Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:04:41.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweated Industries and Sweated Labor: A Study of Industrial Disorganization and Worker Attitudes in the London Clothing Trades, 1867–1909

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

James Andrew Schmiechen
James Andrew Schmiechen
Affiliation:
Illinois State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Summaries of Doctoral Dissertations
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 283 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Clapham, J. H., An Economic History of Modern Britain (London, 1930), Vol. 1, pp. 172–3, 179Google Scholar; Vol. 2, pp. 85, 93, 131. Also, Landes, David, The Unbound Prometheus (Cambridge, 1970), p. 119.Google Scholar

2 This is the general thesis of Stedman-Jones, G., Outcast London (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar

3 See my article, “State Reform and the Local Economy: An Aspect of Industrialization in Late Victorian and Edwardian London,” Economic History Review, Vol. 28 (August, 1975).Google Scholar

4 Henry Pelling claims that the working class was reticent on the issue of social reform (Popular Politics in Late Victorian Society [London, 1968], ch. 1Google Scholar); see also, Meacham, Standish, “‘The Sense of an Impending Clash,’ English Working Class Unrest before the First World War,” American History Review, 5 (1972).Google Scholar