Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:27:03.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determinants of Innovation Evidence from 19th Century World Fairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2004

PETRA MOSER
Affiliation:
MIT Sloan

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
SUMMARIES OF DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS
Copyright
© 2004 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berichterstattungs-Kommission der Deutschen Zollvereins-Regierungen, Amtlicher Bericht über die Industrie-Austellung aller Völker zu London im Jahre 1851. Volumes 1–3. Berlin, Prussia: Verlag der Deckerschen Geheimen Ober-Hofbuchdruckerei, Volumes 1 and 2, 1852, and Volume 3, 1853.
Cole Henry. 1853. “The International Results of the Exhibition of 1851.” Lectures on the Results of the Great Exhibition of 1851, delivered before the Society of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce, at the Suggestion of H. R. H. Prince Albert, President of the Society, Second Series, London: David Bogue
Coryton John. 1855. A Treatise on the Law of Letters-patent, for the sole use of inventions in the United Kingdome of Great Britain and Ireland; including the practice connected with the grant; to which is added a summary of the patent laws in force in the principal foreign states; with an appendix of statutes, rules, practical forms, etc., Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson
Curti Merle. 1950America at the World Fairs, 1851–1893.” The American Historical Review 55, no. 4 (July): 83356.Google Scholar
Gilbert Richard, and Shapiro Carl. 1990Optimal Patent Length and Breadth.RAND Journal of Economics 21, no. 1 (Spring): 10612.Google Scholar
Gilfillan S. C. 1930Inventiveness by Nation: A Note on Statistical Treatment.Geographical Review 20, no. 2 (April): 30104.Google Scholar
Klemperer Paul. 1990How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be?RAND Journal of Economics 21, no. 1 (Spring): 11330.Google Scholar
Kuznets Simon. 1963. “The Meaning and Measurement of Economic Growth.” In The Experience of Economic Growth, Case Studies in Economic History, edited by Barry Supple. New York: Random House
Nordhaus William D. 1969An Economic Theory of Technological Change (in Theory of Innovation).” The American Economic Review 59, no. 2 (May): 1828.Google Scholar
Rosenberg Nathan. 1972. Technology and American Economic Growth. New York: Harper
Schmookler Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Schmookler Jacob. 1962Economic Sources of Inventive Activity.” This JOURNAL 22, no. 1: 120.Google Scholar
Sokoloff Kenneth. 1988Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846.” This JOURNAL 48, no. 4: 81350.Google Scholar
United States Centennial Commission. 1876. International Exhibition 1876 Official Catalogue, Second and Revised Edition. Philadelphia: John R. Nagle and Company