Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
The past year has not been one of startling discoveries. The effect of the disastrous war has been a paralysing one and the difficulties in the way of archaeological work have been great. While the political situation was so complicated, new undertakings were almost out of the question: it is to be hoped, however, that the report on 1898–9 will be able to speak of Crete as having been thrown open to the scientific world. The most interesting archaeological event has been the foundation of a new Austrian Institute, under the guidance of Prof. Benndorf in Vienna. Dr. A. Wilhelm, the wellknown epigraphist, and Dr. W. Reichel, whose brilliant essay on Homeric Armour has won for him a prominent place among archaeologists, are permanently stationed at Athens, and a building is contemplated in the near future. Dr. R. Heberdey will be stationed at Smyrna and Dr. Kalinka at Constantinople, so that the new Austrian Institute will be a powerful agency for the discovery and preservation of Hellenic antiquities. The old publication ‘Archäologisch-epigraphische Mittheilungen aus Oesterreich’ is now brought to a conclusion, and is replaced by the ‘Jahreshefte des österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes,’ of which vol. i. has appeared. The contemplated international congress of archaeologists at Athens, which the war of 1897 rendered out of the question, was announced for Easter 1898 to synchronize with the celebration of the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of the French School, but this year as before practical difficulties caused its postponement. The adjourned festivities at the French School took place as arranged. If the congress is to assemble at a future date, it will be necessary that arrangements should be made for it long enough beforehand to ensure its success.
page 328 note 1 See (with reference to Luxor and Karnak) Borchardt, L, ‘Bericht über die Corrosion des Sandsteinmaterials der Tempelhaulen auf Philae,’ Sitzungsber. der Berl. Akad. 1898. 23Google Scholar.
page 330 note 1 A recent incorrect newspaper report seems to refer to the finding of the basis of the cultus-statue.
page 334 note 1 This was described as a small Doric temple in the newspapers at first (Ath. Mitt. xxii. 1–2, 229).
page 336 note 1 Ath. Mitt. xxii. 1, 2, p. 183 (Krispi and Wilhelm).