Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T19:50:54.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Market and Massachusetts Farmers: Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Winifred B. Rothenberg
Winifred B. Rothenberg
Affiliation:
graduate student in American economic history at Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 479 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The distinction between development and growth is fruitfully discussed by James Henretta in The Evolution of American Society 1700–1815: An Interdisciplinary Analysis (Lexington, Massachusetts, 1973), pp. 68–81.

2 Lazonick, William and Thomas Brush, “The ‘Horndal’ Effect in the Early U.S. Cotton Industry,” (April 1982), paper presented at the 23rd Annual Cliometrics Conference in Iowa City, Iowa, May 7–9, 1982;Google Scholar and Lazonick, William, “Production, Productivity, and Development: Theoretical Implications of Some Historical Research,” Discussion Paper Number 876 (January 1982), Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Harvard University.Google Scholar