Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:33:57.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

History and Doctrine: Heresy and Schism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

B. Drewery
Affiliation:
Bishop Fraser Senior Lecturer in Ecclesiastical History, University of Manchester

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 252 note 1 Hamack to Holl, 1895: K. Holl, Briefwechsel mit A. von Hamack, ed. Kampp 1966, 14 (quoted by E. G. Rupp, Hort and the Cambridge Tradition, Cambridge 1970).

page 252 note 2 Barth, K. D. I/i, 3.

page 252 note 3 E. Schwartz Ges. Schriften, i, Berlin, 1963, 292.

page 252 note 4 Pelagius: Inquiries and Reappraisals, London, 1968, 70Google Scholar.

page 252 note 5 J.T.S., April 1968, 93 ff.

page 253 note 1 Ibid., 112 ff.

page 253 note 2 The Faith of a Moralist, ii. London, 1937, 228, n. 2.

page 254 note 1 Scullard, op. cit., 41, p. 2, line 1: Ine west, Rom th's ally (In the west, Rome's ally); 345, line n : vest (west); 409, n. 16, line 1: Asconsius (Asconius); 437, n. 25, line 3: defied (deified); 467, line 3: Lietzman (Lietzmann). Scullard speaks of a Jewish group called the ‘Hypsistarioi’ (375). This is probably an anachronism; they are not documented until the Cappadocian Fathers. In the Bibliography there is no reference to Barrett, C. K., The New Testament Background: Selected Documents, London, 1957Google Scholar, which i s most relevant for the final chapters of the book.

page 255 note 1 Cf. 59, 86 and especially 77, where the series ‘surely’, ‘it appears’, ‘perhaps’ develops easily into a ‘no doubt'.

page 256 note 1 Only rarely is Dr. Frend ambiguous: e.g. 3, line 3—were ‘they’ the Catholics or the Donatists?

page 256 note 2 J.T.S., April 1968, esp. 111 ff.

page 261 note 1 The Idea of Perfection in Christian Theology, Oxford 1934, 117.

page 261 note 2 Church Quarterly, October 1969, 112.

page 262 note 1 Corrections and references: 28, n. 2 Shürer (Schiirer), n. 3 Eisfeldt (Eissfeldt); 38, n. 27 Letter of Aristeas (no ref. to Meecham); 57, n. 68 date of Christmas (no ref. to Cullmann The Early Church, London, 1956, 21Google Scholar ff.); 58 (Vespasian's remark was surely ironical); 62 tritos apo apostolon (no ref. to Bévenot—see J.T.S., 1966, 98 ff.); 72, n. on the various recensions of Ignatius (no ref. to Lightfoot!); 112, n. 67 (implies wrongly that translations of the Diatessaron are extant); 118 ad Diognetum (no ref. to Meecham); 126, nn. 6 and 8 Horn. (Ps. Clem. Horn.); c. vi (no ref. to John Lawson and his thesis on the ‘Biblical Theology’ of Irenaeus); 179 Tertullian's paradox (no ref. to Bernard Williams in Flew and Maclntyre New Essays in Philosophical Theology, London, 187 ff.); 187, n. 34 Tertullian's work in Christology leaves no trace in other Latin theologians (but cf. 275, and also the further quotation p. 187, which is Leo's Tome all over!); 189, n. 44 (no ref. to A. Schneider's edition of Ad Nationes I, Rome, 1968, which proves Min. Felix to be later than Tert.) ; 194 s.f. Septimus (Septimius); 216 Origen's De Princ. (no mentio n of Butterworth); 223 n. 87 μooυδιos (breathing); 240 s.f. Ireaneus; 300 n. 2 sogenante (sogennante); 309, n. 29 exits (exist); 313, 1.7 αγνετos (αγννητos); 315 init. hypostases (hypostaseis); 331 middle (twice) homousios (homoousios); 369, n. 1 suppositat (?); 375 porsopon (prosopon).

page 264 note 1 Theology, January 1970, 1 ff.

page 264 note 2 The odd slip (e.g. E. L. Greenslade, 9) is rare enough; and in England we refer to ‘Holmes Dudden’ rather than ‘Dudden’ (95 etc.).