Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:22:20.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

342 The Implications of High Expression of VISTA, a Negative Check Point Regulator, on Prognosis Across Malignant Solid Tumors: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2023

Alexander S Martin
Affiliation:
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Yana V Salei
Affiliation:
Tufts Medical Center
Mumtu Lalla
Affiliation:
Tufts Medical Center
Paola Sebastiani
Affiliation:
Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Rebecca A. Morin
Affiliation:
Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University
Robert E Martell
Affiliation:
Tufts Medical Center
Ludovic Trinquart
Affiliation:
Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Targeting the V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) signaling pathway has been suggested as a promising approach for overcoming resistance to current immune checkpoint therapies in advanced cancer. This review will synthesize the rapidly-expanding literature on VISTA protein expression on prognosis in various cancers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To determine the prognostic significance of high VISTA expression across treatment-naïve malignant tumors, a systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed of published cohort studies which measured VISTA protein expression on solid tumors. Primary and secondary outcome endpoints of overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) will be compared across cohort studies using a random effects model to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for each time-to-event end point with 95% CIs. For articles that only provide Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, the Engauge Digitizer software will be used to measure the time and survival probability coordinates on the KM curves to estimate the HRs. Correlations of VISTA expression and clinicopathological characteristics will be evaluated by pooled risk ratios. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A search of 4 electronic databases including Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane resulted in 5578 publications of which 66 containing a broad spectrum of malignant solid tumors will undergo full-text review for study inclusion. Tumor types most represented with at least 3 articles include lung, pancreas, skin, head & neck, colorectal, mesothelioma, cervix, soft tissue, breast, liver and ovarian. Our working hypothesis is that the pooled HR for high VISTA expression on overall survival will be approaching 1.0 given conflicting reports across the cancer literature. Risk of bias will be assessed across studies. Quantifications of heterogeneity will be assessed by visual exploration of forest plots as well as by multiple statistical metrics including the Q statistic and the I²coefficient. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a more comprehensive understanding of VISTA’s prognostic role both across all malignant tumors and for subgroups of similar tumor types which may impact the types of tumors and tumor microenvironments selected for early trials of anti-VISTA therapy.

Type
Precision Medicine/Health
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science