Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:34:11.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inertially driven inhomogeneities in violently collapsing bubbles: the validity of the Rayleigh–Plesset equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2002

HAO LIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1740, USA
BRIAN D. STOREY
Affiliation:
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Needham, MA 02492-1245, USA
ANDREW J. SZERI
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1740, USA

Abstract

When a bubble collapses mildly the interior pressure field is spatially uniform; this is an assumption often made to close the Rayleigh–Plesset equation of bubble dynamics. The present work is a study of the self-consistency of this assumption, particularly in the case of violent collapses. To begin, an approximation is developed for a spatially non-uniform pressure field, which in a violent collapse is inertially driven. Comparisons of this approximation show good agreement with direct numerical solutions of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations with heat and mass transfer. With knowledge of the departures from pressure uniformity in strongly forced bubbles, one is in a position to develop criteria to assess when pressure uniformity is a physically valid assumption, as well as the significance of wave motion in the gas. An examination of the Rayleigh–Plesset equation reveals that its solutions are quite accurate even in the case of significant inertially driven spatial inhomogeneity in the pressure field, and even when wave-like motions in the gas are present. This extends the range of utility of the Rayleigh–Plesset equation well into the regime where the Mach number is no longer small; at the same time the theory sheds light on the interior of a strongly forced bubble.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)