Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:57:05.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Industrial Structure in Southern New England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Albert W. Niemi Jr
Albert W. Niemi Jr
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 657 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Niemi, Albert W., Jr., “New England: Gross State Product and Productivity, 1948–65” (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1969)Google Scholar.

2 The following rates of growth were computed for total real output and real manufacturing output. (Average annual.)

3 Findings from my study indicate large structural differences within southern New England and between New England and the United States.

The structural differences take on added importance in view of the negative growth rates in textiles and leather. The average annual percentage rates of change in real product were as follows: Massachusetts, textiles —3.7 and leather —1.9; Rhode Island, textiles —2.2; and Connecticut, textiles —2.2.

4 The 1860 data were taken from the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Eighth Census of the United States, Manufactures of the United States in 1860, as follows: Massachusetts, pp. 251–57; Rhode Island, pp. 549–51; and Connecticut, pp. 49–52. The industry conversion was made on the basis of the definitions in the 1963 Census of Manufactures, Industry Descriptions, U.S. Department of Commerce.