Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:24:57.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress gradient balance layers and scale hierarchies in wall-bounded turbulent flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2005

P. FIFE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
T. WEI
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
J. KLEWICKI
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
P. McMURTRY
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

Abstract

Steady Couette and pressure-driven turbulent channel flows have large regions in which the gradients of the viscous and Reynolds stresses are approximately in balance (stress gradient balance regions). In the case of Couette flow, this region occupies the entire channel. Moreover, the relevant features of pressure-driven channel flow throughout the channel can be obtained from those of Couette flow by a simple transformation. It is shown that stress gradient balance regions are characterized by an intrinsic hierarchy of ‘scaling layers’ (analogous to the inner and outer domains), filling out the stress gradient balance region except for locations near the wall. The spatial extent of each scaling layer is found asymptotically to be proportional to its distance from the wall.

There is a rigorous connection between the scaling hierarchy and the mean velocity profile. This connection is through a certain function $A(y^+)$ defined in terms of the hierarchy, which remains $O(1)$ for all $y^+$. The mean velocity satisfies an exact logarithmic growth law in an interval of the hierarchy if and only if $A$ is constant. Although $A$ is generally not constant in any such interval, it is arguably almost constant under certain circumstances in some regions. These results are obtained completely independently of classical inner/outer/overlap scaling arguments, which require more restrictive assumptions.

The possible physical implications of these theoretical results are discussed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)