Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:21:55.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Check Tax: Fiscal Folly and the Great Monetary Contraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

William D. Lastrapes  and
Grorge Selgin
William D. Lastrapes
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Grorge Selgin
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although its role has been overlooked by monetary historians, a two-cent tax on bank checks effective from June 1932 through December 1934 appears to have been an important contributing factor to that period's severe monetary contraction. According to the estimates in this article, the currency–demand deposit ratio was about 15 percent higher, and the M1 money stock about 12 percent smaller, ceteris paribus, than each would have been without the tax. The contractionary consequences had in fact been anticipated by many legislators who were, nevertheless, unable to prevent the measure from being included in the Revenue Act of 1932.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 859 - 878
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ABA Journal, various dates.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benjamin. Economics and the Public Welfare: A Financial and Economic History of the United States, 1914–1946. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Annual Report, 1932.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benjamin. Federal Reserve Bulletin, various dates.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benjamin. Industrial Production, Washington, DC: GPO, 1986.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D., Choudhri, Ehsan U., and Schwartz, Anna J.. “Could Stable Money have Averted the Great Contraction?” Economic Inquiry 33, no. 3 (1995): 484–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughton, James M., and Wicker, Elmus R.. “The Behavior of the Currency-Deposit Ratio during the Great Depression”. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 11, no. 4 (1979): 405–18.Google Scholar
Brown, E. Cary. “Fiscal Policy in the 'Thirties: A Reappraisal”. American Economic Review 46, no.5 (1956): 857–79.Google Scholar
Burns, Arthur F. “The Relative Importance of Check and Cash Payments in the United States, 1919–1928”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 24, no. 12 (1929): 420–24.Google Scholar
Cagan, Phillip. Determinants and Effects of Changes in the Stock of Money 1875–1960. New York: NBER and Columbia University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Cecchetti, Stephen G. “Prices During the Great Depression: Was the Deflation of 1930–1932 Really Unanticipated?” American Economic Review 82, no. 1 (1992): 141–56.Google Scholar
Cecchetti, Stephen G., and Karras, Georgios. “Sources of Output Fluctuations During the Interwar Period: Further Evidence on the Causes of the Great Depression”. Review of Economics and Statistics 76, no. 1 (1994): 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Record, 72nd Congress, 1st Session.Google Scholar
Dickey, David, and Fuller, Wayne A.. “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”. Econometrica 49, no. 4 (1981): 1057–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Jacobsen Schwartz, Anna. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press and NBER, 1963.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D. “Monetary Factors in the Great Depression”. Journal of Monetary Economics 19, no. 2 (1987): 145–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, Soren, and Juselius, Katarina. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration—With Applications to the Demand for Money”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, no. 2 (1990): 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwiatkowski, Denis Peter C. B. Phillips, Schmidt, Peter, and Shin, Youngcheol. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root”. Journal of Econometrics 54, no. 1 (1992): 159–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, Mark H.The Limits of Symbolic Reform: The New Deal and Taxation, 1933–1939.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Literary Digest, 27 08 1932.Google Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. “Could a Monetary Base Rule Have Prevented the Great Depression?” Journal of Monetary Economics 26, no. 1 (1990): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miron, Jeffrey A., and Romer, Christina D.. “A New Monthly Index of Industrial Production, 1884–1940”. this JOURNAL 50, no. 2 (1990): 321–37.Google Scholar
Monthly Labor Review, 09 1932.Google Scholar
New York Times, various dates.Google Scholar
Perron, Pierre. “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8, no. 2 (1990): 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, Robert A.Consumers' Prices, 1914–1948. New York: National Industrial Conference Board, 1948.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives. Hearings of the Committee on Ways and Means on the Revenue Act of 1932, 72nd Congress, 1st Session, 1932.Google Scholar
U.S. Internal Revenue Commission, Annual Report, various dates.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate. Hearings of the Committee on Finance on the Revenue Act of 1932, 72nd Congress, 1st Session, 1932.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate. Report No. 665, 72nd Congress, 1st Session (Revenue Act of 1932), 1932.Google Scholar
U. S. Treasury. Annual Report, 1931.Google Scholar