Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:08:54.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Philosophical and Religious Thought of Arthur James Balfour (1848-1930)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

John David Root
John David Root*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alec R. Vidler recently remarked that “It is because he was at least two men that Balfour is the most interesting Prime Minister of this century.” He was both a man of political action and a philosopher. In the opinion of Sir Austen Chamberlain, Balfour had “the finest brain that has been applied to politics in our time.” Blanche Dugdale adds that “No one can understand Arthur Balfour who forgets that interest in speculative thinking was part of the fabric of his everyday existence, wherever he was, whatever he was doing.” But no matter that Balfour's involvement in philosophy, theology, science, and psychical research often superseded his active involvement in the affairs of state. The image of a dilettante persists in most biographical studies. One of the reasons for this historiographical problem was stated well in an early biographical sketch:

… Balfour's real achievement as a metaphysician is not easy to determine, and none the more that his fame as a statesman tended to advertise his work with the vulgar and depreciate it with the elect. The former took him at his word and proclaimed him without further ado a philosopher; the latter dismissed him without too much consideration as an amateur.

Whether “vulgar” or “elect,” the public was slow to appreciate the mind of Arthur Balfour. It was not until the publication of his second book, The Foundations of Belief (1895), that Balfour received critical attention as a thinker.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , Spring 1980 , pp. 120 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A briefer version of this paper was presented at the Midwestern Conference on British Studies, October 1978. Research was facilitated by a financial grant from the American Philosophical Society in 1976.

1 Vidler, Alec R., Scenes from a Clerical Life (London, 1977), p. 172Google Scholar.

2 Quoted in Tuchman, Barbara, The Proud Tower; A Portrait of Europe Before the War: 1890-1914 (New York, 1967), p. 53Google Scholar.

3 Dugdale, Blanche E.C., Arthur James Balfour (New York, 1934), I, 13Google Scholar. Despite this strong statement, Dugdale rarely mentions Balfour's philosophical activities in her two-volume work. Appended to the second volume, however, is a chapter, “Notes on Lord Balfour's Philosophy,” written by Andrew Seth Pringle-Pattison, whom Balfour himself had recommended for the task.

4 Most biographies have treated Balfour's intellectual life in anecdotal fashion. A major exception to the rule is Young's, KennethArthur James Balfour (London, 1963)Google Scholar, which deals extensively with the general outlines of Balfour's thought and is sensitive to its importance as an integral part of his life.

5 Cecil, A., “Arthur James Balfour,” Dictionary of National Biography, Supplement, 1922-1930 (London, 1931), p. 43Google Scholar.

6 Chadwick, Owen, The Victorian Church (London, 1966 and 1970), II: 424Google Scholar.

7 Martineau, James, “The Foundations of Belief,” Nineteenth Century, XXXVII: (1895):552Google Scholar.

8 Tuchman, , Proud Tower, p. 54Google Scholar.

9 Balfour, Arthur James, Chapters of Autobiography, Dugdale, Blanche (ed.), (London, 1930), pp. xxii, 17Google Scholar.

10 Esher, Reginald Brett Viscount, Journals and Letters (London, 1934–1948), I, 183Google Scholar.

11 Balfour, , Autobiography, p. 55Google Scholar; Balfour, , Theism and Humanism (London, 1915), p. 137Google Scholar.

12 Balfour, , Autobiography, p. 59Google Scholar.

13 Dugdale, , Balfour, I, 21Google Scholar.

14 Balfour, Arthur James, A Defence of Philosophic Doubt (London, 1879), p. vGoogle Scholar.

15 Ibid., p. vi.

16 Ibid., p. 73.

17 Ibid., p. 84.

18 Ibid., p. 242.

19 Ibid., pp. 319-20.

20 Ibid., p. 323.

21 Young, , Balfour, p. 52Google Scholar. The Roman Catholic editor, William George Ward, greeted Defence as a “healthy reaction” against the “Antitheistic Philosophy.” “In fact,” wrote Ward, “we should be a good deal surprised, if this work do [sic] not originate a new era in English Philosophy.” Ward, W.G., review of Defence, Dublin Review, 3rd ser., 3 (January, 1880), 269Google Scholar.

22 Bolo, Balfour to Oliver Lodge, 15 April 1899, Add. Mss 49798.88.

23 Balfour, , Autobiography, pp. 66–67Google Scholar; Young, , Balfour, p. 50Google Scholar.

24 Young, , Balfour, p. 51Google Scholar.

25 Quoted in Tuchman, , Proud Tower, p. 21Google Scholar.

26 Esher, , Journals and Letters, I, 183Google Scholar.

27 Quoted in Young, , Balfour, pp. 140–41Google Scholar.

28 See Gauld, Alan, The Founders of Pyschical Research (New York, 1968)Google Scholar.

29 Hynes, Samuel, The Edwardian Turn of Mind (Princeton 1968), pp. 140, 145Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., p. 145.

31 Young, , Balfour, p. 146Google Scholar.

32 Ibid., 146.

33 Balfour, Arthur James, “Psychical Research,” in Essays Speculative and Political (London, 1920), p. 175Google Scholar.

34 bid., 190.

35 Turner, Frank Miller, Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England (New York and London, 1974), p. 11nGoogle Scholar. The men studied by Turner include Sidgwick, Myers, James Ward, George Romanes, and Samuel Butler.

36 In Dugdale, , Balfour, IIGoogle Scholar, Appendix I, 319.

37 Balfour, Arthur James, The Foundations of Belief (London, 1895), pp. 1–7Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., pp. 185-232.

39 Ibid., p. 234.

40 Balfour's, Arthur James “Summary,” Foundations (8th ed., London, 1902), p. 385Google Scholar.

41 Ibid.

42 Balfour, , Foundations (1895), pp. 323–33Google Scholar.

43 Ibid., pp. 323-24.

44 Balfour, , “Summary,” Foundations (1902), p. 389Google Scholar.

45 James, Henry (ed.), Letters of William James (Boston, 1926), II, 20Google Scholar. Letter dated 26 April 1895.

46 Caldecott, Alfred, The Philosophy of Religion in England and America (New York, 1901), p. 175Google Scholar.

47 Martineau, , “Foundations,” Nineteenth Century, XXXVII (1895):552–66Google Scholar.

48 Spencer, Herbert, “Mr. Balfour's Dialectics,” Fornightly Review, LXIII (1895):869Google Scholar.

49 Conversation reported in Ward, Wilfrid, Problems and Persons (London, 1903), p. 253Google Scholar.

50 Huxley, Thomas Henry, “Mr. Balfour's Attack on Agnosticism,” Nineteenth Century, XXXVII (1895): 533Google Scholar. A scheduled second article on Balfour did not appear. The distinguished physicist, Oliver Lodge, commented on Huxley's review: “The breezy egoism which in his writings is usually refreshing, is in this specimen rather over apparent.” Lodge, , “Mr. Balfour's Attack on the Current Philosophy of Modern Science,” The Liverpool Pulpit, IV (1895):92Google Scholar.

51 Esher, , Journals and Letters, I, 183Google Scholar.

52 St. Andrews University (SAUL), George Tyrrell to Wilfrid Ward, June 1899, Ward Family Papers (WFP).

53 Tyrrell, George, “Mr. Balfour and the Foundations of Belief, I,” The Month, LXXXIII (1895):468Google Scholar.

54 Tyrrell, , “Mr. Balfour, II,” The Month, LXXXIII (1895): 17Google Scholar.

55 Ibid.

56 Ibid., p. 29. The Reverend William Barry also reviewed Balfour, commenting, “I am reminded of a witty saying I heard upon occasion, to the effect that ‘Science and Religion are both false; but Religion is not quite so false as Science;’” Barry, , “Mr. Balfour's Philosophy,” Dublin Review, 4th ser., VIII (1895): 129–30Google Scholar.

57 (Ward, Wilfrid), “Arthur Balfour and the Foundations of Belief,” Edinburgh Review, clxxxii (1895):129–30Google Scholar.

58 Ibid., p. 199, 201.

59 Ward, Wilfrid, “The Foundations of Belief,” in Problems and Persons (London, 1903), p. 183Google Scholar. In the Introduction to the 1902 edition of Foundations, Balfour responded to his critics, especially those who thought he was justifying an excess of credulity by an excess of scepticism, reminding them of “the avowedly tentative character of the scheme of thought” (p. ix.).

60 Ward, Wilfrid, “Reminiscences,” in Ward, Maisie, The Wilfrid Wards and the Transition (London and New York, 1934–1937), I, 305Google Scholar.

61 SAUL, Balfour to Ward, 9 December 1895, WFP, St. Andrews University Library.

62 SAUL, Balfour to Ward, 20 December 1895, WFP.

63 Ward to Balfour, January 1896, in Ward, Maisie, The Wilfrid Wards, I, 354Google Scholar.

64 A nearly complete list of the membership may be found in Balfour, Arthur James, compiler, Papers Presented Before the Synthetic Society, 1896-1908 (London, privately printed, 1909)Google Scholar and in Ward, Maisie, The Wilfrid Wards, IGoogle Scholar, Appendix A.

65 Ward, Maisie, The Wilfrid Wards I, 356Google Scholar.

66 Prestige, George L., The Life of Charles Gore (London, 1935), p. 176Google Scholar.

67 Balfour, , comp., Papers Presented Before the Synthetic Society, p. vGoogle Scholar.

68 These included Balfour, Hutton, Sidgwick, and Martineau.

69 Ward, Maisie, The Wilfrid Wards, I, 356Google Scholar.

70 Ibid., I, p. 368.

71 Chesterton, G.K., Autobiography of G.K. Chesterton (New York, 1936), p. 269Google Scholar.

72 Balfour, , “Heads of Argument,” in Papers Presented Before the Synthetic Society, pp. 20–23Google Scholar.

73 Wilfrid Ward later recalled that the first meeting “was rendered accidentally picturesque by the fact that it was the night of the Speaker's levée. Many members, including Mr. Balfour, Lord Haldane, and Lord Bryce were in Uniform.” Ward, , Last Lectures (London, 1918), p. 244Google Scholar. Of the same meeting, Holland, Henry Scott remarked to a correspondent: “And you ought to have seen Haldane making a speech about Hegel, in a Court suit of black velvet.” Paget, Stephen (ed.), Henry Scott Holland … Memoir and Letters (London, 1921), p. 273Google Scholar.

74 All these papers were printed in Papers Presented Before the Synthetic Society. An average of fifteen members attended each meeting. Attendance figures are based upon an examination of the “Minute Book” of the society (privately held) and the diaries and correspondence of certain members.

75 It is not quite accurate to say, as has Kenneth Young, that there is no available record; Young, , Balfour, p. 161Google Scholar. A considerable quantity of diaries and correspondence has become available since 1963. Of particular importance is the Ward-Balfour correspondence, now deposited at St. Andrews, and the Webb Journals in the Bodleian.

76 The closeness of the Ward-Balfour friendship may be considered unique, especially as Balfour “personally found Roman Catholicism repugnant”; Young, , Balfour, p. 159Google Scholar. Maisie Ward recalled that “My father … was once immensely amused when a close connection of Mr. Balfour expressed her amazement at the friendship between them ‘for you know,’ she said, ‘he does so hate your Church;’” The Wilfrid Wards, I, 373Google Scholar.

77 Webb, Clement C.J., “Arthur James Balfour,” Proceedings of British Academy, xvi (1930), 417–18Google Scholar; also quoted in Young, , Balfour, p. 162Google Scholar.

78 SAUL, Balfour to Ward, 5 March 1896, WFP.

79 Wilfrid, , Last Lectures, p. 244Google Scholar.

80 Balfour, , untitled paper, Papers Presented Before the Synthetic Society, p. 328Google Scholar.

81 Ibid., pp. 331-32.

82 Quoted in Sidgwick, Arthur and Sidgwick, Eleanor, Henry Sidgwick: A Memoir (London and New York, 1906), pp. 556–57Google Scholar.

83 SAUL, Balfour to Ward, 23 October 1900, WFP.

84 Ward, Maisie, The Wilfrid Wards, II, 412Google Scholar.

85 SAUL, Balfour to Ward, 7 December 1904, WFP.

86 SAUL, Balfour to Ward, 2 July 1906, WFP.

87 Balfour presented the bound papers to the membership in September 1909; SAUL, Von Hügel Diary, 11 September 1909.

88 Maurice, Frederick B., Haldane: The Life of Viscount Haldane of Cloan (London, 1937–1939), I, 69Google Scholar.

89 Webb, , “Arthur James Balfour,” Proceedings of the British Academy, XVI:413–14Google Scholar.

90 Maurice, , Haldane, I, 72–73Google Scholar.

91 Ibid., I:100-01.

92 Balfour to Ward, 28 May 1896, WFP.

93 SAUL. Balfour to Ward, 27 April 1902, WFP.

94 SirLodge, Oliver, Past Years (London, 1930), p. 222Google Scholar. Lodge advised Balfour as the latter prepared his presidential address to the British Association in 1904, in which he discussed the then novel views on the electronic constitution of matter in their philosophical aspect. The Fourth Baron Rayleigh, Robert John Strutt, recalled the event: “Foreign savants who attended as guests of the Association were a good deal astonished at the range of scientific knowledge of the speaker, and some of them were disposed for a moment to doubt whether he could really be the Prime Minister, in part because he wore no decorations.” Strutt, , Lord Balfour in Relation to Science (Cambridge, 1930) pp. 26–27Google Scholar.

95 Balfour, Speech before the Scottish Home Missions and Church Extension, Glasgow, 4 November 1901, in Arthur James Balfour as Philosopher and Thinker, Short, Wilfrid (ed.), (London, 1912), p. 501Google Scholar.

96 As reported in the London Times, quoted in ibid., pp. 502-04.

97 Hynes, , The Edwardian Turn of Mind, p. 31Google Scholar. Balfour expressed this view formally in his Sidgwick, Lecture published as Decadence (Cambridge 1908)Google Scholar.

98 Balfour told his niece, Blanche Dugdale, that there were only two men whom he hoped would understand his philosophy, Bergson and Andrew Seth Pringle-Pattison, Dugdale, , Balfour, II, 301Google Scholar.

99 Balfour, , “Bergson's Creative Evolution,” The Hibbert Journal, X (1911)Google Scholar, reprinted in Balfour, , Essays Speculative and Political (London, 1920), pp. 132–33Google Scholar.

100 Oliver Lodge disagreed with much of Balfour's interpretation of Bergson, and a literary debate ensued between the two old friends in the pages of The Hibbert Journal. Bergson privately sided with Lodge, to whom he wrote: II était impossible de mieux pénétre et d'exposer plus clairment ce que j'ai voulu dire.” Archives of the London Society for Psychical Research, Bergson to Lodge, 14 January 1912, Lodge Papers.

101 Balfour to Haldane, 8 December 1911, quoted in Zebel, Sydney H., Balfour: A Political Biography (Cambridge, 1973), p. 176Google Scholar.

102 Young, , Balfour, p. 326Google Scholar. See also, Balfour, , Theism and Humanism (London, 1915), p. viiGoogle Scholar. Robert John Strutt notes of Balfour's first series of Gifford Lectures: “Their success was extraordinary; the audiences amounted to something like two thousand and increased beyond the seating accommodations as the course of ten lectures proceeded.” Strutt, , Lord Balfour, p. 23Google Scholar.

103 Balfour, , Theism and Humanism, p. 21Google Scholar.

104 Dugdale, , Balfour, II: 75–76Google Scholar. Andrew Seth Pringle-Pattison called Balfour's Gifford Lectures “an autobiographical parenthesis”; in Dugdale, , Balfour, IIGoogle Scholar, Appendix I, 308.

105 Balfour, , Theism and Humanism, p. 248Google Scholar.

106 SAUL, Balfour to Von Hügel, 12 February 1914, MS2203, Von Hugel Papers.

107 In Proceedings of the British Academy, 1924-25 (London, 1927), pp. 305–409Google Scholar. An original Fellow of the British Academy, Balfour was its president from 1921 to 1926.

108 Balfour, , “Introduction,” in Science, Religion and Reality, Needham, Joseph (ed.), (London, 1925), pp. 3–18Google Scholar.

109 Asquith, Margot, The Autobiography of Margot Asquith, Carter, Mark Bonham (ed.), (Boston, 1963), p. 115Google Scholar.

110 Quoted in Kenyon, F.G., “Balfour,” Proceedings of the British Academy, XVI (1930): 421Google Scholar.