No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2015
page 105 note 1 In ARW xxii. 363–390Google Scholar.
page 106 note 1 The reviewer would agree as regards Greece, but only with considerable reserves in the case of Rome.
page 106 note 2 Not altogether dissimilar conclusions are come to by the reviewer in a pamphlet, Modern methods in classical mythology (St. Andrews, 1930), p. 12sqq.Google Scholar