Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:44:21.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trials of a novel mastitis sensor on experimentally infected cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

John R. Lake ,
J. Eric Hillerton ,
Barry Ambler  and
Helen C. Wheeler
John R. Lake
Affiliation:
AFRC Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS, UK
J. Eric Hillerton*
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN, UK
Barry Ambler
Affiliation:
AFRC Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS, UK
Helen C. Wheeler
Affiliation:
AFRC Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS, UK
*
† For correspondance.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Numerous attempts to develop in-line Systems for the measurement of the electrical conductivity of milk as an aid to the detection of mastitis have been described. The major technical problem of fouling of electrodes exposed to milk has been overcome in the sensor tested here by use of an inductive System of measurement. The practical application of this System in the milking parlour is reported. The novel mastitis sensor has been shown to detect incipient mastitis before there are visible signs of abnormal milk. Conductivity measurements have the advantage over other diagnostic procedures in that the information is available immediately without additional effort. Normalized conductivity and milk yield variation results indicate the potential for developing a practical, automatic System for mastitis detection.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 11 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler, M. C., Allen, G. J. & Hillerton, J. E. 1990 Methods of measuring and calculating milking performance of cows. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 46 245–257Google Scholar
Grindal, R. J. & Griffin, T. K. 1989 Effect of hydraulic milking on milking performance, teat condition and lipolysis. Journal of Dairy Research 56 45–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillerton, J. E. & Walton, A. W. 1991 Identification of sub-clinical mastitis with a hand-held electrical conductivity meter. Veterinary Record 128 513–515Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1979 Somatic cells in milk: their significance and recommended methods for coiniting. International Dairy Federation Bulletin No. 114Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1981 Laboratory methods for use in mastitis Work. International Dairy Federation Bulletin No. 132Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. & Peaker, M. 1975 Efficacy of the measurement of the electrical conductivity of milk for the detection of subclinical mastitis in cows: detection of infected cows at a single visit. British Veterinary Journal 131 447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onyango, C. M., Marchant, J. A., Lake, J. R. & Stanbridge, D. A. 1988 A low maintenance conductivity sensor for detecting mastitis. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 40 215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peaker, M. 1978 The electrical conductivity of milk for the detection of subclinical mastitis in cows: comparison of various methods of handling conductivity data with the use of cell counts and bacteriological examination. Brilish Veterinary Journal 134 308–314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentice, J. H. 1972 The temperature coefficient of electrolytic conductivity of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 39 275–278Google Scholar
Sheldrake, R. F., McGreoor, G. D. & Hoare, R. J. T. 1983 Somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, and serum albumin concentration for detecting bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 66 548–555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed