Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:30:38.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Various Definitive Hosts on the Development of Diplostomum phoxini (Strigeida, Trematoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

A. D. Berrie
A. D. Berrie
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

.1. Infection with Diplostomulum phoxini is very common among minnows in the Glasgow area of Scotland.

2. The first intermediate host of the parasite in this area is shown to be the freshwater snail Lymnaea peregra.

3. Adult flukes were obtained experimentally in mice, ducklings and herring-gull chicks.

4. Significant differences are shown to occur between adult flukes recovered from different host species.

5. The implications of these findings in relation to the host specificity and the classification of the Strigeida are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 34 , Issue 3-4 , September 1960 , pp. 205 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvy, L. and Buttner, A., 1954.—“Données sur le cycle éevolutif de Diplostomulum phoxini (Faust, 1918). (Trcmatoda, Diplostomidae).” C. R. Acad. Sri., 239, 1085—7. (W.L. 6633a).Google Scholar
Arvy, L., 1955.—“Cycle évolutif de Diplosiomulum phoxini (Faust, 1918) (Diplostomatidae).” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 80, 104—5 (W.L. 6401).Google Scholar
Ashworth, J. H. and Bannerman, J. C. W. 1927.—“On a tetracotyle (T. phoxini) in the brain of the minnow.” Trans, toy. Soc. Edinb., 55, 159—172 (W.L. 21652).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. J and Hopkins, C. A., 1956.—“The development of Diplostomum phoxini (Strigeida, Trematoda.)” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 50, 276—82 (W.L. 10631).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, G., 1938.—“Monographic des Strigeida (Trematoda)”. Mém. Soc. neuchâtel. Sci. nat., 6, 1—535 (W.L. 13318a).Google Scholar
Dubois, G., 1945.—“A propos de la specificity parasitairé des Strigeida”. Bull. Soc. neuchâtel. Sci. nat., 69, 5—103 (W.L. 52991).Google Scholar
Dubois, G., 1953.—“Systematique des Strigeida”. Méim. Soc. neuchâtel. Sci. nat., 8, 1–141, (W.L. 13318a).Google Scholar
Johri, L. N. and Smyth, J. D., 1956.—“A histochemical approach to the study of helminth morphology”. Parasitology, 46, 107–116. (W.L. 16035).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G., 1955.—“The adult and Diplostomulum stage (Diplostomulum phoxini (Faust)) of Diplostomum pelmatoides Dubois and an experimental demonstration of part of the life cycle”. Parasitology, 45, 295—312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G., 1957.—“Cercaria Diplostomi phoxini (Faust), a furcocercaria which develops into Dipostomulum phoxini in the brain of the minnow” Parasitology, 47, 126—137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar