Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T18:38:06.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bank Dividend Policy and Holding Company Affiliation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

This study compares the dividend policies of independently owned and bank holding company-affiliated commercial banks. The hypothesis tested is that there exists a significant, positive relationship between the amount of cash dividends paid by a bank and its affiliation with a holding company. The issue is an important one because the distribution of earnings as dividends obviously reduces a bank's ability to generate capital internally, and retained earnings have been the chief source of growth in bank equity capital. For some time the bank supervisory authorities have been concerned over the relative decline in importance of capital in the balance sheet of the average bank, such funds permitting banks to absorb unexpected losses and weather periods of financial crises. Capital adequacy is thus a major consideration in the regulators' assessment of bank dividend policy. Prior research has shown that the banking subsidiaries of bank holding companies have maintained lower capital in relation to assets than have other banks despite achieving greater profitability. Since a bank's capital position is usually positively correlated with its earnings, this implies that affiliated banks have been more generous in paying dividends. Indeed, the statistical evidence of this study indicates that the banking subsidiaries of holding companies paid significantly higher dividends than other banks over the four–year period from 1973 through 1976. Whether or not this has resulted in these firms maintaining less than “adequate” capital is a question that goes far beyond the scope of this paper, but which ultimately must be considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Manual of Examination Policies (various sections).Google Scholar
[2]Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Annual Report1976.Google Scholar
[3]Gupta, Manak C. and Walker, David A.. “Dividend Disbursal Practices in Commercial Banking.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 10 (09 1975), pp. 515529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Jacobs, Donald; Moag, Joseph; and Duncan, Robert. “Managing Today's Commercial Banks: Issues and Development.” Journal of Contemporary Business, Vol. 6 (Summer 1977), pp. 114.Google Scholar
[5]Jessee, Michael Alan and Seelig, Steven A.. Bank Holding Companies and the Public Interest. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books (1977).Google Scholar
[6]Mayne, Lucille S.A Comparative Study of Bank Holding Company Affiliates and Independent Banks, 1969–72.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (03 1977), pp. 147158.Google Scholar
[7]Mayne, Lucille S.Impact of Federal Bank Supervisors on Bank Capital. New York: Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University, The Bulletin, Nos. 85–86 (09 1972).Google Scholar
[8]Mingo, John J.Managerial Motives, Market Structure, and the Performance of Holding Company Banks.” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 14 (09 1976), pp. 411424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Taggart, Robert A. Jr “Regulatory Influence on Bank Capital.” New England Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 09/10 1977), pp. 3746.Google Scholar