Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:53:39.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CPG-chromatography studies on the stability of casein micelles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Märtha Larsson-Raźnikiewicz ,
Elisabeth Almlöf  and
Bo Ekstrand
Märtha Larsson-Raźnikiewicz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Elisabeth Almlöf
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Bo Ekstrand
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Casein micelles fractionated on controlled pore glass (CPG-10/3000) were shown to be stable by recycling experiments. Only minor effects on the size distribution of the casein micelles were found after heating skim-milk to 100 °C for 10 min, or freeze-drying skim-milk at – 70 °C followed by resuspension in the synthetic milk serum of Jenness & Koops (1962). The heating caused some whey proteins (β-lactoglobulin) to enter the micelle fractions while the freeze-drying caused some of the largest micelles to disrupt. In colloidal calcium phosphate-free skim-milk prepared according to Pyne & McGann (1960) all the micelles appeared to dissociate into monomeric caseins.

Type
Section D. Casein Micelles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Symposium on the Physics and Chemistry of Milk Proteins , April 1979 , pp. 313 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almlöf, E., Larsson-Ra źnikiewicz, M., Lindqvist, I. & Munyija, J. (1977). Preparative Biocliemistry 7, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstrand, B. & Larsson-Raźnikiewicz, M. (1978). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 356, 1.Google Scholar
Holt, C., Daloleish, D. G. & Pabker, T. G. (1973). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 328, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. & Koops, J. (1962). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 16, 153.Google Scholar
McGann, T. C. A. & Pyne, G. T. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyne, G. T. & McGann, T. C. A. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. & Nakamichi, M. (1962). Analytical Biochemistry 3, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. (1971). In Milk Proteins, Chemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. II, p. 3. (Ed. McKenzie., H.) New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar