Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T14:04:02.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A two-dimensional boundary layer encountering a three-dimensional hump

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

F. T. Smith ,
R. I. Sykes  and
P. W. M. Brighton
F. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London
R. I. Sykes
Affiliation:
Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, England
P. W. M. Brighton
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A shallow three-dimensional hump disturbs the two-dimensional incompressible boundary layer developed on an otherwise flat surface. The steady laminar flow is studied by means of a three-dimensional extension of triple-deck theory, so that there is the prospect of separation in the nonlinear motion. As a first step, however, a linearized analysis valid for certain shallow obstacles gives some insight into the flow properties. The most striking features then are the reversal of the secondary vortex motions and the emergence of a ‘corridor’ in the wake of the hump. The corridor stays of constant width downstream and within it the boundary-layer displacement and skin-friction perturbation are much greater than outside. Extending outside the corridor, there is a zone where the surface fluid is accelerated, in contrast with the deceleration near the centre of the corridor. The downstream decay (e.g. of displacement) here is much slower than in two-dimensional flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , 1 November 1977 , pp. 163 - 176
Copyright
© 1977 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brighton, P. W. M. 1977 Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (to be submitted).
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 1965 Tables of Integrals, Series and Products. Academic Press.
Jackson, P. S. 1973 The flow round obstacles in boundary layers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Sedney, R. 1973 A survey of the effects of small protuberances on boundary layer flows, A.I.A.A. J. 11, 782.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1973 Laminar flow over a small hump on a flat plate. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 803.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1976a Pipeflows distorted by nonsymmetric indentation or branching. Mathematika 23, 62.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1976b On entry-flow effects in bifurcating, blocked or constricted tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 709.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. & Stewartson, K. 1973 On slot-injection into a supersonic laminar boundary layer. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 332, 1.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1970 On laminar boundary layers near corners. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 23, 137.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1974 Multi-structured boundary layers on flat plates and related bodies. Adv. in Appl. Mech. 14, 145.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. & Williams, P. G. 1969 Self-induced separation. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 312, 181.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. I. 1978 Ph.D. thesis, University of London (to be submitted).