Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:21:03.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New infection rate of bovine mammary glands after application of an internal teat seal at dry-off

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2013

Volker Krömker ,
Nils Th. Grabowski  and
Julia Friedrich
Volker Krömker*
Affiliation:
Faculty II, Department of Microbiology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover, Heisterbergallee 12, 30453 Hannover, Germany
Nils Th. Grabowski
Affiliation:
Institute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany
Julia Friedrich
Affiliation:
Faculty II, Department of Microbiology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover, Heisterbergallee 12, 30453 Hannover, Germany
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: volker.kroemker@hs-hannover.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The internal teat sealant OrbeSeal® (Zoetis, Berlin, Germany) is intended to prevent new intramammary infection (IMI) throughout the dry period. The aim of this field study was to determine new infection rates in udder quarters applied exclusively with the sealant at dry-off and untreated ones (control group). For that, the new infection rate of udder quarters treated with the sealant was evaluated in a split-udder design (front right and rear left udder quarters treated, the other ones untreated) in 128 cows from nine dairy farms in North Germany that were healthy in all four udder quarters (i.e. <100 000 cells/ml, bacteriologically negative). After calving, duplicate quarter milk samples were collected twice at DIM (days in milk) 5–12 and 7 d later for culture. The new infection rates for treated and untreated groups were 3·4 and 10·5%, respectively. The results showed that applying a standardised study design with very few confounders under field conditions, using internal teat sealants reduced the new infection rate on quarter level to a third of that of the control group. Thus, internal teat sealants represent a viable option for dry-off treatment of udder-healthy cows.

Keywords

Teat sealantmastitisnew infection ratedry period
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 54 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, EA 2000 Dry cow strategies and results from a selective dry cow trial. Cattle Practice 8 255–258 Google Scholar
Berry, EA & Hillerton, JE 2002 The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2512–2520 Google Scholar
Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2001 An investigation of the impact of intramammary antibiotic dry cow therapy on clinical coliform mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 84 1632–1639 Google Scholar
German Veterinary Association (GVA) 2009 Leitlinien zur Entnahme von Milchproben unter antiseptischen Bedingungen und Isolierung und Identifizierung von Mastitiserregern [Guidelines for Aseptic Milk Sampling and Guidelines to Isolate and Identify Mastitis Pathogens]. 1st edition. Gießen, Germany: German Veterinary Association Google Scholar
Grabowski, NT, Ahlfeld, B & Klein, G 2012 Udder health from the point of view of a diagnosis laboratory. Journal of Food Quality and Food Safety 63 86–91 Google Scholar
Halasa, T, Østerås, O, Hogeveen, H, van Werven, T & Nielen, M 2009 Meta-analysis of dry cow management for dairy cattle, part 1: protection against new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 92 3134–3149 Google Scholar
Huxley, JN, Green, MJ, Green, LE & Bradley, AJ 2002 Evaluation of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer during the dry period. Journal of Dairy Science 85 551–561 Google Scholar
Krömker, V 2012 Strategies against mastitis due to cow-associated pathogens as a herd problem. Journal of Food Quality and Food Safety 63 61–64 Google Scholar
Krömker, V, Pfannenschmidt, F & Friedrich, J 2010 Neuinfektionsrate der Milchdrüsen von Milchkühen in der Trockenperiode nach Anwendung eines internen Zitzenversieglers zum Trockenstellen [New infection rate of bovine mammary glands after application of an internal teat seal at dry off]. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 123 215–225 Google Scholar
Krömker, V, Friedrich, J, Kleen, JL, Klocke, D, Paduch, JH, Zinke, C, Haverkamp, H, Taffe, B, Koch, A, Reinecke, F & Volling, O 2011 Mastitis control on herd level. Der Praktische Tierarzt 92 4–35 Google Scholar
Lam, TJ, DeJong, MC, Schukken, YH & Brand, A 1996 Mathematical modeling to estimate efficacy of postmilking teat disinfection in split-udder trials of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79 62–70 Google Scholar
Meaney, WJ 1977 Effect of a dry period teat seal on bovine udder infection. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 16 293–299 Google Scholar
National Mastitis Council 1999 Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. 360 Revised edition. Madison, WI, USA: National Mastitis Council Inc Google Scholar
Petrovski, KR, Caicedo-Caldas, A, Williamson, NB, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Grinberg, A, Parkinson, TJ, Tucker, IG 2011 Efficacy of a novel internal dry period teat sealant containing 0·5% chlorhexidine against experimental challenge with Streptococcus uberis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 94 3366–3375 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pieper, J, Hoedemaker, M, Krömker, V 2013 Significance of the dry period for the development and prevention of new infections of the bovine mammary gland. Tierärztl Prax 41 (G) 1–9 Google Scholar
Redetzky, R & Hamann, J 2003 Possibilities and limitations of teat sealers for prevention of mastitis. Der Praktische Tierarzt 84 530–538 Google Scholar
Suriyasathaporn, W, Heuer, C, Nordhuizen-Stassen, EN & Schukken, YH 2000 Hyperketonaemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. Veterinary Research 31 397–412 Google Scholar
Tenhagen, BA, Köster, G, Wallmann, J & Heuwieser, W 2006 Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2542–2551 Google Scholar
Woolford, MW, Williamson, JH, Day, AM & Copeman, PJA 1998 The prophylactic effect of a teat sealer on bovine mastitis during the dry period and the following lactation. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 46 12–19 Google Scholar