Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:46:42.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Opportunity or Hardship? The Causes of Geographic Mobility on the Agricultural Frontier, 1860–1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

James I. Stewart*
Affiliation:
Associate, The Cadmus Group, Energy Services Division, 720 SW Washington St., Suite 400, Portland, OR 97205. e-mail: econjim@gmail.com.

Abstract

Historians disagree about whether geographic mobility on the frontier reflected economic hardship or opportunity because of the inability to observe the outcomes of non-persisters. This article uses a new sample of frontier families linked between the 1860, 1870, and 1880 U.S. censuses to study mobility and wealth accumulation. Using the incidence of Confederate guerilla warfare in frontier counties to generate exogenous migration, I find the effect of persistence on wealth accumulation is insignificant. Also, young, blue-collar, and landless families—those with the highest net benefits of migration—were the most likely to move. These findings reflect widespread economic opportunity on the frontier.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baltensperger, Bradley H. “Agricultural Adjustments to Great Plains Drought: The Republican Valley, 1870–1900.” In The Great Plains: Environment and Culture, edited by Blouet, Brian W. and Luebke, Frederick C., 4359. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Bogue, Allan. From Prairie to Corn Belt: Farming on the Illinois and Iowa Prairies in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Castel, Albert. Civil War Kansas. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cheatham, Gary L.“‘Desperate Characters’: The Development and Impact of the Confederate Guerillas in Kansas.” Kansas History 14 (Autumn 1991): 144–61.Google Scholar
Coelho, Philip R. P., and Shepherd, James F.. “Differences in Regional Prices: The United States, 1851–1880.” This Journal 34, no. 3 (1974): 551–91.Google Scholar
Curti, Merle. The Making of an American Community. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Fellman, Michael. Inside War: The Guerilla Conflict in Missouri During the American Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrie, Joseph P.Migration to the Frontier in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America: A Reexamination of Turner's ‘Safety Valve’.” Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1997.Google Scholar
Ferrie, Joseph P.Yankees Now: Immigrants in the Antebellum United States, 1840–1860. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., and Rutner, Jack L.. “The Efficiency Effects of Federal Land Policy, 1850–1900: A Report of Some Provisional Findings.” In The Dimensions of Quantitative Research in History, edited by Aydelotte, William O., Bogue, Allan G., and Fogel, Robert W., 390418. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Galenson, David W.Economic Opportunity on the Urban Frontier: Nativity, Work, and Wealth in Early Chicago.” This Journal 51, no. 3 (1991): 581603.Google Scholar
Galenson, David W., and Levy, Daniel S.. “A Note on Biases in the Measurement of Geographic Persistence Rates.” Historical Methods 19, no. 4 (1985): 171–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, David W., and Pope, Clayne L.. “Economic and Geographic Mobility on the Farming Frontier: Evidence from Appanoose County, Iowa, 1850–1870.” This Journal 49, no. 3 (1989): 635–55.Google Scholar
Geiger, Mark W.Missouri's Hidden Civil War: Financial Conspiracy and the Decline of the Planter Elite, 1861–1865.” Ph.D. diss., University of Missouri-Columbia, 2006.
Goodrich, Thomas. Black Flag: Guerilla Warfare on the Western Border, 1861–1865. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gregson, Mary Eschelbach. “Wealth Accumulation and Distribution in the Midwest in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Explorations in Economic History 33, no. 4 (1996): 524–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffen, Clyde. “Workers Divided: The Effect of Craft and Ethnic Differences in Poughkeepsie, New York, 1850–1880.” In Nineteenth-Century Cities: Essays in the New Urban History, edited by Thernstrom, Stephen and Sennett, Richard, 4997. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Herscovici, Steven. “Migration and Economic Mobility: Wealth Accumulation and Occupational Change among Antebellum Migrants and Persisters.” This Journal 58, no. 4 (1998): 927–56.Google Scholar
Hicks, John D.The Populist Revolt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Kearl, J. R., Pope, Clayne L., and Wimmer, Larry T.. “Household Wealth in a Settlement Economy: Utah, 1850–1870.” This Journal 40, no. 3 (1980): 477–96.Google Scholar
Kirk, Gordon W., and Kirk, Carolyn T.. “Migration, Mobility, and the Transformation of the Occupational Structure in an Immigrant Community: Holland, Michigan, 1850–1880.” Journal of Social History 7, no. 2 (1974): 142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libecap, Gary D., and Hansen, Zeynep K.. “‘Rain Follows the Plow’ and Dryfarming Doctrine: The Climate Information Problem and Homestead Failure in the Upper Great Plains.” This Journal 62, no. 1 (2002): 86120.Google Scholar
Malin, James C.Winter Wheat in the Golden Belt of Kansas. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1973.Google Scholar
Malin, James C. “The Turnover of Farm Population in Kansas.” In History and Ecology, edited by Swierenga, Robert P., 268–99. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mincer, Jacob. “Family Migration Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy 86 (October 1978): 749–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Donald F.A Model of Migration and Wealth Accumulation: Farmers at the Antebellum Southern Frontier.” Explorations in Economic History 24, no. 2 (1987): 130–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W.The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria.” Journal of Economic Literature 13, no. 3 (1975): 825–46.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Aba. “Interpreting the Effect of Distance on Migration.” Journal of Political Economy 81, no. 5 (1973): 1153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Fred A.The Farmer's Last Frontier: Agriculture, 1860–1897. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1945.Google Scholar
Sjaastad, Larry A.The Costs and Returns of Human Migration.” Journal of Political Economy 70, no. 5 (1962): 8093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, Douglas and Stock, James. “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica 65, no. 3 (1997): 557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, Richard H.The Economic Foundations of East-West Migration During the Nineteenth Century.” Explorations in Economic History 20, no. 1 (1983): 1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, Richard H.Household Migration and Rural Settlement in the United States, 1850–1860.” Explorations in Economic History 26, no. 2 (1989): 190218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, James I.Essays on the Economic History of the American Frontier.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, 2003.Google Scholar
Stewart, James I.Migration to the Agricultural Frontier and Wealth Accumulation, 1860-1870.” Explorations in Economic History 43, no. 4 (2006): 547–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan. Poverty and Progress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson. “Contributions of the West to American Democracy” (1903). In The Frontier in American History. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson. “The Significance of the Frontier in American History” (1893). In The Frontier in American History. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1997.Google Scholar