Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:00:08.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Did the Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity Decline over Time?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2020

Zhen Wang  and
Chu Zhang Open the ORCID record for Chu Zhang [Opens in a new window]
Zhen Wang
Affiliation:
Shanghai University SILC Business Schoolwang_zhen@shu.edu.cn
Chu Zhang*
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
*
czhang@ust.hk (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose an explanation for why corporate investment used to be sensitive to cash flow and why the sensitivity declined over time. The sensitivity stems from the informational role of cash flow in inferring the productivity of tangible capital in the old economy. Over time, however, more new-economy firms enter the market. These firms have reduced tangible capital productivity and reduced cash-flow predictability, which drives the decline in the average investment–cash flow sensitivity. Theoretical and empirical analyses support this explanation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 56 , Issue 6 , September 2021 , pp. 2272 - 2308
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Huafeng Jason Chen (the referee) and Jarrad Harford (the editor) for detailed comments that significantly improved the quality of the article. We also thank Heitor Almeida, Hursit Selcuk Celil, Sudipto Dasgupta, Ioannis Floros, Erasmo Giambona, Mark Huson, Heim Kedar-Levy, Yelena Larkin, Laura X. Liu, David McLean, Randall Morck, Vikas Mehrotra, Lilian Ng, Jacob Oded, Jiaping Qiu, and Margret Zhu and seminar/conference participants at the 2014 Asian Finance Association Annual Meeting, the 2014 China International Conference in Finance, the University of Amsterdam, Australian National University, Ben-Gurion University, Chuo University, Deakin University, Fordham University, Lancaster University, Macau University, Manchester University, Queen Mary University of London, Queensland University of Technology, Southern University of Science and Technology (China), Shanghai University, Tel Aviv University, University of Sydney, and York University for helpful comments on an earlier version. All remaining errors are ours.

References

Agca, S., and Mozumdar, A.. “The Impact of Capital Market Imperfections on Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (2008), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allayannis, G., and Mozumdar, A.. “The Impact of Negative Cash Flow and Influential Observations on Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity Estimates.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 28 (2004), 901–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, H.; Campello, M.; and Weisbach, M.. “The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 1777–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alti, A. “How Sensitive Is Investment to Cash Flow When Financing Is Frictionless?” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T.; Kahle, K.; and Stulz, R.. “Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash Than They Used To?” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1985–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., and Petersen, B.. “Why Has the Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity Declined So Sharply? Rising R&D and Equity Market Developments.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (2009), 971–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brustein, J. “Sorry, Nike, You’re a Tech Company Now.” Bloomberg Businessweek, Oct. 15, 2013.Google Scholar
Chen, H., and Chen, S.. “Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity Cannot be a Good Measure of Financial Constraints: Evidence from the Time Series.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2012), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, S. “The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisfeldt, A., and Papanikolaou, D.. “Organization Capital and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 1365–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates.” Journal of Financial Economics, 72 (2004), 229–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazzari, S.; Hubbard, R.; and Petersen, B.. “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1 (1988), 141–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadlock, C., and Pierce, J.. “New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 1909–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, F. “Tobin’s Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation.” Econometrica, 50 (1982), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S., and Zingales, L.. “Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (1997), 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. C. Y., and Hall, B.. “Depreciation of Business R&D Capital.” Review of Income and Wealth, 66 (2020), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyen, N. “Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivities: Constrained Versus Unconstrained Firms.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 2061–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H., and Taylor, L. A.. “Intangible Capital and the Investment-q Relation?” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, J. M. “Comment on ‘Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment.’” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1 (1988) 200–204.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1 (1969), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whited, T., and Wu, G.. “Financial Constraints Risk.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wang and Zhang supplementary material

Wang and Zhang supplementary material

Download Wang and Zhang supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 209.8 KB