Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:10:23.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF STATE REPRESSION ON POLITICAL BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES: EVIDENCE FROM TAIWAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Abstract

This article examines how violence against citizens affects their political attitudes and behavior in the long run, and how those effects vary over time. We construct and analyze a novel dataset on the victims of Taiwan's February 28 Incident, in 1947, with survey data spanning 1990 to 2017. Our empirical analysis shows that cohorts having directly or indirectly experienced the Incident are less likely to support the Kuomintang Party (KMT), the former authoritarian ruling party responsible for the Incident. They tend to disagree with the key conventional policy stand of the KMT (unification with mainland China), are more likely to self-identify as Taiwanese, and are less likely to vote for KMT presidential candidates. Taiwan's residents who were born in towns with larger number of casualties during the Incident are more likely to reject unification. Finally, the effects are found to vary over the period following democratization.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balcells, Laia. 2012. “The Consequences of Victimization on Political Identities.” Politics & Society 40 (3): 311347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M., and Jackman, Simon. 2014. “A Generational Model of Political Learning.” Electoral Studies 33: 718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, G. Andy, and Wang, T. Y.. 2005. “Taiwanese or Chinese? Independence or Unification?: An Analysis of Generational Differences in Taiwan.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 40 (1–2): 2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnysh, Volha, and Finkel, Evgeny. 2017. The Death Camp Eldorado: Political and Economic Effects of Mass Violence. American Political Science Review 111 (4): 801818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Tsui-Lien. 2008. “Li shih jheng yi de kun jing—zu cyun yi ti yu er er ba lun shu” [The predicament of historical justice: Ethnic issues and the discourses on the 228 uprising]. Guo shih guan syue shu ji kan [Academia Historica] 16: 179222.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2004. “The Promise of Democratic Pacification: An Empirical Assessment.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (3): 539560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. A. 1996. “Constitutional Promises” and Repressive Reality: A Cross-National Time-Series Investigation of Why Political and Civil Liberties are Suppressed.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 627654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmer, Lowell. 2004. “Taiwan and the Issue of National Identity. Asian Survey 44 (4): 475483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durdin, Tillman. 1947a. “Formosa Killings are Put at 10,000.” New York Times, March 29. www.nytimes.com/1947/03/29/archives/formosa-killings-are-put-at-10000-foreigners-say-the-chinese.html.Google Scholar
Durdin, Tillman. 1947b. “Formosans Slaughtered, Thousands Imprisoned as Chinese Quell Riots.” The Globe and Mail, March 31.Google Scholar
Durdin, Tillman. 1947c. “Nanking Censures Formosa Governor.” New York Times, March 23. www.nytimes.com/1947/03/23/archives/nanking-censures-formosa-governor-party-committee-approves-a.html.Google Scholar
Earl, Jennifer. 2011. “Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control.” Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 261284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischauer, Stefan. 2007. “The 228 Incident and the Taiwan Independence Movement's Construction of a Taiwanese Identity.” China Information 21 (3): 373401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Norval D. 1976. Cohort Analysts’ Futile Quest: Statistical Attempts to Separate Age, Period and Cohort Effects. American Sociological Review 41 (5): 900904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosfeld, Irena, Rodnyansky, Alexander, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. 2013. “Persistent Antimarket Culture: A Legacy of the Pale of Settlement after the Holocaust.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5 (3): 189226.Google Scholar
Harff, Barbara. 2003. “No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder Since 1955.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 5773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Karl, Weng, Dennis Lu-chung, and Clarke, Harold D.. 2015. “Using Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys to Study Political Attitudes and Behavior in a New Democracy: HAPC Models for Taiwan.” Electoral Studies 39: 256263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Ji Yeon, and Kang, Woo Chang. 2017. “Trauma and Stigma: The Long-Term Effects of Wartime Violence on Political Attitudes.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (3): 264286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Chris. 2017. “Taiwan Commemorates a Violent Nationalist Episode, 70 Years Later.” New York Times, February 26. www.nytimes.com/2017/02/26/world/asia/taiwan-1947-kuomintang.html.Google Scholar
Hou, Kun-hung. 2011. Yan jiou er er ba [Studying the 228 Incident]. Taipei: Boyang Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng. 2004. “National Identity and Taiwan's Mainland China Policy.” Journal of Contemporary China 13 (40): 479490.Google Scholar
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng. 2005. “Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 40 (1–2): 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, and Niou, Emerson M. S. (1996). “Salient Issues in Taiwan's Electoral Politics.” Electoral Studies 15 (2): 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chi. 2019. “Generation Effects? Evolution of Independence–Unification Views in Taiwan, 1996–2016.” Electoral Studies 58: 103112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krain, Matthew. 1997. “State-Sponsored Mass Murder.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (3): 331360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Tse-han, Myers, Ramon Hawley, and Wei, Wou. 1991. A Tragic Beginning: The Taiwan Uprising of February 28, 1947. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Da-Chi, Chen, Boyu, and Huang, Chi-chen. 2013. “The Decline of “Chinese Identity” in Taiwan?!—An Analysis of Survey Data from 1992 to 2012.” East Asia 30 (4): 273290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Tse-Min, Chu, Yun-Han, and Hinich, Melvin J. (1996). “Conflict Displacement and Regime Transition in Taiwan: A Spatial Analysis.” World Politics 48 (4): 453481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Peisakhin, Leonid. 2017. “The Legacy of Political Violence Across Generations.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 836851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neundorf, Anja, Gerschewski, Johannes, and Olar, Roman-Gabriel. 2020. “How Do Inclusionary and Exclusionary Autocracies Affect Ordinary People?” Comparative Political Studies 53 (12): 18901925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Steven. 1999. “Between Assimilation and Independence: Taiwanese Aspirations Under Nationalist Chinese Rule, 1945–1948.” In Taiwan: A New History, ed. Rubinstein, Murray A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rozenas, Arturas, Schutte, Sebastian, and Zhukov, Yuri. 2017. “The Political Legacy of Violence: The Long-Term Impact of Stalin's Repression in Ukraine.” Journal of Politics 79 (4): 11471161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenas, Arturas, and Zhukov, Yuri M.. 2019. “Mass Repression and Political Loyalty: Evidence From Stalin's ‘Terror by Hunger.’ American Political Science Review 113 (2): 569583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Gunter. 2004. “Taiwan's Political Parties and National Identity: The Rise of an Overarching Consensus.” Asian Survey 44 (4): 534554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Cheng-feng, and Chen, Mumin. 2010. “Taiwanese Identity and the Memories of 2-28: A Case for Political Reconciliation.” Asian Perspective 34 (4): 85113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, Kaat, and Neundorf, Anja. 2014. “The Hierarchies of Age-Period-Cohort Research: Political Context and the Development of Generational Turnout Patterns.” Electoral Studies 33: 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stead, Ronald. (1946). “Taiwanese Decry “Inefficiency” Under Chinese Administration.” The Christian Science Monitor, September 11: 11.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A. 2014. “Why We Kill: The Political Science of Political Violence Against Civilians.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 89103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A., Huth, Paul, and Balch-Lindsay, Dylan. 2004. “‘Draining the Sea’: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare.” International Organization 58 (2): 375407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yuhua. 2021. “The Political Legacy of Violence During China's Cultural Revolution.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 463487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Nai-Teh. 2008. “Shu sie ‘min zu’ chuang shang: er er ba shih jian di li shih ji yi” [Writing on a “national” trauma: historical memory of the incident of 28 February 1947]. Sih siang yue kan [Reflection] 8 (1): 3970.Google Scholar
Yang, Yang, and Land, Kenneth C.. 2006. “A Mixed Models Approach to the Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-Section Surveys, With an Application to Data on Trends in Verbal Test Scores.” Sociological Methodology 36 (1): 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Zongxian. and Jinli, Wang. 2009. “Tai wan ren kou bian dong yu jing ji fa jhan” [Population Change and Economic Development in Taiwan]. Taipei: Lianjing Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chiou and Hong supplementary material

Appendix

Download Chiou and Hong supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 355.3 KB