Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:30:29.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mitotic chromosomes of Sphaerostomum bramae (Müller, 1776) Szidat, 1944

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

R. Petkevičiūtė ,
G. Stanevičiūtė  and
V. Kiselienė
R. Petkevičiūtė
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Lithuanian Academy of Sciences, Akademijos 2, Vilnius 2600, Lithuania
G. Stanevičiūtė
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Lithuanian Academy of Sciences, Akademijos 2, Vilnius 2600, Lithuania
V. Kiselienė
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Lithuanian Academy of Sciences, Akademijos 2, Vilnius 2600, Lithuania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Karyometrical analysis of conventional Giemsa-stained mitotic chromosomes of parthenitae of Sphaerostomum bramae (Trematoda: Opecoelidae) was carried out. The karyotype displays a typical ‘plagiorchiid’ pattern with 22 chromosomes in a diploid set including a first pair of large metacentric elements. Chromosomes with medially or submedially located centromeres prevail in the karyotype; only chromosomes 7 and 9 are subtelocentric. With the data now available, close karyological affinity was noted between S. bramae, the representative of the family Opecoelidae, and other karyologically studied species of some families in the order Plagiorchiiformes: Troglotrematidae, Plagiorchiidae, Prosthogonimidae, Lecithodendriidae and Telorchiidae.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 347 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsiene, J. (1993) [The karyotypes of trematodes.] 370 pp. Vilnius, Academia (in Russian).Google ScholarPubMed
Birstein, V.J. (1987) [Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of vertebrate evolution.] 284 pp. Moskow, Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Brooks, D.R., O'Grady, R.T. & Glen, D.R. (1985) Phylogenetic analysis of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria) with comments on their adaptive radiation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 411–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, R.M. (1974) Phylogeny and taxonomy of trematodes with special reference to marine species, pp.173–194 in Vernberg, W.B. (Ed.) Symbiosis in the sea. Columbia, Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gresson, R.A.R. (1958) The gametogenesis of the digenetic trematode Sphaerostomum bramae (Müller) Luhe. Parasitology 48 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresson, R.A.R. (1964) Oogenesis in the hermaphroditic Digenea (Trematoda). Parasitology 54, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, A.I., Short, R.B. & Cain, G.D. (1981) Karyotype evolution and sex chromosome differentiation in schistosomes (Trematoda, Schistosomatidae). Chromosoma 84, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levan, A., Fredga, K. & Sandberg, A. (1964) Nomenclature for centromere position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odening, K. (1974) Verwandtschaft, System und zykloontogenetische Besonderheiten der Trematoden. Zoologischer Jahrbucher, Systematik 101, 3452013–396.Google Scholar
Rauckis, E. (1988) [Fish parasites in Lithuanian waters.] 208 pp. Vilnius, Mokslas (in Russian).Google Scholar
Walton, A.C. (1959) Some parasites and their chromosomes. Journal of Parasitology 45, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, M.J.D. (1978) Modes ofspeciation. 455 pp. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar