Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T20:21:18.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

511. Observations on the serological typing of group N (‘lactic’) streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. A. E. Briggs  and
L. G. M. Newland
C. A. E. Briggs
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
L. G. M. Newland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Agglutinating type sera were prepared in rabbits for fourteen representative strains in a collection of sixty-eight group N (‘lactic’) streptococci.

2. Common type antigens, distinct for each named species, were found in strains of Str. lactis (inhibitory varieties), Str. diacetilactis and Str. cremoris.

3. Certain individuals in each of the named ‘groups’ contained additional heterologous antigens, some of which were identical to heterologous (but not the common) antigens in strains of other groups.

4. Quantitative differences in the representation of common antigens were also found.

5. Str. lactis OJ and Str. cremoris HP were shown to be mirror images of each other so far as their type antigens are concerned, containing two common type antigens in inverse proportions of 4:1 respectively. Str. lactis OJ possesses the ‘cremoris group’ type antigen, and the implications of this observation are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1953 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Mattick, A. T. R. & Shattock, P. M. F. (1943). Nature, Land., 151, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Shattock, P. M. F. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1943). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Swartling, P. F. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Briggs, C. A. E. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Briggs, C. A. E. & Newland, L. G. M. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Berridge, N. J. (1949). Biochem. J. 45, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hirsch, A. (1946). Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. 1, 26.Google Scholar
8Hirsch, A. (1950). J. gen. Microbiol. 4, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Hirsch, A. (1951). J. gen. Microbiol. 5, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hirsch, A., Grinsted, E., Chapman, H. R. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Mattick, A. T. R. & Hirsch, A. (1944). Nature, Lond., 154, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Mattick, A. T. R. & Hirsch, A. (1947). Lancet, 253, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hirsch, A. & Grinsted, E. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. Dairy., Reading (1950), p. 46.Google Scholar
15Niven, C. F., Smiley, K. L. & Sherman, J. M. (1942). J. Bact. 43, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Lancefield, R. C. (1933). J. exp. Med. 57, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Colebrook, D. C. (1935). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Land., no. 205.Google Scholar
18Mickle, H. (1948). J. Roy. micr. Soc. 68, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Shattock, P. M. F. (1949). J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Sharpe, M. E. (1952). J. gen. Microbiol. 7, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Lancefield, R. C. (1928). J. exp. Med. 47, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Nichols, A. A. & Hoyle, M. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Dawson, M. H., Hobby, G. L. & Olmstead, M. (1938). J. infect. Dis. 62, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Hirsch, A. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Hirsch, A. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar