Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:56:25.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transition study for asymmetric reflection between moving incident shock waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2021

Miao-Miao Wang  and
Zi-Niu Wu Open the ORCID record for Zi-Niu Wu [Opens in a new window]
Miao-Miao Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China
Zi-Niu Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: ziniuwu@tsinghua.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The transition criteria seen from the ground frame are studied in this paper for asymmetrical reflection between shock waves moving at constant linear speed. To limit the size of the parameter space, these criteria are considered in detail for the reduced problem where the upper incident shock wave is moving and the lower one is steady, and a method is provided for extension to the general problem where both the upper and lower ones are unsteady. For the reduced problem, we observe that, in the shock angle plane, shock motion lowers or elevates the von Neumann condition in a global way depending on the direction of shock motion, and this change becomes less important for large shock angle. The effect of shock motion on the detachment condition, though small, displays non-monotonicity. The shock motion changes the transition criteria through altering the effective Mach number and shock angle, and these effects add for small shock angle and mutually cancel for large shock angle, so that shock motion has a less important effect for large shock angle. The role of the effective shock angle is not monotonic on the detachment condition, explaining the observed non-monotonicity for the role of shock motion on the detachment condition. Furthermore, it is found that the detachment condition has a wavefunction form that can be approximated as a hybrid of a sinusoidal function and a linear function of the shock angle.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Shock waves Compressible Flows: Supersonic flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 929 , 25 December 2021 , A26
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ben-Dor, G. 2007 Shock Wave Reflection Phenomena. Springer: Imprint: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dor, G., Igra, O. & Elperin, T. 2001 Handbook of Shock Waves. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G., Ivanov, M., Vasilev, E.I. & Elperin, T. 2002 Hysteresis processes in the regular reflection2 Mach reflection transition in steady flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38, 347–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chpoun, A., Passerel, D., Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1995 Reconsideration of the oblique shock wave reflection in steady flows. Part 1. Experimental investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 301, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, G. & Yi, T.H. 2000 Unsteady oblique shock waves. Shock Waves 10, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L.F. & Lozzi, A. 1975 Experiments on transition of Mach reflection. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, H.G. 2014 Mach reflection in steady flow. I. Mikhail Ivanov's contributions, II. Caltech stability experiments. AIP Conf. Proc. 1628, 1384–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, H.G., Oertel, H. & Sandeman, R.J. 1979 Transition to Mach reflection of shock waves in steady and pseudo-steady flows with and without relaxation. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, M.S., Ben-Dor, G., Elperin, T., Kudryavtsev, A. & Khotyanovsky, D. 2001 Flow-Mach-number-variation-induced hysteresis in steady flow shock wave reflections. AIAA J. 39, 972–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, M.S., Ben-Dor, G., Elperin, T., Kudryavtsev, A.N. & Khotyanovsky, D.V. 2002 The reflection of asymmetric shock waves in steady flows: a numerical investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 469, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, M.S., Klemenkov, G.P., Kudryavtsev, A.N., Fomin, V.M. & Kharitonov, A.M. 1997 Experimental investigation of transition to Mach reflection of steady shock waves. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 357 (5), 623–627.Google Scholar
Ivanov, M.S., Kudryavtsev, A.N. & Khotyanovskii, D.V. 2000 Numerical simulation of the transition between the regular and Mach reflection of shock waves under the action of local perturbations. Dokl. Phys. 45 (7), 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, M.S., Markelov, G.N., Kudryavtsev, A.N. & Gimelshein, S.E. 1998 Numerical analysis of shock wave reflection transition in steady flows. AIAA J. 36, 2079–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudryavtsev, A.N., Khotyanovsky, D.V., Ivanov, M.S., Hadjadj, A. & Vandromme, D. 2002 Numerical investigations of transition between regular and Mach reflections caused by free-stream disturbances. Shock Waves 12, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laguarda, L., Hickel, S., Schrijer, F.F.J. & van Oudheusden, B.W. 2020 Dynamics of unsteady asymmetric shock interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 888, A18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1996 Application of the principle of minimum entropy production to shock wave reflections. I. Steady flows. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 2027–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Chpoun, A. & Ben-Dor, G. 1999 Analytical and experimental investigations of the reflection of asymmetric shock waves in steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 390, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.G., Gao, B. & Wu, Z.N. 2011 Time history of regular to Mach reflection transition in steady supersonic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 682, 160–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheis, J. & Hickel, S. 2015 On the transition between regular and irregular shock patterns of shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 776, 200–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouton, C.A. & Hornung, H.G. 2007 Mach stem height and growth rate predictions. AIAA J. 45, 1977–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidoo, K. & Skews, B.W. 2011 Dynamic effects on the transition between two-dimensional regular and Mach reflection of shock waves in an ideal, steady supersonic free stream. J. Fluid Mech. 676, 432–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidoo, K. & Skews, B.W. 2014 Dynamic transition from Mach to regular reflection of shock waves in a steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. 1943 Oblique reflection of shock. Explos. Res. Rep. 12. Navy Dept., Bureau of Ordinance, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. 1945 Refraction, intersection and reflection of shock waves. NAVORD Rep. 203–245. Navy Dept., Bureau of Ordinance, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Skews, B.W. & Ashworth, J.T. 2005 The physical nature of weak shock wave reflection. J. Fluid Mech. 542, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teshukov, V.M. 1989 On stability of RR of shock waves. Prikl. Mekh. Techn. Fiz. 2, 26–33.Google Scholar
Touré, P.S.R. & Schülein, E. 2020 Scaling for steady and traveling shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. Exp. Fluids 61, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuillon, J., Zeitoun, D. & Ben-Dor, G. 1995 Reconstruction of oblique shock wave reflection in steady flows. Part 2. Numerical investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 301, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M.M. & Wu, Z.N. 2021 Reflection of a moving shock wave over an oblique shock wave. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34, 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar