Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:23:18.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 Comparison of induction agents for rapid sequence intubation in refractory status epilepticus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2023

Matthew Woodward
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Samantha Schleicher
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Jamie Podell
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Wan-Tsu Chang
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Melissa Motta
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Melissa Pergakis
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Gunjan Parikh
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Neeraj Badjatia
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Nicholas Morris
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Multiple induction agents can facilitate rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in management of refractory status epilepticus (rSE), many which have anti-seizure properties. We examine the anti-seizure efficacy and safety of induction agents used during RSI in the management of rSE. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of patients admitted to the neuro-ICU intubated for management of rSE. Propofol, ketamine and benzodiazepines were considered anti-seizure medication (ASMs), etomidate was not. Patients were treated with propofol or midazolam following intubation. Our primary outcome was clinical or electrographic recurrence of SE within 12 hours of intubation. Exploratory outcomes included time to recover command following, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and complications related to intubation. We used multivariable logistical regression to evaluate outcomes between patients induced with ASMs and etomidate. A Fisher exact test was used to compare rSE cessation in a subset of patients with continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) at the time of intubation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified 149 induced for RSI in management of rSE: 88 patients intubated using ASMs (propofol,n=56; ketamine,n=14; benzodiazepines,n=18) and 61 patients intubated with etomidate. Forty-one patients had recurrence (29.9% ASMS, 24.6% etomidate). The induction agent was not associated with recurrence of SE, time to command following, or duration of MV. Twenty-seven patients had cEEG monitoring at the time of intubation. Sixteen of the 22 patients induced with ASMs had cessation of rSE with induction, while 1 of 5 intubated with etomidate had cessation (Fisher exact test, p=0.047). There were 34 patients with post-induction hypotension (22.9% ASMs, 22.9% etomidate (Fisher exact test, p=1)). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Induction with an anti-seizure medication during intubation was more likely to halt rSE, but did not decrease the likelihood of clinical or electrographic recurrence of rSE and may not affect time to recovery of command following or duration of MV.

Type
Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science