Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:50:36.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4278 Recovery Time is Exaggerated in Individuals with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Following Standing Lateral Waist Pulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2020

Timothy Boerger
Affiliation:
Marquette University
Learon McGinn
Affiliation:
Marquette University
Marisa Clare
Affiliation:
Marquette University
Marjorie Wang
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
Brian D Schmit
Affiliation:
Marquette University
Allison S Hyngstrom
Affiliation:
Marquette University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The aim of this study was to quantify balance impairments in stance in individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy (IwDCM) in response to external perturbations. IwDCM have damage to their spinal cord due to degeneration of the cervical vertebral column, but little is known about balance. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Recovery time following a perturbation may be an important measure of balance. Changes in recovery time were measured in 7 IwDCM (2m, 58.59±15.00y) and 6 controls without DCM (2m, 56.91±11.04y) as they stood on an instrumented treadmill and received cued (predictable) and uncued (unpredictable) lateral pulls to the waist at 12% (high) and 6% (low) pull magnitudes. Individuals stood with feet together, shoulder width, and wide. Recovery time was defined as the time following pull onset when the absolute value of the center of pressure velocity returned to <1x baseline standard deviation. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed on recovery time. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that feet together standing, unpredictable, higher magnitude perturbations will be most challenging evidenced by longer recovery times. For waist pull recovery time, there was a trend for a Group x Predictability x Magnitude x Stance Width interaction (p = 0.1) which we anticipate being greater with additional participants. There were significant Group x Predictability x Stance Width (p = 0.01) and Group x Magnitude x Predictability (p = 0.01) interactions. IwDCM had exaggerated recovery times in narrow and wide stances with unpredictable pulls. IwDCM recovered more slowly in response to unpredictable higher magnitude pulls. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Balance responses in IwDCM are most impaired in narrow stances and when perturbations are unpredictable. Rehabilitation should focus on shortening latency of response timing and increasing power utilization during balance response to promote quicker recovery.

Type
Mechanistic Basic to Clinical
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020