Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:29:43.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UTILITY AND CONDITIONS OF DIFFUSION BY DIASPORAS: EXAMINING FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT LIBERALIZATION IN CHINA AND INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2016

Min Ye
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diffusion studies have rightly emphasized external ideas and resources that propel liberalization in the developing world. There remain two gaps: first, the literature has not covered the types of diffusers and the ways diasporas may shape liberalization in their homelands; second, it pays little attention to internal diffusion after national adoption within a country. This article explores the utility and conditions of diffusion by diasporas and examines the roles of diasporas and internal diffusion in China and India's FDI liberalization. In both countries, diasporas were main diffusers that led national adoption of liberalism at home. In China, however, entrepreneurial diasporas' networks with local governments helped expansive internal diffusion. India's professional diasporas did not strongly engage local governments or domestic companies. National adoption in India was followed by reversal and partial internal diffusions. India's software services provide a similar diffusion by diasporas to that in China.

Keywords

diffusion by diasporaspolicy networksChinaIndiaForeign Direct Investment
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , July 2016 , pp. 261 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bajpai, Shankar. 1992. “India in 1991: New Beginnings.” Asian Survey 32 (2): 207–216.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 1999. Political Economy of Development in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1993. India in Transition: Freeing the Economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Thomas. 1985. “Financing Shenzhen's Economic Development: A Preliminary Analysis of Sources of Capital Construction Investments, 1979–1984.” Asian Journal of Public Administration 7 (2): 170–197.Google Scholar
Debroy, Bibek, Bhandari, Laveesh, and Anklesaria, Swaminathan. 2011. Economic Freedom of the States of India: 2011. CATO Institute Publications. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
Elkin, Zackary, Guzman, Andrew, and Simmons, Beth. 2006. “Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000.” International Organization 60 (4): 811–46.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary. 2005. Contagious Capitalism: Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian and Ward, Michael. 2008. “Diffusion and the Spread of Democratic Institutions.” In The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, edited by Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, Garrett, Geoffrey. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guowuyuan qiaowu bangongshi. 2001. Deng Xiaoping lun qiaowu [Deng Xiaoping on Overseas Chinese Affairs]. Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
He, Yunhua. 2004. “1984 nian Deng Xiaoping shicha Shenzhen qianhou” [Before and After Deng Xiaoping's 1984 Inspection of Shenzhen]. Yanhuang chunqiu 3: 10–16.Google Scholar
Huang, Yasheng. 2003. Selling China: Foreign Direct Investment during the Reform Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ju, Tianxiang. 1998. “Gu Mu yu Yuan Geng: Chuangjian Shekou gongyequ de muhou taiqianren” [The People Behind the Scene: Gu Mu and Yuan Geng and the Establishment of the Shekou Industrial Zone]. Yanhuang chunqiu 10: 27–31.Google Scholar
Kapur, Devesh. 2010. Diaspora, Development, and Democracy: The Domestic Impact of International Migration from India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Khanna, Tarun, Palepu, Krishna, and Bullock, Richard. 2009. “House of Tata: Acquiring a Global Footprint.” Harvard Business School, Case 9–708–446, June 30.Google Scholar
Kochanek, Stanley. 1995. “The Transformation of Interest Politics in India.” Pacific Affairs 68 (4): 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1989. “Politics of Economic Liberalization in India.” World Development 17 (3): 305–328.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2012. Poverty Amid Plenty in the New India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David. 2000. “British and American Hegemony Compared: Lessons for the Current Era of Decline.” In International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, edited by Frieden, Jeffrey and Lake, David. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Lardy, Nicholas. 1992. Foreign Trade and Economic Reform in China: 1978–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chang Kil, and Strang, David. 2008. “The International Diffusion of Public Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning.” In The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, edited by Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, Garrett, Geoffrey. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Lanqing. 2008. Tuwei: Guomenchukai de suiyue [Breakthrough: Opening the Doors in the Early Years]. Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lu, Di. 2000. “Gaige kaifang fengyunrenwu Yuan Geng [Reform's Legendary Figure: Yuan Geng].” Yanhuang chunqiu 8: 40–45.Google Scholar
Martinez-Jerez, Asis, Kaplan, Robert, and Miller, Katherine. 2009. “Infosys's Relationship Scorecard: Measuring Transformational Partnerships,” Harvard Business School, Case 9–109–006, December 8.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Stephen. 2014. “Playing Favorites: How Shared Beliefs Shape the IMF's Lending Decisions.” International Organization 68 (2): 297–328.Google Scholar
Panagariya, Arvind. 2008. India: The Emerging Giant. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Margaret. 1991. Joint Ventures in the People's Republic of China: The Control of Foreign Direct Investment under Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis, and Toyoda, Maria. 2008. “Global Ideology and Voter Sentiment as Determinants of International Financial Liberalization.” In The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, edited by Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, Garrett, Geoffrey. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Ramashray. 1994. “India in 1993: The Struggles of Economic Reform.” Asian Survey 34 (2): 200–208.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd, and Rudolph, Susanne. 2001. “Iconisation of Chandrababu: Sharing Sovereignty in India's Federal Market Economy.” Economic and Political Weekly 36 (18): 1541–1552.Google Scholar
Saxenian, Anna-Lee. 2005. “From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China.” Studies in Comparative International Development 40 (2): 35–61.Google Scholar
Shastri, Varnita. 1997. “The Politics of Economic Liberalization in India.” Contemporary South Asia 6 (1): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirk, Susan. 1994. How China Opened its Door: The Political Success of the PRC's Foreign Trade and Investment Reforms. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.” International Organization 60 (4): 781–810.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, Garrett, Geoffrey. eds. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, Aseema. 2005. “Political Foundations of Market-Enhancing Federalism: Theoretical Lessons from India and China.” Comparative Politics 37 (3): 337–356.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 2012. “Of Dominoes and Firewalls: The Domestic, Regional, and Global Politics of International Diffusion.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (4): 631–644.Google Scholar
Swank, David. 2006. “Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism.” International Organization 60 (4): 847–882.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. 2006. World Investment Report, 2006. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Publications.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. 2012. World Investment Report, 2012. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Publications.Google Scholar
Venkitaramanan, S. 2003. “The Prodigals Return,” The Telegraph, February 3. www.telegraphindia.com/1030203/asp/opinion/story_1605454.asp, accessed August 5, 2005.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1998–1999. “The Coming Fight over Capital Flows.” Foreign Policy 113: 41–54.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 2002. Delivering on Debt Relief: From IMF Gold to a New Aid Architecture. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 2006. The Globalizers: The IMF, World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1996. India: Five Years of Stabilization and Reform and the Challenges Ahead. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Xiang, Biao. 2007. Global “Body Shopping”: An Indian Labor System in the International Information Technology Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ye, Min. 2009. “Policy Learning or Diffusion: How China Opened to Foreign Direct Investment?” Journal of East Asian Studies 9 (3): 339–432.Google Scholar
Ye, Min. 2014. Diasporas and Foreign Direct Investment in China and India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhonggong dangshi yanjiushi. 2005. Deng Xiaoping yu gaige kaifang [Deng Xoaping and Reform and Opening], Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhonggong zhongyang wenxian yanjiushi, ed. 2004. Deng Xiaoping nianpu, 1975–1997 [Deng Xiaoping Chronology, 1975 –1997]. Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhongguo gang'ao bangongshi. 1993. Shijie huaren nianjian [Yearbook on Overseas Chinese]. Beijing: Zhongguo gang'ao bangongshi chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhongguo gang'ao bangongshi. 2003. Deng xiaoping lun qiaowu [Deng Xiaoping on Overseas Chinese Affairs]. Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zweig, David. 2002. Internationalizing China: Domestic Interests and Global Linkages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar