Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:44:46.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Goldilocks mixing in oceanic shear-induced turbulent overturns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2021

A. Mashayek Open the ORCID record for A. Mashayek [Opens in a new window] ,
C.P. Caulfield Open the ORCID record for C.P. Caulfield [Opens in a new window]  and
M.H. Alford Open the ORCID record for M.H. Alford [Opens in a new window]
A. Mashayek
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, LondonSW7 2BX, UK
C.P. Caulfield
Affiliation:
BP Institute for Multiphase Flow, University of Cambridge, Madingley Rise, Madingley Road, CambridgeCB3 0EZ, UK Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Rd, CambridgeCB3 0WA, UK
M.H. Alford*
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: mashayek@ic.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a new, simple and physically motivated parameterization, based on the ratio of Thorpe and Ozmidov scales, for the irreversible turbulent flux coefficient $\varGamma _{\mathcal {M}}= {\mathcal {M}}/\epsilon$, i.e. the ratio of the irreversible rate ${\mathcal {M}}$ at which the background potential energy increases in a stratified flow due to macroscopic motions to the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy $\epsilon$. Our parameterization covers all three key phases (crucially, in time) of a shear-induced stratified turbulence life cycle: the initial, ‘hot’ growing phase, the intermediate energetically forced phase and the final ‘cold’ fossilization decaying phase. Covering all three phases allows us to highlight the importance of the intermediate one, to which we refer as the ‘Goldilocks’ phase due to its apparently optimal (and so neither too hot nor too cold, but just right) balance, in which energy transfer from background shear to the turbulent mixing is most efficient. The value of $\varGamma _{\mathcal {M}}$ is close to 1/3 during this phase, which we demonstrate appears to be related to an adjustment towards a critical or marginal Richardson number for sustained turbulence ${\sim }0.2\text {--}0.25$. Importantly, although buoyancy effects are still significant at leading order for the turbulent dynamics during this intermediate phase, the marginal balance in the flow ensures that the turbulent mixing of the (density) scalar is nevertheless effectively ‘locked’ to the turbulent mixing of momentum. We present supporting evidence for our parameterization through comparison with six oceanographic datasets that span various turbulence generation regimes and a wide range of geographical location and depth. Using these observations, we highlight the significance of parameterizing an inherently variable flux coefficient for capturing the turbulent flux associated with rare energetic, yet fundamentally shear-driven (and so not strongly stratified) overturns that make a disproportionate contribution to the total mixing. We also highlight the importance of representation of young turbulent patches in the parameterization for connecting the small scale physics to larger scale applications of mixing such as ocean circulation and tracer budgets. Shear-induced turbulence is therefore central to irreversible mixing in the world's oceans, apparently even close to the seafloor, and it is critically important to appreciate the inherent time dependence and evolution of mixing events: history matters to mixing.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Stratified flows Geophysical and Geological Flows: Ocean processes
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 928 , 10 December 2021 , A1
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alford, M. & Pinkel, R. 2000 Patterns of turbulent and double-diffusive phenomena: observations from a rapid-profiling microconductivity probe. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 30 (5), 833–854.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, M.H., Girton, J.B., Voet, G., Carter, G.S., Mickett, J.B. & Klymak, J.M. 2013 Turbulent mixing and hydraulic control of abyssal water in the Samoan Passage. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40 (17), 4668–4674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, H. & Peters, H. 2000 Second-moment closures and length scales for weakly stratified turbulent shear flows. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 105, 6453–6468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouffard, D. & Boegman, L. 2013 A diapycnal diffusivity model for stratified environmental flows. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans. 61–62, 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Billant, P., Lindborg, E. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2007 Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cael, B.B. & Mashayek, A. 2020 Log-skew-normality of ocean turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 224502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, D.R. 1983 Oceanic turbulence: big bangs or continuous creation? J. Geophys. Res. 88 (C12), 7543–7550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, G.S., Voet, G., Alford, M.H., Girton, J.B., Mickett, J.B., Klymak, J.M., Pratt, L.J., Pearson-Potts, K.A., Cusack, J.M. & Tan, S. 2019 A spatial geography of abyssal turbulent mixing in the samoan passage. Oceanography 32 (4), 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, C.P. 2021 Layering, instabilities, and mixing in turbulent stratified flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53 (1), 113–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, C.P. & Peltier, W.R. 2000 Anatomy of the mixing transition in homogeneous and stratified free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 413, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, C.P. 2020 Open questions in turbulent stratified mixing: do we even know what we do not know? Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 110518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalamalla, V.K. & Sarkar, S. 2015 Mixing, dissipation rate, and their overturn-based estimates in a near-bottom turbulent flow driven by internal tides. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 45 (8), 1969–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimoli, L., Caulfield, C.P., Johnson, H.L.., Marshall, D.P., Mashayek, A., Naveira Garabato, A.C. & Vic, C. 2019 Sensitivity of deep ocean mixing to local internal tide breaking and mixing efficiency. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 (24), 14622–14633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, L., Thurnherr, A.M. & St. Laurent, L.C. 2017 Turbulent mixing in a deep fracture zone on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 47 (8), 1873–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lavergne, C., Madec, G., Le Sommer, J., Nurser, A.J.G. & Garabato, A.C.N. 2016 The impact of a variable mixing efficiency on the abyssal overturning. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 46 (2), 663–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deusebio, E., Caulfield, C.P. & Taylor, J.R. 2015 The intermittency boundary in stratified plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 781, 298–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, T.M. 1982 Vertical overturns: a comparison of Thorpe and Ozmidov length scales. J. Geophys. Res. 87 (C12), 9601–9613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, R., Mashayek, A., McDougall, T.J., Nikurashin, M. & Campin, J.-M. 2016 Turning ocean mixing upside down. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 46 (7), 2239–2261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferron, B., Mercier, H., Speer, K., Gargett, A. & Polzin, K. 1998 Mixing in the Romanche fracture zone. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 28 (10), 1929–1945.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritts, D.C., Bizon, C., Werne, J.A. & Meyer, C.K. 2003 Layering accompanying turbulence generation due to shear instability and gravity-wave breaking. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. (1984–2012) 108 (D8), 8452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garanaik, A. & Venayagamoorthy, S.K. 2019 On the inference of the state of turbulence and mixing efficiency in stably stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 867, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, W.R., Lavery, A.C., Scully, M.E. & Trowbridge, J.H. 2010 Mixing by shear instability at high Reynolds number. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L22607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C.H. 1987 Fossil turbulence and intermittency in sampling oceanic mixing processes. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans (1978–2012) 92 (C5), 5383–5404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, M.C. 1987 Diapycnal mixing in the thermocline: a review. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 92 (C5), 5249–5286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, M.C., D'Asaro, E.A., Riley, J.J. & Kunze, E. 2018 Mixing efficiency in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 10 (1), 443–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, L.N. 1961 Note on a paper of John W. Miles. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howland, C.J., Taylor, J.R. & Caulfield, C.P. 2018 Testing linear marginal stability in stratified shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 839, R4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijichi, T. & Hibiya, T. 2018 Observed variations in turbulent mixing efficiency in the deep ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 48 (8), 1815–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijichi, T., St. Laurent, L., Polzin, K.L. & Toole, J.M. 2020 How variable is mixing efficiency in the Abyss? Geophys. Res. Lett. 47 (7), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itsweire, E.C., Koseff, J.R., Briggs, D.A. & Ferziger, J.H. 1993 Turbulence in stratified shear flows: implications for interpreting shear-induced mixing in the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23 (7), 1508–1522.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, G.N. & Imberger, J. 1991 On the nature of turbulence in a stratified fluid. Part I: the energetics of mixing. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 21, 650–658.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, G.N., Winters, K.B. & Koseff, J.R. 2008 Density stratification, turbulence, but how much mixing? Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, A.K. & Smyth, W.D. 2019 Stratified shear instability in a field of pre-existing turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 862, 639–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, H. & Phillips, O.M. 1969 On the penetration of a turbulent layer into stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 37 (4), 643–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N. 1941 The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. C. R. Acad. Sci. USSR 30, 301–305.Google Scholar
Lien, R.-C., Caldwell, D.R., Gregg, M.C. & Moum, J.N. 1995 Turbulence variability at the equator in the central Pacific at the beginning of the 1991–1993 El Nino. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 100 (C4), 6881–6898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozovatsky, I.D. & Fernando, H.J.S. 2013 Mixing efficiency in natural flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 371 (1982), 20120123.Google ScholarPubMed
MacKinnon, J.A., et al. 2017 Climate process team on internal wave–driven ocean mixing. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98 (11), 2429–2454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffioli, A., Brethouwer, G. & Lindborg, E. 2019 Mixing efficiency in stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 794, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A., Caulfield, C.P. & Peltier, W.R. 2017 a Role of overturns in optimal mixing in stratified mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 826, 522–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A., Caulfield, C.P. & Peltier, W.R. 2013 Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux. J. Fluid Mech. 736, 570–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A., Ferrari, R., Merrifield, S., Ledwell, J.R., St. Laurent, L. & Garabato, A.N. 2017 b Topographic enhancement of vertical turbulent mixing in the Southern Ocean. Nat. Commun. 8, 14197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mashayek, A., Ferrari, R., Nikurashin, M. & Peltier, W.R. 2015 Influence of enhanced abyssal diapycnal mixing on stratification and the ocean overturning circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 45 (10), 2580–2597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W.R. 2011 a Three-dimensionalization of the stratified mixing layer at high Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 23, 111701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W.R. 2011 b Turbulence transition in stratified atmospheric and oceanic shear flows: Reynolds and Prandtl number controls upon the mechanism. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (16), L16612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W.R. 2012 a The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 1. Shear aligned convection, pairing, and braid instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W.R. 2012 b The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 2. The influence of stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W.R. 2013 Shear-induced mixing in geophysical flows: does the route to turbulence matter to its efficiency? J. Fluid Mech. 725, 216–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A., Salehipour, H., Bouffard, D., Caulfield, C.P., Ferrari, R., Nikurashin, M., Peltier, W.R. & Smyth, W.D. 2017 c Efficiency of turbulent mixing in the Abyssal ocean circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 (12), 6296–6306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mater, B.D. & Venayagamoorthy, S.K. 2014 A unifying framework for parameterizing stably stratified shear-flow turbulence. Phys. Fluids 26 (3), 36601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mater, B.D., Venayagamoorthy, S.K., St. Laurent, L. & Moum, J.N. 2015 Biases in thorpe-scale estimates of turbulence dissipation. Part I: assessments from large-scale overturns in oceanographic data. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 45 (10), 2497–2521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, J.W. 1961 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monismith, S.G., Koseff, J.R. & White, B.L. 2018 Mixing efficiency in the presence of stratification: when is it constant? Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 (11), 5627–5634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moum, J.N. 1996 Efficiency of mixing in the main thermocline. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (C5), 12–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikurashin, M. & Legg, S. 2011 A mechanism for local dissipation of internal tides generated at rough topography. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 378–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oglethorpe, R.L.F., Caulfield, C.P. & Woods, A.W. 2013 Spontaneous layering in stratified turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 721, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsthoorn, J. & Dalziel, S.B. 2015 Vortex-ring-induced stratified mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 781, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, T.R. 1980 Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 83–89.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y.G., Whitehead, J.A. & Gnanadeskian, A. 1994 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids: layer formation and energetics. J. Fluid Mech. 279, 279–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, W.R. & Caulfield, C.P. 2003 Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polzin, K.L., Toole, J.M., Ledwell, J.R. & Schmitt, R.W. 1997 Spatial variability of turbulent mixing in the Abyssal ocean. Science 276 (5309), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portwood, G.D., de Bruyn Kops, S.M. & Caulfield, C.P. 2019 Asymptotic dynamics of high dynamic range stratified turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 194504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portwood, G.D., de Bruyn Kops, S.M., Taylor, J.R., Salehipour, H. & Caulfield, C.P. 2016 Robust identification of dynamically distinct regions in stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 807, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Reeuwijk, M., Holzner, M. & Caulfield, C.P. 2019 Mixing and entrainment are suppressed in inclined gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 873, 786–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehipour, H. & Peltier, W.R. 2015 Diapycnal diffusivity, turbulent Prandtl number and mixing efficiency in Boussinesq stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 775, 464–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehipour, H., Peltier, W.R. & Caulfield, C.P. 2018 Self-organised criticality of turbulence in strongly stratified mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 856, 228–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, U. & Gerz, T. 1995 Turbulent mixing in stably stratified shear flows. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34 (1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotti, A. 2015 Biases in thorpe-scale estimates of turbulence dissipation. Part II: energetics arguments and turbulence simulations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 45 (10), 2522–2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, F.S., Imberger, J. & Corcos, G.M. 1978 Turbulence and mixing in stably stratified waters. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10 (1), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, L.H., Koseff, J.R., Ivey, G.N. & Ferziger, J.H. 2005 Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.A. 2020 A comparison of two methods using thorpe sorting to estimate mixing. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 37 (1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W.D. 2020 Marginal instability and the efficiency of ocean mixing. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 50, 2141–2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W.D., Moum, J. & Caldwell, D. 2001 The efficiency of mixing in turbulent patches: inferences from direct simulations and microstructure observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31, 1969–1992.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W.D. & Moum, J.N. 2000 Length scales of turbulence in stably stratified mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 12, 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W.D., Nash, J.D. & Moum, J.N. 2019 Self-organized criticality in geophysical turbulence. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 3747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, G.I. 1935 Statistical theory of turbulence IV-diffusion in a turbulent air stream. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 151 (873), 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S.A., Smyth, W.D. & Li, L. 2013 The effect of small viscosity and diffusivity on the marginal stability of stably stratified shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 731, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S.A. 2005 The Turbulent Ocean. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S.A. & Liu, Z. 2009 Marginal instability? J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39, 2373–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J.S. 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. 2019 Mixing versus stirring. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, A.F., et al. 2014 Global patterns of diapycnal mixing from measurements of the turbulent dissipation rate. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44 (7), 1854–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, J. 1992 Vertical diffusivity and overturning length in stably stratified turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. 97 (21), 653–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M., Cenedese, C. & Caulfield, C.P. 2010 The relationship between flux coefficient $\varGamma$ and entrainment ratio E in density currents. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 2713–2727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, K., Lombard, P., Riley, J. & D'Asaro, E.A. 1995 Available potential energy and mixing in density-stratified fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, A.W., Caulfield, C.P., Landel, J.R. & Kuesters, A. 2010 Non-invasive mixing across a density interface in a turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, J.D. 1968 Wave-induced shear instability in the summer thermocline. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 791–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Q., Taylor, J.R. & Caulfield, C.P. 2017 Self-similar mixing in stratified plane Couette flow for varying Prandtl number. J. Fluid Mech. 820, 86–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar