Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:54:16.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE APPARENT NON-SIGNIFICANCE OF SEX IN CHILD UNDERNUTRITION IN INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Simantini Mukhopadhyay
Simantini Mukhopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Institute of Development Studies, Kolkata, India
*
1Email: simantinihalder@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The lack of significance of sex in the determination of child nutrition in India, as revealed from the analysis of data from the entire population, is misleading and perplexing. Given that child nutrition is affected by all channels through which sex bias operates, scholars have sought to explain its inconclusive evidence, looking at child-specific household-level factors such as birth order and sex composition of surviving older siblings. The paper points out that sex inequality needs to be examined in the context of its intersection with other consequential social identities such as religious membership, economic status and caste group affiliation. Sex disparity in child stunting is found to be prevalent particularly among upper caste Hindus. However, the relative advantage that poor tribal girls enjoy is reversed with improvement in wealth status. Thus, children in different social settings need customized policy focus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 267 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdullah, M. & Wheeler, E. F. (1985) Seasonal variations and the intra-household distribution of food in a Bangladeshi village. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 41(6), 1305–1313.Google Scholar
Agnihotri, S. (2000) Sex Ratio Patterns in the Indian Population: A Fresh Exploration. Sage, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. (2003) Why dowries payments declined with modernization in Europe but are rising in India. Journal of Political Economy 111(2), 269–310.Google Scholar
Arnold, F. (2001) Son preference in south Asia. In Sathar, Z. A. & Phillips, J. F. (eds) Fertility Transition in South Asia. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 281–299.Google Scholar
Arnold, F., Choe, M. K. & Roy, T. K. (1998) Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies 52, 301–315.Google Scholar
Arnold, F., Kishor, S. & Roy, T. K. (2002) Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review 28(4), 1–28.Google Scholar
Bharati, S., Pal, M. & Bharati, P. (2008) Determinants of nutritional status of pre-school children in India. Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 801–814.Google Scholar
Borooah, V. K. (2005) The height-for-age of Indian children. Economics and Human Biology 3, 45–65.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, T. & Kim, S. (2010) Kinship institutions and sex ratios in India. Demography 47(4), 989–1012.Google Scholar
Chen, L. C., Huq, E. & D’Souza, S. (1981) Sex bias in the family allocation of food and health care in rural Bangladesh. Population and Development Review 7(1), 55–70.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory & Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum.Google Scholar
DHS Programme (2015) The DHS Programme: Demographic and Health Surveys. URL: http://www.dhsprogram.com Google Scholar
Das Gupta, M. (1987) Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab. Population and Development Review 13(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W. & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003) Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies 40, 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (2008) Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 9(1), 67–85.Google Scholar
Desai, S. B., Rastogi, S. & Vanneman, R. (2005) Gender differences in child survival in India: What do we know? International Union for the Scientific Study of Population XXV International Population Conference, Tours, France, 18–23rd July 2005.Google Scholar
Gaudin, S. (2011) Son preference in Indian families: absolute versus relative wealth effects. Demography 48(1), 343–370.Google Scholar
Glenn, E. N. (1999) The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: an integrative framework. In Ferree, M. M., Lorber, J. & Hess, B. B. (eds) Revisioning Gender. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, Delhi. pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
IIPS & ORC Macro (2007) National Family Health Survey 2005–06 (NFHS-3). IIPS, Mumbai, India.Google Scholar
Iyer, A., Sen, G. & George, A. (2007) The dynamics of gender and class in access to health care: evidence from rural Karnataka, India. International Journal of Health Services 37, 537–554.Google Scholar
Jayachandran, S. & Pande, R. (2013) Choice not genes: probable cause for the India–Africa child height gap. Economic and Political Weekly xlviii(34), 77–79.Google Scholar
Jha, P., Kesler, M. A., Kumar, R., Ram, F., Ram, U., Aleksandrowicz, L. et al. (2011) Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. The Lancet 377(9781), 1921–1928.Google Scholar
Kanbur, R. (2006) The policy significance of inequality decompositions. Journal of Economic Inequality 4, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnaji, N. (1987) Poverty and sex ratio – some data and speculations. Economic and Political Weekly xxii(23), 892–897.Google Scholar
Lin, T. & Adsera, A. (2012) Son preference and children’s housework: the case of India. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6929.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, D. G. (1970) Society in India. Two volumes. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Marcoux, A. (2002) Sex differentials in undernutrition: a look at survey evidence. Population and Development Review 28(2), 275–284.Google Scholar
Miller, B. D. (1981) The Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Mishra, V., Lahiri, S. & Luther, N. Y. (1999) Child Nutrition in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports No. 14. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai; and East-West Center Program on Population, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Mishra, V., Roy, T. K. & Retherford, R. D. (2004) Sex differentials in childhood feeding, health care & nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review 30(2), 269–295.Google Scholar
Muhuri, P. K. & Preston, S. H. (1991) Effects of family composition on mortality differentials by sex among children in Matlab, Bangladesh. Population and Development Review 17(3), 415–434.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, S. (2013) Do public services reach the worst affected children in rural India? An investigation applying the quantile regression method. Child Indicators Research 6(3), 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östlin, P. (2002) Gender perspective on socioeconomic inequalities in health. In Machenbach, J. P. & Bakker, M. J. (eds) Reducing Inequalities in Health: A European Perspective. Routledge, London and New York. pp. 315–324.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2003) Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings. Demography 40(3), 395–418.Google Scholar
Pande, R. & Astone, N. M. (2007) Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review 26(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. & Sengupta, S. (1983) Malnutrition of rural children and the sex bias. Economic and Political Weekly. 855–864.Google Scholar
Sen, G. & Iyer, A. (2012) Who gains, who loses and how: leveraging gender and class intersections to secure health entitlements. Social Science & Medicine 74(11), 1802–1811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, G., Iyer, A. & George, A. (2007) Systematic hierarchies and systemic failures: gender and health inequities in Koppal district. Economic and Political Weekly XLII, 682–690.Google Scholar
Sen, G., Iyer, A. & Mukherjee, C. (2009) A methodology to analyse the intersections of social inequalities in health. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 10(3), 397–415.Google Scholar
Sommerfelt, A. E. & Arnold, F. (1998) Sex differentials in nutritional status of young children. In United Nations (ed.) Too Young to Die: Genes or Gender? Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations, New York. pp. 133–353.Google Scholar
Spears, D. (2013) How much international variation in child height can sanitation explain? Princeton Research Program in Development Studies Working Paper.Google Scholar
Tarozzi, A. & Mahajan, A. (2007) Child nutrition in India in the nineties. Economic Development and Cultural Change 55(3), 441–486.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2013) Monitoring the Situation of Women and Children. Statistics by Area, Child Nutrition. URL: http://www.childinfo.org/undernutrition_weightbackground.php (accessed 21st August 2013).Google Scholar
Whittle, K. L. & Inhorn, M. C. (2001) Rethinking difference: a feminist reframing of gender/race/class for the improvement of women’s health research. International Journal of Health Services 31, 147–165.Google Scholar