anielski.com/Documents/SEIG%20Framework.pdf.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth, Cropper, Maureen, Eads, George, Hahn, Robert, Lave, Lester, Knoll, Roger, Portney, Paul, Russell, Milton, Schmalensee, Richard, Kerry Smith, V. & Stavins, Robert (1996). Is There a Role for Benefit–Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation? Science, 272(April), 221–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Productivity Commission(1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries, Report 10, November. A 2009 draft report is available at http://pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/?a=91545.Google Scholar
Bartik, Timothy (2012). Including Jobs in Benefit-Cost Analysis. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, Douglas & Rangel, Antonio (2007). Behavioral Public Economics: Welfare and Policy Analysis with Non-Standard Decision-Makers. In Diamond, Peter & Vartiainen, Hannu (Eds.), Economic Institutions and Behavioral Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boardman, Anthony, Greenberg, David, Vining, Aiden & Weimer, David (2011). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Robert, Perlman, Evan & Norris, Don (2010). Cashing In: Who Pays for the Maryland Lottery? Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 4(1), 31–52.Google Scholar
Carrigan, Christopher & Shapiro, Stuart(2014). What’s Wrong with the Back of the Envelope? A Call for Simple (and Timely) Benefit-Cost Analysis. George Washington University, Working Paper. Available at http://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/whats-wrong-back-envelope-call-simple-and-timely-benefit-cost-analysis.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj (2009). Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced Form Methods. In Arrow, K. & Bresnahan, T. (Eds.), Annual Review of Economics (Vol. 1). Palo Alto: Annuals Reviews.Google Scholar
Coate, Stephen (2000). An Efficiency Approach to the Evaluation of Policy Changes. Economic Journal, 110(April), 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlisk, John (1993). The Utility of Gambling. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6.Google Scholar
Department of Legislative Services (DLS)Office of Policy Analysis, State of Maryland, 2008. Update of the Legislator’s Guide to Video Lottery Terminal Gambling; accessible at http://mlis.state.md.us.Google Scholar
Farrow, Scott (2011). Incorporating Distributional Analysis into Benefit-Cost Analysis Using Risk Based Preferences. Risk Analysis, 31(6), 902–907.Google Scholar
Farrow, Scott (2012). A Missing Error Term in Benefit-Cost Analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(5), 2523–2528.Google Scholar
Farrow, Scott & Carter, Chava (2013). The Benefit-Cost Analysis of Slot Machine Gambling. In Vaughn-Williams, Leighton & Seigel, Don (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Economics of Gambling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Florio, Massimo (2014). Applied Welfare Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Projects and Policies. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence & Williams, Roberton, III (2003). The Substantial Bias from Ignoring General Equilibrium Effects in Estimating Excess Burden, and a Practical Solution. Journal of Political Economy, 111(4), 898–927.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office (GAO)(2005). Economic Performance: Highlights of a Workshop on Economic Performance Measures. GAO-05-796SP. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Grinols, Earl L. (2004). Gambling in America: Costs and Benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haveman, R. & Krutilla, J. (1967). Unemployment, Excess Capacity, and Benefit-Cost Criteria. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(3), 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haveman, R. & Farrow, S. (2011). Benefit-Cost Accounting for Labor in Times of High Unemployment. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(2), #7.Google Scholar
Haveman, R. & Weimer, D. (2015). Public Policy Induced Changes in Employment: Valuation Issues for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6(1), 112–153.Google Scholar
Hines, J. (1999). The Three Sides of the Harberger Triangle. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 167–188.Google Scholar
HM Treasury(2009) The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. Accessed June 8, 2009 at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/data_greenbook_index.htm.Google Scholar
Jin, L, Kenkel, D., Liu, F. & Wang, H. (2015). Retrospective and Prospective Benefit-Cost Analyses of U.S. Anti-Smoking Policies. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6(1), 154–186.Google Scholar
Just, R., Hueth, D. & Schimtz, A. (2004). The Welfare Economics of Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kopits, E., McGartland, A., Morgan, C., Pasurka, C., Shadbegian, R., Simon, N., Simpson, D. & Wolverton, A. (2014). Retrospective Cost Analysis of EPA Regulations: A Case Study Approach. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
Maryland Department of Planning(2011). Income Inequality Continues to Grow, available at http://planning.maryland.gov/msdc/income_inequality/incomeinequality_1980_2000.pdf .Google Scholar
Maryland, Gaming(2015). Financial Reporting Year to Date. State of Maryland. Available at http://gaming.mdlottery.com/financial-reporting/.Google Scholar
OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget)(1992). Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. OMB Circular A-94, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget)(2003). Regulatory Analysis. OMB Circular A-4, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Palisade@Risk, Version 5.5. Available at http://www.palisade.com/risk/.Google Scholar
Rose, Adam(1998). The Regional Impact of Casino Gambling: Assessment of the Literature and Establishment of a Research Agenda: Final Draft. Research report prepared for the U.S. National Gambling Impact Study Commission, available at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ngisc/reports/res-rpts.html.Google Scholar
Shinogle, Judith, Carpenter, Robert, Farrow, Scott & Norris, Donald F.(2008). An Analysis of the Impact of Introducing Video Lottery Terminals in Maryland. Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research (MIPAR), October 14. Available at http://www.umbc.edu/mipar/Documents/Impact%20of%20Introducing%20Video%20Lottery%20Terminals%20FINAL.pdf .Google Scholar
Shinogle, Judith, Norris, Donald F., Park, DoHwan, Volberg, Rachel, Haynes, Donald & Stokan, Eric(2011). Gambling Prevalence in Maryland: A Baseline Analysis. Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research, UMBC, Baltimore. Available at http://www.umbc.edu/mipar/research.php#research .Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (Alemavehu Bishaw and Jessica Semega)(2008a). Income, Earnings, and Poverty Data from the 2007 American Community Survey. Available at www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/acs-09.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (Carmen DeNavis-Wait, Bernadette Proctor, and Jessica Smith)(2008b). Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States. Available at www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau(2010). Statistical Abstract. Table 737 (Corporations-Selected Financial Items), accessed February 11, 2010 at http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2010/tables/10s0737.xls .Google Scholar
Vining, Aiden & Boardman, Anthony (2006). Metachoice in Policy Analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas (2007). Problems in quantifying the social costs and benefits of gambling. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(3).Google Scholar
Washington Post(2008). “No on Slots”, Editorial, October 19. Available online at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/18/AR2008101801534.html.Google Scholar
Weimer, David, Vining, Aidan & Thomas, Randall (2009). Cost-Benefit Analysis Involving Addictive Goods: Contingent Valuation for Willingness-to-Pay for Smoking Cessation. Health Economics, 18(2), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whalley, John (1975). How Reliable is Partial Equilibrium Analysis? Review of Economics and Statistics, 57(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbe, Richard & Dively, Dwight (1994). Benefit-Cost Analysis in Theory and Practice. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Richard Jr. (2001). Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Farrow supplementary material

Farrow supplementary material 1

Download Farrow supplementary material(File)
File 112.9 KB