Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:49:22.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Displacement flows under elastic membranes. Part 2. Analysis of interfacial effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2015

Gunnar G. Peng ,
Draga Pihler-Puzović ,
Anne Juel ,
Matthias Heil  and
John R. Lister
Gunnar G. Peng*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Draga Pihler-Puzović
Affiliation:
Manchester Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Anne Juel
Affiliation:
Manchester Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Matthias Heil
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Manchester Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
John R. Lister
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: G.G.Peng@damtp.cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the injection of inviscid gas into the narrow liquid-filled gap between a rigid base plate and an overlying elastic sheet. After an early-time transient in which the gas deflects the sheet into a large blister, the viscous liquid displaced by the expanding bubble starts to accumulate in a wedge which advances as the elastic sheet peels away from the base. We analyse theoretically the subsequent interaction between viscous forces, elastic (bending or tension) forces and capillary forces. Asymptotic expressions are derived for the speed of spreading of the bubble, which reveal that the effect of the capillary pressure drop at the bubble tip is to suck down the sheet over the liquid wedge and thereby reduce the speed. We show that the system passes through three different asymptotic regimes in sequence. At early times, capillary effects are weak and hence the spreading of the bubble is controlled dominantly by the viscous-peeling process at the wedge tip. The capillary forces grow in importance with time, and at late times they dominate viscous effects and balance with elastic forces, leading to quasi-static spreading. Finally, at very late times, the capillary suction generates a narrow bottleneck at the wedge tip, which pushes a large ridge of liquid ahead of it. These results hold in the framework of standard lubrication theory as well as with an improved lubrication model, which takes into account films of wetting liquid deposited behind the advancing bubble tip. The predictions of the model are shown to be in excellent agreement with the Navier–Stokes simulations and experimental results from Part 1 of this work.

JFM classification

Interfacial Flows (free surface): Capillary flows Low-Reynolds-number flows: Hele-Shaw flows Biological Fluid Dynamics: Membranes
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 784 , 10 December 2015 , pp. 512 - 547
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Housseiny, T. T., Christov, I. C. & Stone, H. A. 2013 Two-phase fluid displacement and interfacial instabilities under elastic membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 034502.Google Scholar
Audoly, B. & Pomeau, Y. 2010 Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Nonlinear Response of Shells. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balmforth, N. J., Craster, R. V. & Hewitt, I. J. 2014 The speed of an inclined ruck. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 471, 20140740.Google Scholar
Bonn, D., Eggers, J., Indekeu, J., Meunier, J. & Rolley, E. 2009 Wetting and spreading. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2), 739–805.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1961 The motion of long bubbles in tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 10 (2), 166–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1986 The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 168, 169–194.Google Scholar
Flitton, J. C. & King, J. R. 2004 Moving-boundary and fixed-domain problems for a sixth-order thin-film equation. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 15 (6), 713–754.Google Scholar
Gaver, D. P., Halpern, D., Jensen, O. E. & Grotberg, J. B. 1996 The steady motion of a semi-infinite bubble through a flexible-walled channel. J. Fluid Mech. 319, 25–65.Google Scholar
Gaver, D. P., Samsel, R. W. & Solway, J. 1990 Effects of surface tension and viscosity on airway reopening. J. Appl. Physiol. 69 (1), 74–85.Google Scholar
Heil, M. & Hazel, A. L. 2006 oomph-lib – an object-oriented multi-physics finite-element library. In Fluid-Structure Interaction (ed. Schäfer, M. & Bungartz, H.-J.), pp. 19–49. Springer. oomph-lib is available as open-source software at http://www.oomph-lib.org.Google Scholar
Heil, M & Hazel, A. L. 2011 Fluid-structure interaction in internal physiological flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 141–162.Google Scholar
Hewitt, I. J., Balmforth, N. J. & De Bruyn, J. R. 2014 Elastic-plated gravity currents. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 26 (01), 1–31.Google Scholar
Homsy, G. M. 1987 Viscous fingering in porous media. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech 19, 271–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, O. E., Horsburgh, M. K., Halpern, D. & Gaver, D. P. 2002 The steady propagation of a bubble in a flexible-walled channel: asymptotic and computational models. Phys. Fluids 14 (2), 431–442.Google Scholar
Jones, A. F. & Wilson, S. D. R. 1978 The film drainage problem in droplet coalescence. J. Fluid Mech. 87, part 2, 263–288.Google Scholar
King, J. R. & Bowen, M. 2001 Moving boundary problems and non-uniqueness for the thin film equation. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 12 (03), 321–356.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1986 Course of Theoretical Physics vol. 7: Theory of Elasticity, 3rd edn. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lister, J. R., Peng, G. G. & Neufeld, J. A. 2013 Viscous control of peeling an elastic sheet by bending and pulling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 154501.Google Scholar
McEwan, A. D. & Taylor, G. I. 1966 The peeling of a flexible strip attached by a viscous adhesive. J. Fluid Mech. 26 (01), 1–15.Google Scholar
Park, C. W. & Homsy, G. M. 1984 Two-phase displacement in Hele-Shaw cells: theory. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 291–308.Google Scholar
Pihler-Puzović, D., Illien, P., Heil, M. & Juel, A. 2012 Suppression of complex fingerlike patterns at the interface between air and a viscous fluid by elastic membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (7), 074502.Google Scholar
Pihler-Puzović, D., Juel, A. & Heil, M. 2014 The interaction between viscous fingering and wrinkling in elastic-walled Hele-Shaw cells. Phys. Fluids 26, 1–24.Google Scholar
Pihler-Puzović, D., Juel, A., Peng, G. G., Lister, J. R. & Heil, M. 2015 Displacement flows under elastic membrances. Part 1. Experiments and direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 784, 487–511.Google Scholar
Pihler-Puzović, D., Périllat, R., Russell, M., Juel, A. & Heil, M. 2013 Modelling the suppression of viscous fingering in elastic-walled Hele-Shaw cells. J. Fluid Mech. 731, 162–183.Google Scholar
Reinelt, D. A. & Saffman, P. G. 1985 The penetration of a finger into a viscous fluid in a channel and tube. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 6 (3), 542–561.Google Scholar
Voinov, O. V. 1976 Hydrodynamics of wetting. Fluid Dyn. 11 (5), 714–721.Google Scholar