Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:55:18.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lift and drag in two-dimensional steady viscous and compressible flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2015

L. Q. Liu ,
J. Y. Zhu  and
J. Z. Wu
L. Q. Liu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
J. Y. Zhu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
J. Z. Wu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: jzwu@coe.pku.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the lift and drag experienced by a body in a two-dimensional, viscous, compressible and steady flow. By a rigorous linear far-field theory and the Helmholtz decomposition of the velocity field, we prove that the classic lift formula $L=-{\it\rho}_{0}U{\it\Gamma}_{{\it\phi}}$, originally derived by Joukowski in 1906 for inviscid potential flow, and the drag formula $D={\it\rho}_{0}UQ_{{\it\psi}}$, derived for incompressible viscous flow by Filon in 1926, are universally true for the whole field of viscous compressible flow in a wide range of Mach number, from subsonic to supersonic flows. Here, ${\it\Gamma}_{{\it\phi}}$ and $Q_{{\it\psi}}$ denote the circulation of the longitudinal velocity component and the inflow of the transverse velocity component, respectively. We call this result the Joukowski–Filon theorem (J–F theorem for short). Thus, the steady lift and drag are always exactly determined by the values of ${\it\Gamma}_{{\it\phi}}$ and $Q_{{\it\psi}}$, no matter how complicated the near-field viscous flow surrounding the body might be. However, velocity potentials are not directly observable either experimentally or computationally, and hence neither are the J–F formulae. Thus, a testable version of the J–F formulae is also derived, which holds only in the linear far field. Due to their linear dependence on the vorticity, these formulae are also valid for statistically stationary flow, including time-averaged turbulent flow. Thus, a careful RANS (Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes) simulation is performed to examine the testable version of the J–F formulae for a typical airfoil flow with Reynolds number $Re=6.5\times 10^{6}$ and free Mach number $M\in [0.1,2.0]$. The results strongly support and enrich the J–F theorem. The computed Mach-number dependence of $L$ and $D$ and its underlying physics, as well as the physical implications of the theorem, are also addressed.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: Aerodynamics Compressible Flows: Compressible Flows Vortex Flows: Vortex Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 784 , 10 December 2015 , pp. 304 - 341
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackroyd, J. A. D., Axcell, B. P. & Ruban, A. I. 2001 Early Developments of Modern Aerodynamics. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, L. W., Williams, D. H. & Taylor, G. I. 1926 An investigation of the flow of air around an aerofoil of infinite span. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 225, 199–245.Google Scholar
Chadwick, E. 1998 The far-field Oseen velocity expansion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 2059–2082.Google Scholar
Cole, J. D. & Cook, L. P. 1986 Transonic Aerodynamics. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cook, P. H., McDonald, M. A. & Firmin, M. C. P.1979 Aerofoil RAE 2822 – pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements. AGARD-AR-138.Google Scholar
Filon, L. N. G. 1926 The forces on a cylinder in a stream of viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 113, 7–27.Google Scholar
Finn, R. & Gilbarg, D. 1957 Asymptotic behavior and uniqueness of plane subsonic flows. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 10, 23–63.Google Scholar
Finn, R. & Gilbarg, D. 1958 Uniqueness and the force formulas for plane subsonic flows. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 88, 375–379.Google Scholar
Galdi, G. P. 1994 An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations. vol. II. Springer.Google Scholar
Hafez, M. & Wahba, E. 2007 Simulations of viscous transonic flows over lifting airfoils and wings. Comput. Fluids 36, 39–52.Google Scholar
Heaslet, M. A. & Lomax, H. 1954 Supersonic and transonic small perturbation theory. In General Theory of High Speed Aerodynamics (ed. Sear, W. R.), High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion, vol. VI, pp. 122–344. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Imai, I. 1951 On the asymptotic behaviour of viscous fluid flow at a great distance from a cylindrical body, with special reference to Filon’s paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 208, 487–516.Google Scholar
Jowkowski, N. E. 1906 On annexed vortices. Proc. Phys. Section of the Natural Science Society 13 (2), 12–25 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kutta, W. 1902 Lift forces in flowing fluids. Illustrated Aeronaut. Commun. 3, 133–135 (in German).Google Scholar
Lagerstrom, P. A. 1964 Laminar Flow Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lagerstrom, P. A., Cole, J. D. & Trilling, L. 1949 Problems in the Theory of Viscous Compressible Fluids. California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Viscosity effects in sound waves of finite amplitude. In Surveys in Mechanics (ed. Batchelor, G. K. & Davies, R. M.), pp. 250–351. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 Introduction. Boundary layer theory. In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. Rosenhead, L.), pp. 46–113. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, L. Q., Wu, J. Z., Shi, Y. P. & Zhu, J. Y. 2014a A dynamic counterpart of Lamb vector in viscous compressible aerodynamics. Fluid Dyn. Res. 46, 061417.Google Scholar
Liu, L. Q., Shi, Y. P., Zhu, J. Y., Su, W. D., Zou, S. F. & Wu, J. Z. 2014b Longitudinal-transverse aerodynamic force in viscous compressible complex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 756, 226–251.Google Scholar
Liu, T. S., Wu, J. Z., Zhu, J. Y., Zou, S. F. & Liu, L. Q.2015 The origin of lift revisited: I. A complete physical theory. AIAA Paper No. 2015–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, F.2011 Multi-process theory of compressible flow. Doctor thesis, Peking University (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Mao, F., Shi, Y. P. & Wu, J. Z. 2010 On a general theory for compressing process and aeroacoustics: linear analysis. Acta Mechanica Sin. 26, 355–364.Google Scholar
Mele, B. & Tognaccini, R. 2014 Aerodynamic force by Lamb vector integrals in compressible flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 056104.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1992 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, W. R. 1986 Some recent developments in airfoil theory. AIAA J. 23, 490–499.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. L. & Salas, M. D. 1986 Far-field boundary conditions for transonic lifting solutions to the Euler equations. AIAA J. 24, 1074–1080.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Z., Ma, H. Y. & Zhou, M. D. 2006 Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. Z., Ma, H. Y. & Zhou, M. D. 2015 Vortical Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Z. & Wu, J. M. 1993 Interactions between a solid-surface and a viscous compressible flow-field. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 183–211.Google Scholar
Wu, T. Y. 1956 Small perturbations in the unsteady flow of a compressible, viscous and heat conducting fluid. J. Math. Phys. 35, 13–27.Google Scholar