Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T04:35:41.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manipulation of turbulent boundary layers by outer-layer devices: skin-friction and flow-visualization results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

A. M. Savill  and
J. C. Mumford
A. M. Savill
Affiliation:
Fluid Dynamics Section, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK Present address: Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
J. C. Mumford
Affiliation:
Fluid Dynamics Section, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK Present address: Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parametric studies have been made of devices introduced into the outer region of a low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer (Reθ = 1000-3500) with a view to understanding the manner in which such ‘manipulators’ reduce the surface drag. The devices considered were single flat plates, a cylinder with the same drag as one of these, and two plates stacked, staggered, and in tandem, with chord Reynolds numbers Rec in the range 1000-100000. Direct measurements of local skin friction using a floating-plate drag balance are reported together with the results of laser- sheet smoke flow visualization. The skin-friction results are in good agreement with other floating-element data while the visual and photographic studies in both stationary and convected frames completely support the hairpin description of the boundary-layer structure, and reveal that the wake of the device may play a more important role than has previously been suggested. A picture is presented of the interaction of the devices and their wakes with the hairpin eddy structure which could explain the magnitudes and shapes of the skin-friction distributions observed downstream; their dependence on the height, thickness, and if appropriate, length and spacing of the device(s); the optimum values for these parameters; and the existence of a preferred, tandem plate configuration. The results suggest that such plates do not act primarily as large-eddy break-up systems (LEBUs). Instead several ‘active’ mechanisms are identified which supplement the ‘passive’ effect of the imposed momentum defect. The suppression of large-scale motions is one of these, but, a t least for our relatively thick devices, it would appear that it is an interaction between the vortices, introduced into the layer via the wake, and the near-wall structure that provides the principal mechanism for reducing the skin friction. The observation that the maximum skin-friction reduction always occurred close to the position where these vortices reached the sublayer provides strong evidence for such a view.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 191 , June 1988 , pp. 389 - 418
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, M. & Escudier, M. P. 1983 Measurements of the wall shear stress in boundary layer flows. In Proc. 4th Symp. Turbulent Shear Flows, Karlsruhe, pp. 277–286. Springer.
Acton, E. & Dhanak, M. 1984 A model of the interaction between a flow manipulator and an approaching vortex. In Abstr. EUROMECH 181 (see Bertelrud et al. 1984).
Anders, J. B. 1986 Large eddy breakup devices as low Reynolds number airfoils. SAE Tech. Paper 861769.
Anders, J. B., Hefner, J. N. & Bushnell, D. M. 1984 Performance of large-eddy breakup devices at post-transitional Reynolds numbers. AIAA-84-0345.
Anders, J. B. & Watson, R. D. 1985 Airfoil Large-eddy breakup devices at post transitional Reynolds numbers. AIAA-85-0345.
Bandyopadhyay, P. R. 1986 Review - Mean flow in turbulent boundary layers disturbed to alter skin friction. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng. 108, 127–145.Google Scholar
Bertelrud, A. 1984 Full scale experiments into the use of large-eddy breakup devices for drag reduction on aircraft. In Improvement of Aerodynamic Performance Through Boundary Layer Control and High Lift Systems. AGARD Conf. Proc. vol. 365, pp. 5.1–10.
Bertelrud, A. 1986 Manipulated turbulence structure in flight. In Advances in Turbulence: Proc. European Turbuluence Conf., Lyon, pp. 524–532. Springer.
Bertelrud, A., Drougge, G. & Landahl, M. T. 1984 Drag Reduction through Boundary Layer Control - A report on EU ROMECH 181. FFA TN 1984–60.
Bertelrud, A., Truong, T. V. & Avellan, F. 1982 Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers using ribbons. AIAA-82-1370.
Bradshaw, P. 1972 Two more wind tunnels driven by aerofoil type centrifugal blowers. Imperial College Dept. Aero. Rep. 72–10.
Corke, T. C., Guezennic, Y. & Nagib, H. M. 1979 Modification in drag of turbulent boundary layers resulting from manipulation of large-scale structures. Prog. Astronaut Aeronaut 72, 128–143.Google Scholar
Corke, T. C., Nagib, H. M. & Guezennec, Y. 1982 A new view of the origin, role and manipulation of large scales in turbulent boundary layers. NASA CR 165861.
Dowling, A. P. 1985 The effect of large-eddy breakup devices on oncoming vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 160, 447–464.Google Scholar
Falco, R. E. 1979 Structural aspects of turbulence in boundary layer flows. In Proc. 6th Symp. on Turbulence in Liquids, Missouri-Rolla (ed. A. R. Patterson & L. Zakin), pp. 1–16.
Falco, R. E. 1983 New results, a review and synthesis of the mechanism of turbulence production in boundary layers and its modification. AIAA-83-0377.
Gartshore, I. S., Durban, P. A. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1983 The production of turbulent stress in a shear flow by irrotational fluctuations. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 307–330.Google Scholar
Haritonidis, J. H., Landahl, M. T. & Widnall, S. E. 1985 LEBU devices and turbulent boundary layer structure. In Abstr. ONR-NSSC-AFOSR-NASA Symp. on Drag Reduction and Boundary Layer Control, Washington, DC.
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P. R. 1981 New aspects of turbulent boundary-layer structure. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 297–338.Google Scholar
Hefner, J. N., Anders, J. B. & Bushnell, D. M. 1983 Alteration of outer flow structures for turbulent drag reduction. AIAA-83-0193.
Hefner, J. N., Weinstein, L. M. & Bushnell, D. M. 1979 Large-eddy break-up scheme for turbulent viscous drag reduction. Prog. Astronaut Aeronaut 72, 110–127.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1970 Turbulent flow regions with shear stress and mean velocity gradient of opposite sign. Appl. Sci. Res. 22, 163–175.Google Scholar
Hoerner, S. F. 1965 Fluid-dynamic Drag: Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance, 2nd Edn. Published by The author, New Jersey, USA.
Kinney, R. B., Taslim, M. E. & Mung, S. C. 1984 Numerical study of large-eddy breakup and its effect on the drag characteristics of boundary layers. University of Arizona Dept. Aerosp. & Mech. Eng. Tech. Rep. NAG-1-141.
Lemay, J., Provencal, D., Gordeau, R., Nguyen, V. D. & Dickinson, J. 1985 More detailed measurements behind turbulence manipulators including tandem devices using servocontrolled balances. AIAA-85-0621.
Loerke, R. I. & Nagib, H. M. 1972 Experiments on the management of free stream turbulence. AGARD Rep. 598.
Loerke, R. L. & Nagib, H. M. 1976 Control of free stream turbulence by means of honeycombs: A balance between suppression and generation Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 98, 342–353.Google Scholar
Mumford, J. C. & Savill, A. M. 1984 Parametric studies of flat plate, turbulence manipulators including direct drag results and laser flow visualisation. In Laminar Turbulent Boundary Layers Their Control and Flow Over Compliant and Other Surfaces, vol. 11, pp. 41–51. Fluids Eng. Div. ASME.
Nguyen, V. D., Dickinson, J., Jean, Y., Chalifour, Y., Anderson, J., Lemay, J., Haeberle, D. & Larose, G. 1984a Some experimental observations of the law of the wall behind largeeddy breakup devices using servo-controlled skin friction balances. AIAA-84-0346.
Nguyen, V. D., Dickinson, J., Lemay, J., Provencal, D., Jean, Y. & Chalifour, Y. 1984b The determination of turbulent skin friction behind flat plate turbulence manipulators using servo-controlled balances. In Proc. 14th ICAS Congr., Toulouse, pp. 1–6.
Nguyen, V. D., Savill, A. M. & Westphal, R. V. 1987 Direct local skin friction measurements following turbulence manipulation. AIAA J. 25, 498–500.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173–218.Google Scholar
Plesniak, M. W. & Nagib, H. M. 1985 Net drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers resulting from optimised manipulation. AIAA-85-0518.
Poll, D. I. A. & Watson, R. D. 1984 On the relaxation of a turbulent boundary layer after an encounter with a forward facing step. In Improvement of Aerodynamic Performance Through Boundary Layer Control and High Lift Systems. AGAR Conf. Proc. vol. 365, pp. 18.1–10.
Sandborn, V. A. 1981 Control of surface shear stress fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers. Colorado State University Rep. CER 80–81 VAS 46.
Savill, A. M. 1979 Effects on turbulence of curved or distorting mean flow. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Savill, A. M. 1984 The skin friction reduction mechanisms of flat plate, turbulence manipulators. In Abstr. EUROMECH 181 (see Bertelrud et al. 1984).
Savill, A. M. 1986 On the manner in which outer layer disturbances affect turbulent boundary layer skin friction. In Advances in Turbulence: Proc. European Turbulence Conf., Lyon, pp. 533–545. Springer.
Savill, A. M. & Zhou, M. D. 1983 Wake/boundary layer and wake/wake interactions - Smoke flow visualisation and modelling. In Proc. 2nd Asian Congr. Fluid Mech. Beijing, pp. 743–755. China: Science Press.
Takagi, S. 1983a The structure of turbulent boundary layer controlled by the plates. In Proc. 15th Turbulence Symp., Tokyo.
Takagi, S. 1983b On the mechanism of drag reduction in a turbulent boundary layer using a thin plate. In Proc. 2nd Asian Congr. Fluid Mech., Beijing, p. 292. China: Science Press.
Truong, T. V., Bertelrud, A. & Veuve, M. 1984 Boundary layer development downstream of transverse ribbons. In Abstr. EUROMECH 181 (see Bertelrud et al. 1984).
Tsiolakis, E. P., Krause, E. & Muller, U. R. 1983 Turbulent boundary layer-wake interaction. In Proc. 4th Symp. Turbulent Shear Flows, Karlsruhe, pp. 287–298. Springer.
Veuve, M. & Truong, T. V. 1984 Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers using thin transverse ribbons. In Abstr. EUROMECH 181 (see Bertelrud et al. 1984).
Wallace, J. M., Balint, J.-L., Mauriaux, J.-L. & Morel, R. 1983 Observations on the nature and mechanism of turbulent boundary layers: A survey and new results. In Proc. ASCE EMD Speciality Conf., Purdue University, pp. 1–6.
Westphal, R. V. 1986 Skin friction and Reynolds stress measurements for a turbulent boundary layer following manipulation using flat plates. AIAA-86-0283.
Winter, K. G. 1977 An outline of the techniques available for the measurement of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 18, 1–57.Google Scholar
Yajnik, K. S. & Acharya, M. 1977 Non-equilibrium effects in a turbulent boundary layer due to the destruction of large eddies. In Structure and Mechanisms of Turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 76, pp. 249–260. Springer.
Zhou, M. D. & Squire, L. C. 1985 The interaction of a wake with a boundary layer. Aeronaut. J. 89, 72–81.Google Scholar